Comparison of Hardness Enhancement and Wear Mechanisms in Low Temperature Nitrided Austenitic and Martensitic Stainless Steel

Energetic nitrogen implantation into austenitic stainless steel or nickel alloys leads to the formation of a very hard and wear resistant surface layer with an expanded lattice, while similar results are reported for selected martensitic steels. A comparison of the phase formation under identical process conditions at 380 °C using an austenitic (304) and a martensitic (420) steel grade (in an annealed ferrite/cementite condition) shows that the initial microstructure is retained in both of them. As the formation of dislocations and stacking faults cannot account for the dramatic hardness increase, the build-up of compressive stress is proffered as an explanation covering these two steel types. Furthermore the energetic nitrogen implantation apparently stabilizes the expanded lattice with suppressing the chemical transition to iron nitrides and, for steel 420, the metallurgical transition towards austenite at high nitrogen contents.

[1]  S. Mändl,et al.  Comparison of expanded austenite and expanded martensite formed after nitrogen PIII , 2004 .

[2]  R. Xu,et al.  Phonon Dispersions of fcc δ-Plutonium-Gallium by Inelastic X-ray Scattering , 2003, Science.

[3]  M. Fewell,et al.  Characteristics of martensitic stainless steel nitrided in a low-pressure RF plasma , 2003 .

[4]  S. Mändl,et al.  In situ stress measurements during low-energy nitriding of stainless steel , 2002 .

[5]  S. Mändl,et al.  Concentration dependent nitrogen diffusion coefficient in expanded austenite formed by ion implantation , 2002 .

[6]  P. I. John,et al.  A study of martensitic stainless steel AISI 420 modified using plasma nitriding , 2002 .

[7]  F. Willaime,et al.  Impact of electronic structure calculations on study of diffusion in metals , 2001 .

[8]  S. Mändl,et al.  Nitrogen Diffusion in Austenitic Stainless Steel and the Formation of Expanded Austenite , 2001 .

[9]  S. Mändl,et al.  Anisotropic strain in nitrided austenitic stainless steel , 2000 .

[10]  V. Gavriljuk,et al.  High nitrogen steels , 1999 .

[11]  Paul J. Wilbur,et al.  Effect of austenitic stainless steel composition on low-energy, high-flux, nitrogen ion beam processing , 1998 .

[12]  C. V. Cooper,et al.  Observation of a compound layer with very low friction coefficient in ion-nitrided martensitic 410 stainless steel , 1998 .

[13]  K. Short,et al.  Cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy characterisation of plasma immersion ion implanted austenitic stainless steel , 1996 .

[14]  M. Nastasi,et al.  Ion solid interactions , 1996 .

[15]  M. Nastasi,et al.  Ion–solid Interactions: Phase transformations , 1996 .

[16]  G. Collins,et al.  Advanced surface treatments by plasma ion implantation , 1994 .

[17]  P. Wilbur,et al.  Metastable phase formation and enhanced diffusion in f.c.c. alloys under high dose, high flux nitrogen implantation at high and low ion energies , 1994 .

[18]  D. B. Lewis,et al.  Low temperature plasma diffusion treatment of stainless steels for improved wear resistance , 1993 .

[19]  J. R. Conrad,et al.  Plasma source ion-implantation technique for surface modification of materials , 1987 .

[20]  K. Jack.  Results of further X‐ray structural investigations of the iron–carbon and iron–nitrogen systems and of related interstitial alloys , 1950 .