From TRIZ to OTSM-TRIZ: addressing complexity challenges in inventive design

Nowadays, the need to rebuild design practices in enterprises is strongly felt both in terms of human skills and methodological expertise. An emerging statement is that tools and methods developed during the quality and optimisation era have shown their limits and become inappropriate in the context of the needs of the innovation era. The aim of this paper is first to state that a partial answer to face the innovation era's difficulties has been brought about by the theory of inventive problem solving. Further, we will state the incapacity of TRIZ to face complex situations and, as a result, an extension of it has been proposed by OTSM-TRIZ theory. A case study conducted in collaboration with Thales regarding a ground-based radar design will be used here to illustrate how several of our assumptions, more precisely linked with a Contradiction Network, may be validated through the observation of practical results.

[1]  M. Mitchell Waldrop,et al.  Complexity : the emerging science and the edge of order and chaos , 1992 .

[2]  Altshuller Creativity As an Exact Science , 1984 .

[3]  Thomas Eltzer Contribution à l'intégration des approches standard et inventives dans la conception : Application à l'injection de thermoplastiques , 2005 .

[4]  John F. Sowa,et al.  Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine , 1983 .

[5]  P. Senge The fifth discipline : the art and practice of the learning organization/ Peter M. Senge , 1991 .

[6]  Antonio Rizzo,et al.  Contradictions and critical issues during system evolution , 2002, SAC '02.

[7]  Herman T. Epstein,et al.  An Outline of the Role of Brain in Human Cognitive Development , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge , 1974 .

[9]  Oliver Leaman,et al.  Key concepts in Eastern philosophy , 1999 .

[10]  Colette Rolland Modeling the evolution of artifacts , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering.

[11]  Roland De Guio,et al.  PROBLEMS OF FORECAST 1 , 2005 .

[12]  Alexander Borgida,et al.  Modeling class hierarchies with contradictions , 1988, SIGMOD '88.

[13]  Peter F. Patel-Schneider,et al.  Living wiht Classic: When and How to Use a KL-ONE-Like Language , 1991, Principles of Semantic Networks.

[14]  Marvin Minsky,et al.  A framework for representing knowledge" in the psychology of computer vision , 1975 .