Tuning characteristics of the top-down attentional setting

Previous studies of top-down attentional guidance have focused generally on the attentional prioritization of a single target feature. The present study focused on how the attentional system would be configured when the target possesses several unique features. These features were perfectly correlated, which meant that monitoring just one of them would be an adequate strategy. The experiments addressed the following questions: (a) If the target is a singleton, would the attentional system be set to monitor the target’s unique features, or would the search strategy default to singleton detection? (b) Can the target’s static and dynamic features be prioritized simultaneously? (c) Are all of the target’s features prioritized, or only those features that are diagnostic of targethood? The results revealed an attentional system that can be flexibly tuned to multiple target features across static and dynamic dimensions. This system can simultaneously be narrowly tuned to monitor a specific target feature and broadly tuned to detect singletons. Finally, the attentional system monitors only those features that are diagnostic of targethood.

[1]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Changing your mind: on the contributions of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  J Jonides,et al.  Attentional capture by abrupt onsets: new perceptual objects or visual masking? , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings , 2008 .

[5]  S. Yantis,et al.  Uniqueness of abrupt visual onset in capturing attention , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  H. Egeth,et al.  Effects of top-down guidance and singleton priming on visual search , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: evidence from visual search. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[9]  Brian A Anderson,et al.  Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  U. Ansorge,et al.  Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection: Reply to commentaries , 2010 .

[13]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  J. Theeuwes Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  D. Lamy,et al.  Task-irrelevant stimulus salience affects visual search , 2009, Vision Research.

[17]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  J. Theeuwes Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[21]  J T Todd,et al.  Implications of a transient-sustained dichotomy for the measurement of human performance. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Jessica L. Irons,et al.  All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Attentional capture in singleton-detection and feature-search modes. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Effects of task relevance and stimulus-driven salience in feature-search mode. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  What is top-down about contingent capture? , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[27]  H. Müller,et al.  Visual search for dimensionally redundant pop-out targets: Evidence for parallel-coactive processing of dimensions , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  Dominique Lamy,et al.  Effects of search mode and intertrial priming on singleton search , 2006, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  R. Remington,et al.  Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: evidence for two forms of attentional capture. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[32]  C. Folk,et al.  Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings? , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[33]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.