F1000Prime recommended articles and their citations: an exploratory study of four journals
暂无分享,去创建一个
Qiang Wu | Nan Zhang | Joshua Williams | Peiling Wang | Nan Zhang | Peiling Wang | Qiang Wu | Joshua Williams
[1] D. Benos,et al. The ups and downs of peer review. , 2007, Advances in physiology education.
[2] Jian Wang,et al. Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation , 2013, Scientometrics.
[3] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[4] Ludo Waltman,et al. F1000 Recommendations as a Potential New Data Source for Research Evaluation: A Comparison With Citations , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[5] G. Cumming,et al. High Impact = High Statistical Standards? Not Necessarily So , 2013, PloS one.
[6] D. Wardle. Do 'Faculty of 1000' (F1000) ratings of ecological publications serve as reasonable predictors of their future impact? , 2010 .
[7] Mike Thelwall,et al. Validating online reference managers for scholarly impact measurement , 2011, Scientometrics.
[8] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Field- and time-normalization of data with many zeros: an empirical analysis using citation and Twitter data , 2017, Scientometrics.
[9] Ann Blandford,et al. Keeping up to date: An academic researcher's information journey , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[10] David P. Doane,et al. Measuring Skewness: A Forgotten Statistic? , 2011 .
[11] Peiling Wang,et al. A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study II. Decisions at the Reading and Citing Stages , 1999, Journal of the American Society for Information Science.
[12] Stefan Hirschauer. How Editors Decide. Oral Communication in Journal Peer Review , 2015 .
[13] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Relative Citation Ratio (RCR): An empirical attempt to study a new field‐normalized bibliometric indicator , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[14] Peiling Wang,et al. A Cognitive Model of Document Use During a Research Project. Study II. Decisions at the Reading and Citing Stages , 1999, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[15] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Methods for the generation of normalized citation impact scores in bibliometrics: Which method best reflects the judgements of experts? , 2014, J. Informetrics.
[16] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Do altmetrics correlate with the quality of papers? A large-scale empirical study based on F1000Prime data , 2017, PloS one.
[17] Henry G. Small,et al. Why authors think their papers are highly cited , 2004, Scientometrics.
[18] M. Walport,et al. Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs , 2009, PloS one.
[19] Bertil F. Dorch. On the Citation Advantage of linking to data , 2012 .
[20] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Which people use which scientific papers? An evaluation of data from F1000 and Mendeley , 2015, J. Informetrics.
[21] Jian Du,et al. The effects of research level and article type on the differences between citation metrics and F1000 recommendations , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Derek J. de Solla Price,et al. Science Since Babylon , 1961 .
[23] Jian Wang,et al. Which percentile-based approach should be preferred for calculating normalized citation impact values? An empirical comparison of five approaches including a newly developed citation-rank approach (P100) , 2013, J. Informetrics.
[24] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[25] Lutz Bornmann,et al. Interrater reliability and convergent validity of F1000Prime peer review , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[26] Loet Leydesdorff,et al. The validation of (advanced) bibliometric indicators through peer assessments: A comparative study using data from InCites and F1000 , 2012, J. Informetrics.
[27] Peiling Wang,et al. Research classics and citation analysis , 2006, ASIST.
[28] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing non-standard article impact using F1000 labels , 2013, Scientometrics.
[29] Jan Velterop,et al. Post‐publication filtering and evaluation: Faculty of 1000 , 2003, Learn. Publ..