Cross-institutional data exchange using the clinical document architecture (CDA)

PROBLEM Although electronic communication of clinical data between various actors in the healthcare domain seems crucial for a cost-effective patient treatment, it is mostly restricted to paper based documents. In order to meet the growing need for improved data communication, it is necessary to overcome the barriers of software heterogeneity and lack of standards, especially in cross-institutional shared care communication. HL7's clinical document architecture (CDA) is a new and promising tool to exchange any clinical document. In this paper we show how CDA can be used to (1) share electronic discharge letters and other clinical data generated and stored in the hospitals electronic patient record (EPR) with general practitioners and (2) to transfer these clinical data to a personal electronic health record (EHR). The latter scenario is in routine use. Ease-of-use and data security and integrity were the main design principles in both scenarios. METHODS Within the electronic patient record a data extraction and exporting mechanism has been built. For both scenarios appropriate data processing and transmission methods have been developed, and the receiving information systems have been prepared for the CDA based data input. RESULTS Although there still remain technical and organizational issues to be solved, this is a promising method in order to enhance data exchange between hospital and primary care and to move towards an electronic patient record (EPR) and an electronic health record (EHR) crossing institutional borders. This paper describes the design and current implementation and discusses our experiences.

[1]  P. V. Biron,et al.  The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture. , 2001, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA.

[2]  H U Prokosch.  [Steps towards a hospital information system: illustrated by the example of the medical setting of the Westphalian Wilhelms University of Münster]. , 1999, Zentralblatt fur Gynakologie.

[3]  Joachim Dudeck,et al.  Discharge and referral data exchange using global standards - the SCIPHOX project in Germany , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  P S Woolman,et al.  XML for immediate discharge letters in Scotland. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[5]  Waegemann Cp.  The five levels of the ultimate electronic health record. , 1995 .

[6]  Reinhold Haux,et al.  Using the eXtensible Markup Language (XML) in a Regional Electronic Patient Record for Patients with Malignant Diseases , 2001, MedInfo.

[7]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  The diagnosis related groups enhanced electronic medical record , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  Implementing security and access control mechanisms for an electronic healthcare record , 2002, AMIA.

[9]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  Akteonline-an electronic healthcare record as a medium for information and communication. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[10]  Frank Sullivan,et al.  Has general practitioner computing made a difference to patient care? A systematic review of published reports , 1995, BMJ.

[11]  R Haux,et al.  Networking in Shared Care – First Steps towards a Shared Electronic Patient Record for Cancer Patients , 2002, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[12]  C P Waegemann.  The five levels of the ultimate electronic health record. , 1995, Healthcare informatics : the business magazine for information and communication systems.

[13]  F. Sullivan,et al.  A descriptive feast but an evaluative famine: systematic review of published articles on primary care computing during 1980-97 , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  C P Waegemann,et al.  The five levels of electronic health records. , 1996, M.D. computing : computers in medical practice.

[15]  C Ohmann,et al.  Integrating knowledge based functionality in commercial hospital information systems. , 2000, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[16]  Hans-Ulrich Prokosch,et al.  Empowerment of patients and communication with health care professionals through an electronic health record , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[17]  Robert H. Baud,et al.  XMLA as standard for communicating in a document-based electronic patient record: a 3 years experiment , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[18]  Rachael Sokolowski,et al.  HL7 document patient record architecture: an XML document architecture based on a shared information model , 1999, AMIA.

[19]  G O Klein.  Standardization of health informatics - results and challenges. , 2002, Yearbook of medical informatics.

[20]  H U Prokosch,et al.  Functions of an electronic health record. , 2002, International journal of computerized dentistry.

[21]  Robert H. Dolin,et al.  An update on HL7's XML-based document representation standards , 2000, AMIA.

[22]  Waegemann Cp.  The five levels of electronic health records. , 1996 .

[23]  T Bürkle,et al.  Optimizing coding quality: the role of the electronic medical record in the context of diagnosis related groups. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[24]  P. S. Woolman.  XML for electronic clinical communications in Scotland , 2001, Int. J. Medical Informatics.