Abnormal cervical appearance: what to do, when to worry?

Many clinicians encounter cervical lesions that may or may not be associated with cytologic abnormalities. Such abnormalities as ectropion, Nabothian cysts, and small cervical polyps are quite benign and need not generate concern for patient or clinician, whereas others, including those associated with a history of exposure to diethylstilbestrol, cervical inflammation, abnormal cervical cytology, and postcoital bleeding, should prompt additional evaluation. Further, in some patients, the cervix may be difficult to visualize. Several useful clinical suggestions for the optimal examination of the cervix are presented.

[1]  M. Goldacre,et al.  Epidemiology and clinical significance of cervical erosion in women attending a family planning clinic. , 1978, British medical journal.

[2]  J. Trimbos,et al.  Clinical characteristics of Chlamydia trachomatis infections in a general outpatient department of obstetrics and gynaecology in the Netherlands , 2002, Sexually transmitted infections.

[3]  P. Croft,et al.  A systematic review of postcoital bleeding and risk of cervical cancer. , 2006, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[4]  P. Schnatz,et al.  Cervical polyps in postmenopausal women: is there a difference in risk? , 2009, Menopause.

[5]  B. Sahu,et al.  Prevalence of pathology in women attending colposcopy for postcoital bleeding with negative cytology , 2007, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[6]  P. Hartge,et al.  Cancer risk in women exposed to diethylstilbestrol in utero. , 1998, JAMA.

[7]  P. Hartge,et al.  Incidence of squamous neoplasia of the cervix and vagina in women exposed prenatally to diethylstilbestrol (United States) , 2001, Cancer Causes & Control.

[8]  A. Herbst,et al.  Rates and risks of diethylstilbestrol-related clear-cell adenocarcinoma of the vagina and cervix. An update. , 1987 .

[9]  P. Clement,et al.  Superficial endometriosis of the uterine cervix: a report of 20 cases of a process that may be confused with endocervical glandular dysplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. , 1999, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[10]  Y. Itai,et al.  MR imaging of the uterine cervix: imaging-pathologic correlation. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.