Ambulatory arrhythmia monitoring: choosing the right device.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Krahn,et al. The etiology of syncope in patients with negative tilt table and electrophysiological testing. , 1995, Circulation.
[2] M. Misfeld,et al. Twenty-Four–Hour Holter Monitor Follow-Up Does Not Provide Accurate Heart Rhythm Status After Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Therapy: Up to 12 Months Experience With a Novel Permanently Implantable Heart Rhythm Monitor Device , 2009, Circulation.
[3] Norman J. Holter,et al. New Method for Heart Studies , 1961, Science.
[4] A. Raviele,et al. Recurrent unexplained palpitations (RUP) study comparison of implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic strategy. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[5] C. Kurer. Implantable looprecorders: dollars and sense* , 2003 .
[6] B. Hanusa,et al. The duration of Holter monitoring in patients with syncope. Is 24 hours enough? , 1990, Archives of internal medicine.
[7] R Yee,et al. Final results from a pilot study with an implantable loop recorder to determine the etiology of syncope in patients with negative noninvasive and invasive testing. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.
[8] M. Linnaluoto,et al. Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: a safe, time-saving, and cost-effective means for follow-up , 2008, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[9] Mark Josephson,et al. The Evolving Role of Ambulatory Arrhythmia Monitoring in General Clinical Practice , 1999, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[10] N. Freemantle,et al. The clinical impact of implantable loop recorders in patients with syncope. , 2006, European heart journal.
[11] E. Mohammadi,et al. Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.
[12] Massimo Santini,et al. Monitored atrial fibrillation duration predicts arterial embolic events in patients suffering from bradycardia and atrial fibrillation implanted with antitachycardia pacemakers. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] Amanda Neil,et al. Cardiac Event Recorders Yield More Diagnoses and Are More Cost-effective than 48-Hour Holter Monitoring in Patients with Palpitations: A Controlled Clinical Trial , 1996, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[14] G. Lamas,et al. Atrial High Rate Episodes Detected by Pacemaker Diagnostics Predict Death and Stroke: Report of the Atrial Diagnostics Ancillary Study of the MOde Selection Trial (MOST) , 2003, Circulation.
[15] J. Nielsen,et al. Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Ablation and the Impact on Quality of Life , 2009, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.
[16] P. Kowey,et al. First experience with a Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry (MCOT) system for the diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmia. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.
[18] A. Krahn,et al. The high cost of syncope: cost implications of a new insertable loop recorder in the investigation of recurrent syncope. , 1999, American heart journal.
[19] Dongfeng Qi,et al. The Relationship Between Daily Atrial Tachyarrhythmia Burden From Implantable Device Diagnostics and Stroke Risk: The TRENDS Study , 2009, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.
[20] E. Prystowsky,et al. Utility and cost of event recorders in the diagnosis of palpitations, presyncope, and syncope. , 1997, The American journal of cardiology.
[21] J. Alpert,et al. ACC/AHA Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the Guidelines for Ambulatory Electrocardiography). Developed in collaboration with the North American Society for P , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[22] A. Skanes,et al. A prospective randomized comparison of loop recorders versus Holter monitors in patients with syncope or presyncope. , 2003, The American journal of medicine.
[23] J. Dimarco,et al. Use of ambulatory electrocardiographic (Holter) monitoring. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.
[24] A. Elhendy,et al. Heart Rhythm During Syncope and Presyncope: Results of Implantable Loop Recorders , 2000, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.
[25] Jonathan H Seltzer,et al. The Diagnosis of Cardiac Arrhythmias: A Prospective Multi‐Center Randomized Study Comparing Mobile Cardiac Outpatient Telemetry Versus Standard Loop Event Monitoring , 2007, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.
[26] Charles Ho,et al. Advances in ambulatory monitoring: regulatory considerations. , 2004, Journal of electrocardiology.
[27] A. Douen,et al. Usefulness of Cardiovascular Investigations in Stroke Management: Clinical Relevance and Economic Implications , 2007, Stroke.
[28] D. Massel,et al. External loop recorders: determinants of diagnostic yield in patients with syncope. , 2004, American heart journal.
[29] Martin O'Donnell,et al. After Acute Ischemic Stroke : A Systematic Review Noninvasive Cardiac Monitoring for Detecting Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation or Flutter , 2007 .
[30] Ary Goldberger,et al. Diagnostic Yield and Optimal Duration of Continuous-Loop Event Monitoring for the Diagnosis of Palpitations: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 1998, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[31] Niraj Varma,et al. Rationale and design of a prospective study of the efficacy of a remote monitoring system used in implantable cardioverter defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-Up Study (TRUST) study. , 2007, American heart journal.
[32] G. Lip,et al. Multicenter randomized study of anticoagulation guided by remote rhythm monitoring in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and CRT-D devices: Rationale, design, and clinical characteristics of the initially enrolled cohort The IMPACT study. , 2009, American Heart Journal.
[33] A. Skanes,et al. Use of the Implantable Loop Recorder in Evaluation of Patients with Unexplained Syncope , 2003, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.
[34] Hugh Calkins,et al. Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation , 2006, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.
[35] Allan C Skanes,et al. Cost implications of testing strategy in patients with syncope: randomized assessment of syncope trial. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.