Contribution of inter-site variations in architecture to trabecular bone apparent yield strains.

Apparent yield strains for trabecular bone are uniform within an anatomic site but can vary across site. The overall goal of this study was to characterize the contribution of inter-site differences in trabecular architecture to corresponding variations in apparent yield strains. High-resolution, small deformation finite element analyses were used to compute apparent compressive and tensile yield strains in four sites (n = 7 specimens per site): human proximal tibia, greater trochanter, femoral neck, and bovine proximal tibia. These sites display differences in compressive, but not tensile, apparent yield strains. Inter-site differences in architecture were captured implicitly in the model geometries, and these differences were isolated as the sole source of variability across sites by using identical tissue properties in all models. Thus, the effects inter-site variations in architecture on yield strain could be assessed by comparing computed yield strains across site. No inter-site differences in computed yield strains were found for either loading mode (p > 0.19), indicating that, within the context of small deformations, inter-site variations in architecture do not affect apparent yield strains. However, results of ancillary analyses designed to test the validity of the small deformation assumption strongly suggested that the propensity to undergo large deformations constitutes an important contribution of architecture to inter-site variations in apparent compressive yield strains. Large deformations substantially reduced apparent compressive, but not tensile, yield strains. These findings indicate the importance of incorporating large deformation capabilities in computational analyses of trabecular bone. This may be critical when investigating the biomechanical consequences of trabecular thinning and loss.

[1]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Uniaxial yield strains for bovine trabecular bone are isotropic and asymmetric , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  L. Mosekilde,et al.  Biomechanical competence of vertebral trabecular bone in relation to ash density and age in normal individuals. , 1987, Bone.

[3]  G. Niebur,et al.  Convergence behavior of high-resolution finite element models of trabecular bone. , 1999, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[4]  W. Mysiw,et al.  Intermittent cyclical etidronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. , 1990, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  G. Pharr,et al.  Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation. , 1997, Biomaterials.

[6]  R M Rose,et al.  A structural model for the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone. , 1973, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  T M Keaveny,et al.  Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in trabecular architecture: a three-dimensional finite element study. , 1999, Bone.

[8]  T. McMahon,et al.  Trabecular bone exhibits fully linear elastic behavior and yields at low strains. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  L. Gibson The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone. , 1985, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  G. Niebur,et al.  High-resolution finite element models with tissue strength asymmetry accurately predict failure of trabecular bone. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[11]  R. Huiskes,et al.  Constitutive relationships of fabric, density, and elastic properties in cancellous bone architecture. , 1999, Bone.

[12]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Yield strain behavior of trabecular bone. , 1998, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  G. H. Bell,et al.  Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[14]  G Boivin,et al.  Bone mineral density reflects bone mass but also the degree of mineralization of bone: therapeutic implications. , 1997, Bone.

[15]  N. Kikuchi,et al.  A homogenization sampling procedure for calculating trabecular bone effective stiffness and tissue level stress. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[16]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Dependence of yield strain of human trabecular bone on anatomic site. , 2001, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  K L White,et al.  Technology and health care. , 1972, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  A. Parfitt Implications of architecture for the pathogenesis and prevention of vertebral fracture. , 1992, Bone.

[19]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  Direct Three‐Dimensional Morphometric Analysis of Human Cancellous Bone: Microstructural Data from Spine, Femur, Iliac Crest, and Calcaneus , 1999, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  J. Kinney,et al.  On the importance of geometric nonlinearity in finite-element simulations of trabecular bone failure. , 2003, Bone.

[21]  T M Keaveny,et al.  Nonlinear behavior of trabecular bone at small strains. , 2001, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Ivan Hvid,et al.  Energy absorptive properties of human trabecular bone specimens during axial compression , 1989, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[23]  S A Goldstein,et al.  Heterogeneity of bone lamellar-level elastic moduli. , 2000, Bone.

[24]  G. Niebur,et al.  Comparison of the elastic and yield properties of human femoral trabecular and cortical bone tissue. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[25]  Guo X. Edward,et al.  Is Trabecular Bone Tissue Different from Cortical Bone Tissue , 1998 .

[26]  T M Keaveny,et al.  Three-dimensional imaging of trabecular bone using the computer numerically controlled milling technique. , 1997, Bone.

[27]  C. Turner,et al.  Yield behavior of bovine cancellous bone. , 1989, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[28]  W C Hayes,et al.  Micro-compression: a novel technique for the nondestructive assessment of local bone failure. , 1998, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[29]  J. Galante,et al.  Physical properties of trabecular bone , 2005, Calcified Tissue Research.

[30]  S. Majumdar,et al.  High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties. , 1998, Bone.

[31]  G. Pharr,et al.  The elastic properties of trabecular and cortical bone tissues are similar: results from two microscopic measurement techniques. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. , 1999, Bone.

[33]  W. C. Hayes,et al.  Role of trabecular morphology in the etiology of age-related vertebral fractures , 2005, Calcified Tissue International.

[34]  W C Hayes,et al.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.