Mapping megacity growth with multi-sensor data

Abstract In our increasingly urbanized world, monitoring and mapping of urban growth and thereby induced land-use and land-cover change (LULCC) is of emergent importance. Remote sensing can reveal spatio-temporal growth trajectories of cities, which again allow a thorough understanding of the impacts of urbanization on ecosystems and ecosystem services. However, the mapping of urban areas remains one of the most challenging tasks of remote sensing data analysis. This paper presents an approach to map urban growth from multi-sensoral data, exemplified for the Dhaka megacity region in Bangladesh between 1990 and 2006. The approach is globally applicable and can facilitate regional urban growth maps in arbitrary complex and dynamic environments. Dhaka's densified urban landscape, its deltaic locality and the highly dynamic monsoon-related phenology call for a sophisticated analysis approach that is able to separate intra-annual land-cover variations from actual urbanization. Imagery from the Landsat series of satellites is a great asset for such an analysis due to its synoptic coverage of large urban areas as well as its unique historical archives. In our approach, we solve problems of spectral ambiguities and seasonal phenological dynamics through incorporating multi-temporal imagery for each monitoring year (1990, 2000, and 2006) and by extending the spectral feature space with synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data. The resulting datasets are heterogeneous and comprise measurements of unequal scaling. Non-parametric classification algorithms are required to delineate multi-modal and non-Gaussian class distributions of heterogeneous as well as temporally and spectrally complex land-cover classes of interest in such an extended feature space. We therefore used a support vector machine (SVM) classifier and post classification comparison to reveal spatio-temporal patterns of urban land-use and land-cover changes. An SVM based forward feature selection procedure allowed deriving in-depth information about the individual contribution of different input bands. Our methodology delineated relevant land-cover classes and resulted in overall accuracies better than 83% for all years considered. Change analysis unveiled a profound expansion of urban areas at the expense of prime agricultural areas and wetlands. During the 1990s, change was primarily characterized by a densification of urban fabric, whereas more recent changes included vast in-filling of low lying land and an extensive industrial sprawl into Dhaka's peri-urban areas. Our multi-sensoral and multi-temporal mapping approach allowed for delineating temporally dynamic LULCC, which again allowed for an insightful characterization of land system changes in the megacity region of Dhaka.

[1]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Impact of different morphological profiles on the classification accuracy of urban hyperspectral data , 2009, 2009 First Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing.

[2]  P. Gain,et al.  Bangladesh environment: facing the 21st century. , 1998 .

[3]  Anwara Begum Urban Housing as an Issue of Redistribution through Planning? The Case of Dhaka City , 2007 .

[4]  John B. Braden,et al.  Bio-economic development of floodplains: farming versus fishing in Bangladesh , 2006, Environment and Development Economics.

[5]  C. Small,et al.  A global analysis of urban reflectance , 2005 .

[6]  Maggi Kelly,et al.  A spatial–temporal approach to monitoring forest disease spread using multi-temporal high spatial resolution imagery , 2006 .

[7]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images , 2009 .

[8]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  Spectrometry for urban area remote sensing—Development and analysis of a spectral library from 350 to 2400 nm , 2004 .

[9]  John A. Richards,et al.  Analysis of remotely sensed data: the formative decades and the future , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Michael A. Wulder,et al.  Landsat continuity: Issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring , 2008 .

[11]  Patrick Hostert,et al.  Classifying segmented hyperspectral data from a heterogeneous urban environment using support vector machines , 2007 .

[12]  Ashbindu Singh,et al.  Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data , 1989 .

[13]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Harshness in image classification accuracy assessment , 2008 .

[14]  Ridha Touzi,et al.  A review of speckle filtering in the context of estimation theory , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[15]  C. Small,et al.  Cities from space: potential applications of remote sensing in urban environmental research and policy , 2003 .

[16]  S. P. S. Kushwaha,et al.  Evaluation of various digital image processing techniques for detection of coastal wetlands using ERS-1 SAR data , 2000 .

[17]  Lloyd L. Coulter,et al.  Assessment of the Spatial Co-registration of Multitemporal Imagery from Large Format Digital Cameras in the Context of Detailed Change Detection , 2008, Sensors.

[18]  M. Turner Landscape ecology in North America: past, present, and future , 2005 .

[19]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Global Consequences of Land Use , 2005, Science.

[20]  Luis Gómez-Chova,et al.  Urban monitoring using multi-temporal SAR and multi-spectral data , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[21]  Peng Gong,et al.  Using local transition probability models in Markov random fields for forest change detection , 2008 .

[22]  R. L. Meier,et al.  Planning and designing new urban settlement on estuaries: Bangladesh , 1991 .

[23]  M. Q. Zaman SOCIAL STRUCTURE AND PROCESS IN CHAR LAND SETTLEMENT IN THE BRAHMAPUTRA-JAMUNA FLOODPLAIN , 1991 .

[24]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Vegetation in deserts. I - A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images. II - Environmental influences on regional abundance , 1990 .

[25]  G. L. Schmidt,et al.  A multi‐scale segmentation approach to filling gaps in Landsat ETM+ SLC‐off images , 2007 .

[26]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  D. Michelson Comparison of Algorithms for Classifying Swedish Landcover Using Landsat TM and ERS-1 SAR Data , 2000 .

[28]  G. Reichert,et al.  Evaluation of segment‐based gap‐filled Landsat ETM+ SLC‐off satellite data for land cover classification in southern Saskatchewan, Canada , 2008 .

[29]  Eric Pottier,et al.  Quantitative comparison of classification capability: fully polarimetric versus dual and single-polarization SAR , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[30]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Classification and Change Detection Using Landsat TM Data: When and How to Correct Atmospheric Effects? , 2001 .

[31]  Xavier Pons,et al.  Post-classification change detection with data from different sensors: Some accuracy considerations , 2003 .

[32]  M. Ridd Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil) model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative anatomy for cities , 1995 .

[33]  K. Bollmann,et al.  The Importance of Spatial Scale in Habitat Models: Capercaillie in the Swiss Alps , 2005, Landscape Ecology.

[34]  C. Tucker,et al.  NASA’s Global Orthorectified Landsat Data Set , 2004 .

[35]  Björn Waske,et al.  Classifying Multilevel Imagery From SAR and Optical Sensors by Decision Fusion , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[36]  F. Kraas,et al.  Megacities and global change: key priorities , 2007 .

[37]  Scott J. Goetz,et al.  Monitoring and predicting urban land use change applications of multi-resolution multi-temporal satellite data , 2003, IGARSS 2003. 2003 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37477).

[38]  David Satterthwaite,et al.  URBAN CENTERS: An Assessment of Sustainability , 2003 .

[39]  A. Dewan,et al.  Using remote sensing and GIS to detect and monitor land use and land cover change in Dhaka Metropolitan of Bangladesh during 1960–2005 , 2009, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[40]  L. S. Davis,et al.  An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classi(cid:142) cation , 2002 .

[41]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  Remote Sensing of Urban/Suburban Infrastructure and Socio‐Economic Attributes , 2011 .

[42]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Monitoring land-use change in the Pearl River Delta using Landsat TM , 2002 .

[43]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[44]  Alan T. Murray,et al.  Monitoring the composition of urban environments based on the vegetation-impervious surface-soil (VIS) model by subpixel analysis techniques , 2002 .

[45]  D. Maktav,et al.  Remote sensing of urban areas , 2005 .

[46]  Nazrul Islam,et al.  Urbanisation, migration and development in Bangladesh : recent trends and emerging issues , 1999 .

[47]  N. W. Park,et al.  Integration of multitemporal/polarization C‐band SAR data sets for land‐cover classification , 2008 .

[48]  Margaret E. Gardner,et al.  THE SPECTRAL DIMENSION IN URBAN LAND COVER MAPPING FROM HIGH- RESOLUTION OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING DATA * , 2002 .

[49]  William J. Emery,et al.  Urban Mapping Using Coarse SAR and Optical Data: Outcome of the 2007 GRSS Data Fusion Contest , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[50]  Christopher Small,et al.  The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space , 2004 .

[51]  S. Rashid The urban poor in Dhaka City: their struggles and coping strategies during the floods of 1998. , 2000, Disasters.

[52]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[53]  F. H. Khan,et al.  Geology of Bangladesh , 1993 .

[54]  Johannes R. Sveinsson,et al.  Random Forests for land cover classification , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[55]  Bert Guindon,et al.  Landsat urban mapping based on a combined spectral–spatial methodology , 2004 .

[56]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing , 2005 .

[57]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  Wrappers for Feature Subset Selection , 1997, Artif. Intell..

[58]  N. Grimm,et al.  Global Change and the Ecology of Cities , 2008, Science.