Predicting single-cell transcription dynamics even when the central limit theorem fails

Mechanistic modeling is more predictive in engineering than in biology, but the reason for this discrepancy is poorly understood. The difference extends beyond randomness and complexity in biological systems. Statistical tools exist to disentangle such issues in other disciplines, but these assume normally distributed fluctuations or enormous datasets, which don’t apply to the discrete, positive and non-symmetric distributions that characterize single-cell and single-molecule dynamics. Our approach captures discrete, non-normal effects within finite datasets and enables biologically significant predictions. Using transcription regulation as an example, we discover quantitatively precise, reproducible, and predictive understanding of diverse transcription regulation mechanisms, including gene activation, polymerase initiation, elongation, mRNA accumulation, transport, and degradation. Our model-data integration approach extends to any discrete dynamic process with rare events and realistically limited data.

[1]  Howard Y. Chang,et al.  Single-cell chromatin accessibility reveals principles of regulatory variation , 2015, Nature.

[2]  Sean C. Bendall,et al.  Single-Cell Mass Cytometry of Differential Immune and Drug Responses Across a Human Hematopoietic Continuum , 2011, Science.

[3]  Michael P H Stumpf,et al.  Sensitivity, robustness, and identifiability in stochastic chemical kinetics models , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  M. Khammash,et al.  The finite state projection algorithm for the solution of the chemical master equation. , 2006, The Journal of chemical physics.

[5]  Johan Paulsson,et al.  Exploiting Natural Fluctuations to Identify Kinetic Mechanisms in Sparsely Characterized Systems. , 2016, Cell systems.

[6]  M. Khammash,et al.  Systematic Identification of Signal-Activated Stochastic Gene Regulation , 2013, Science.

[7]  Alexander van Oudenaarden,et al.  Variability in gene expression underlies incomplete penetrance , 2009, Nature.

[8]  John Lygeros,et al.  Designing experiments to understand the variability in biochemical reaction networks , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[9]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Using Gene Expression Noise to Understand Gene Regulation , 2012, Science.

[10]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Finite state projection based bounds to compare chemical master equation models using single-cell data. , 2016, The Journal of chemical physics.

[11]  Rona S. Gertner,et al.  Single-Cell Genomics Unveils Critical Regulators of Th17 Cell Pathogenicity , 2015, Cell.

[12]  Francesc Posas,et al.  Response to Hyperosmotic Stress , 2012, Genetics.

[13]  M. Peter,et al.  Scalable inference of heterogeneous reaction kinetics from pooled single-cell recordings , 2013, Nature Methods.

[14]  Henry Pinkard,et al.  Advanced methods of microscope control using μManager software. , 2014, Journal of biological methods.

[15]  Christoph Zimmer,et al.  Experimental Design for Stochastic Models of Nonlinear Signaling Pathways Using an Interval-Wise Linear Noise Approximation and State Estimation , 2016, PloS one.

[16]  F S Fay,et al.  Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. , 1998, Science.

[17]  Yaron E. Antebi,et al.  Dynamics of epigenetic regulation at the single-cell level , 2016, Science.

[18]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Cellular Decision Making and Biological Noise: From Microbes to Mammals , 2011, Cell.

[19]  Kevin Struhl,et al.  Distinction and relationship between elongation rate and processivity of RNA polymerase II in vivo. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[20]  Rajan P Kulkarni,et al.  Tunability and Noise Dependence in Differentiation Dynamics , 2007, Science.

[21]  Jared E. Toettcher,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Lentiviral Positive-Feedback Loop: HIV-1 Tat Fluctuations Drive Phenotypic Diversity , 2005, Cell.

[22]  Kirsten L. Frieda,et al.  Synthetic recording and in situ readout of lineage information in single cells , 2016, Nature.

[23]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[24]  Jerome T. Mettetal,et al.  The Frequency Dependence of Osmo-Adaptation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2008, Science.

[25]  L. Pelkmans,et al.  Control of Transcript Variability in Single Mammalian Cells , 2015, Cell.

[26]  Luke D. Lavis,et al.  Real-time quantification of single RNA translation dynamics in living cells , 2016, Science.

[27]  T. Rothenberg Identification in Parametric Models , 1971 .

[28]  Bin Wu,et al.  Real-Time Observation of Transcription Initiation and Elongation on an Endogenous Yeast Gene , 2011, Science.

[29]  Philipp Thomas,et al.  Stochastic Simulation of Biomolecular Networks in Dynamic Environments , 2015, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  Hazen P Babcock,et al.  High-throughput single-cell gene-expression profiling with multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Transcription Factors Modulate c-Fos Transcriptional Bursts , 2014, Cell reports.

[32]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  A Systems-Level Analysis of Perfect Adaptation in Yeast Osmoregulation , 2009, Cell.

[33]  J. Hespanha,et al.  Stochastic models for chemically reacting systems using polynomial stochastic hybrid systems , 2005 .

[34]  Ido Golding,et al.  Measurement of gene regulation in individual cells reveals rapid switching between promoter states , 2016, Science.

[35]  Bonnie E. Shook-Sa,et al.  . CC-BY-NC-ND 4 . 0 International licenseIt is made available under a is the author / funder , who has granted medRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity , 2021 .

[36]  J. Elf,et al.  Direct measurement of transcription factor dissociation excludes a simple operator occupancy model for gene regulation , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[37]  D. A. Mcquarrie Stochastic approach to chemical kinetics , 1967, Journal of Applied Probability.

[38]  Pamela A. Silver,et al.  Regulated nucleo/cytoplasmic exchange of HOG1 MAPK requires the importin β homologs NMD5 and XPO1 , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[39]  J. Peccoud,et al.  Markovian Modeling of Gene-Product Synthesis , 1995 .

[40]  Aviv Regev,et al.  Deconstructing transcriptional heterogeneity in pluripotent stem cells , 2014, Nature.