On-road and laboratory evaluation of combustion aerosols-Part1: Summary of diesel engine results

Abstract The objective was to characterize diesel exhaust aerosols on road and to duplicate the results in the laboratory without altering the physical characteristics of the nuclei mode. On-road emissions from four, heavy-duty diesel truck engines were measured. The same engines were reevaluated in the manufacturers’ laboratories. For highway cruise and acceleration conditions, all engines produced bimodal size distributions with the nuclei mode ranging in size from 6 to 11 nm and the accumulation mode from 52 to 62 nm. On-road size distribution measurements nearly always showed a nuclei mode while laboratory measurements showed a nuclei mode under many, but not all conditions. Laboratory studies showed that nuclei mode particles consisted mainly of heavy hydrocarbons. More than 97% of the volume of 12 and 30 nm particles disappeared on heating to 400 °C. The volatility resembled that of C24–C32 n -alkanes implying a significant contribution from lubricating oil.

[1]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Size Distributions of Motor Vehicle Exhaust PM: A Comparison Between ELPI and SMPS Measurements , 2000 .

[2]  Simone Hochgreb,et al.  Particulate Matter Emission During Start-up and Transient Operation of a Spark-Ignition Engine (2): Effect of Speed, Load, and Real-World Driving Cycles , 2000 .

[3]  Klaus Willeke,et al.  Aerosol Measurement: Principles, Techniques, and Applications , 2001 .

[4]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Characterization of Exhaust Particulate Emissions from a Spark Ignition Engine , 1998 .

[5]  H. Hansson,et al.  Experimental verification of the particle detection efficiency of TSI 3025 UCPC , 1990 .

[6]  D. Kittelson,et al.  A New Electrical Mobility Particle Sizer Spectrometer for Engine Exhaust Particle Measurements , 2004 .

[7]  D. J. Rickeard,et al.  Exhaust Particulate Size Distribution: Vehicle and Fuel Influences in Light Duty Vehicles , 1996 .

[8]  Martin Mohr,et al.  Separation of volatile and non-volatile aerosol fractions by thermodesorption: instrumental development and applications , 2001 .

[9]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Variability in Particle Emission Measurements in the Heavy Duty Transient Test , 1991 .

[10]  A. Reineking,et al.  Calibration of a TSI model 3025 ultrafine condensation particle counter , 1991 .

[11]  D. Kittelson,et al.  The influence of dilution conditions on diesel exhaust particle size distribution measurements , 1999 .

[12]  R. W. Waytulonis,et al.  Chemical analysis of diesel engine nanoparticles using a nano-DMA/thermal desorption particle beam mass spectrometer. , 2001, Environmental science & technology.

[13]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Nanoparticle emissions on Minnesota highways , 2004 .

[14]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  GASOLINE VEHICLE PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS: COMPARISON OF STEADY STATE, FTP, AND US06 MEASUREMENTS , 1999 .

[15]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Source apportionment of diesel and spark ignition exhaust aerosol using on-road data from the Minneapolis metropolitan area , 2005 .

[16]  D. Kittelson Engines and nanoparticles: a review , 1998 .

[17]  H. Burtscher Measurement and characteristics of combustion aerosols with special consideration of photoelectric charging and charging by flame ions , 1992 .

[18]  U. Matter,et al.  DYNAMIC FIELD MEASUREMENTS OF SUBMICRON PARTICLES FROM DIESEL ENGINES , 1999 .

[19]  Qiang Wei,et al.  Diesel Exhaust Particle Size: Measurement Issues and Trends , 1998 .

[20]  A. P. Walker,et al.  On-road evaluation of two Diesel exhaust aftertreatment devices , 2006 .

[21]  Nick Collings,et al.  A Fast Response Particulate Spectrometer for Combustion Aerosols , 2002 .

[22]  Kenneth L. Rubow,et al.  A Microorifice Uniform Deposit Impactor (MOUDI): Description, Calibration, and Use , 1991 .

[23]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  The Aerosol Size Distribution of Los Angeles Smog , 1972 .

[24]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Diesel Trap Performance: Particle Size Measurements and Trends , 1998 .

[25]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF THE ELECTRICAL LOW-PRESSURE IMPACTOR (ELPI) , 2000 .

[26]  H. Burtscher,et al.  Real-time characterization of ultrafine and accumulation mode particles in ambient combustion aerosols , 2002 .

[27]  Alberto Ayala,et al.  Estimation of Diffusion Losses when Sampling Diesel Aerosol: A Quality Assurance Measure , 2003 .

[28]  Richard E. Chase,et al.  Examination of the Size-Resolved and Transient Nature of Motor Vehicle Particle Emissions , 1999 .

[29]  K. Siegmann,et al.  Physical and chemical properties of airborne nanoscale particles and how to measure the impact on human health , 1998 .

[30]  K. T. Whitby,et al.  The minnesota aerosol-analyzing system used in the Los Angeles smog project , 1972 .

[31]  C. Goodfellow,et al.  A Study of the Size, Number and Mass Distribution of the Automotive ParticulateEmissions from European Light Duty Vehicles , 1998 .

[32]  Simone Hochgreb,et al.  MECHANISMS OF PARTICULATE MATTER FORMATION IN SPARK-IGNITION ENGINES. 1: EFFECT OF ENGINE OPERATING CONDITIONS , 1999 .

[33]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  On-line measurements of diesel nanoparticle composition and volatility , 2003 .

[34]  David B Kittelson,et al.  Size-dependent mixing characteristics of volatile and nonvolatile components in diesel exhaust aerosols. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[35]  David B. Kittelson,et al.  Single-Stage Dilution Tunnel Performance , 2001 .

[36]  D. Kittelson,et al.  The Influence of Engine Lubricating Oil on Diesel Nanoparticle Emissions and Kinetics of Oxidation , 2003 .

[37]  S. Friedlander,et al.  Smoke, Dust and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Behavior , 1977 .

[38]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Deposition, diffusion and adsorption in the diesel oxidation catalyst , 1996 .

[39]  K. Baumgard,et al.  Characterization of fuel and aftertreatment device effects on diesel emissions. , 1996, Research report.

[40]  D. Kittelson,et al.  DIESEL EXHAUST PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTIONS - FUEL AND ADDITIVE EFFECTS. , 1978 .

[41]  Jorma Keskinen,et al.  Electrical low pressure impactor , 1992 .

[42]  D. Kittelson,et al.  Real time measurement of volatile and solid exhaust particles using a catalytic stripper , 1995 .

[43]  Detlef Hummes,et al.  Experimental Comparison of Four Differential Mobility Analyzers for Nanometer Aerosol Measurements , 1996 .

[44]  Imad A. Khalek,et al.  Nanoparticle growth during dilution and cooling of diesel exhaust: Experimental investigation and theoretical assessment , 2000 .

[45]  Heinz Burtscher,et al.  GASOLINE VEHICLE EXHAUST PARTICLE SAMPLING STUDY , 2003 .