Acceptable peak forces and impulses during manual hose insertions in the automobile industry

Abstract Fifteen female subjects (21–59 years) were trained to execute simulated automobile hose insertion tasks using a psychophysical approach. Tasks were performed at 3 frequencies and in 5 postures. Subjects were instructed to apply their maximum acceptable force, during 750 ms, static insertion efforts, performed repetitively for 18 h of training and 9 h of testing. Maximum acceptable peak forces and impulses were calculated from the last 20 min of testing. Average within-subject coefficients of variation for acceptable peak forces and impulses were 9.0% and 8.1%, respectively. Mean acceptable peak forces for the pull back condition were 46% greater than those in the medial push far reach condition and decreased, on average, as exertion frequency increased. An average decrease of 17% was observed, across all postures, as frequency increased from 1 to 5 insertions/min. A significant main effect for posture was also found for acceptable impulse, following a similar trend as peak force. Subjects selected acceptable forces that were an average of 63% of their maximum voluntary effort, when averaged across all postures at a frequency of 1 per minute. Relevance to industry The current study provides maximal acceptable peak forces and impulses for females during rubber hose installations in automotive manufacturing. These data can be employed to establish tolerance limit values for females to reduce the incidence of injury associated with hose installation tasks, as well as ensuring quality.

[1]  S H Snook,et al.  Psychophysical considerations in permissible loads. , 1985, Ergonomics.

[2]  S H Snook,et al.  Maximum acceptable forces for repetitive ulnar deviation of the wrist. , 1997, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  Jim Chiang,et al.  A psychophysical study to determine acceptable limits for repetitive hand impact severity during automotive trim installation , 2000 .

[4]  Jalaluddin B. Dahalan,et al.  Psychophysical frequency for a gripping task , 1993 .

[5]  S H Snook,et al.  Psychophysical study of six hand movements , 2001, Ergonomics.

[6]  R. J. Marley,et al.  Psychophysical frequency and sustained exertion at varying wrist postures for a drilling task. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[7]  J E Fernandez,et al.  Maximum acceptable frequencies for females performing a drilling task in different wrist postures. , 1994, Journal of human ergology.

[8]  T Shin Automatic assembly technique for VC hose , 1998 .

[9]  Gaurav Suri,et al.  Evaluation Metrics for the Rating and Optimization of Snap-fits , 2000 .

[10]  Stover H. Snook,et al.  The Ergonomics Society The Society's Lecture 1978. THE DESIGN OF MANUAL HANDLING TASKS , 1978 .

[11]  S H Snook,et al.  Psychophysical studies of repetitive wrist flexion and extension. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[12]  Allison Stephens,et al.  Maximal acceptable forces for manual insertions using a pulp pinch, oblique grasp and finger press , 2006 .

[13]  S H Snook,et al.  Maximum weights and work loads acceptable to male industrial workers. A study of lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling, carrying, and walking tasks. , 1970, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[14]  S H Snook,et al.  The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. , 1991, Ergonomics.

[15]  W Karwowski,et al.  Reliability of the psychophysical approach to manual lifting of liquids by females. , 1986, Ergonomics.