Computer systems to facilitating organizational learning: IT and organizational context

Abstract A comprehensive model that delineates the interrelationships among computer systems, organizational context and organizational learning is absent. This study aims to fill this void. Unlike previous research, this study investigates the role of computer systems, i.e. organizational learning computer systems (OLCS), in facilitating organizational learning. In our framework, we argued that contextual variables mediated the impact of OLCS on organizational learning. In order to test the feasibility of this framework, we conducted an empirical study. This study employed a survey instrument, which contained data collected from 500 organizations in manufacturing, service industry, and academic institutions. A total of 165 usable responses were analyzed. The results indicate that OLCS have a positive impact on the organizational learning processes. Both ‘problem characteristic’ and ‘organizational culture’ moderate the influence of OLCS on organizational learning. The implications of the study are provided, and future research is suggested.

[1]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[2]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Computing and change on campus , 1987 .

[3]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[4]  Wanda J. Orlikowski.  Learning from Notes: Organizational Issues in Groupware Implementation , 1993, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Louis E. Raho,et al.  Assimilating New Technology into the Organization: An Assessment of McFarlan and McKenney's Model , 1987, MIS Q..

[6]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Information technology and organizational learning: a review and assessment of research , 2000 .

[7]  Paul S. Goodman,et al.  Computer-Aided Systems and Communities: Mechanisms for Organizational Learning in Distributed Environments , 1998, MIS Q..

[8]  Chris Argyris.  Education for leading-learning , 1993 .

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[10]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Task Requirements and Media Choice in Collaborative Writing , 1992, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  J. L. Price,et al.  Handbook of Organizational Measurement , 1975 .

[12]  Hemant K. Jain,et al.  Success of Data Resource Management in Distributed Environments: An Empirical Investigation , 1998, MIS Q..

[13]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[14]  Judy E. Scott.  Facilitating Interorganizational Learning with Information Technology , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  T. Hernes.  Flexible learning systems and obsolete organization structures: steps towards bridging the gap , 1999 .

[16]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[17]  Sara Kiesler,et al.  Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication , 1984 .

[18]  J. Dutton,et al.  Keeping An Eye on the Mirror: Image and Identity In Organizational Adaptation , 1991 .

[19]  V. Clark,et al.  Computer-aided multivariate analysis , 1991 .

[20]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[21]  Lorne Olfman,et al.  Organizational Memory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[22]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Voice messaging, coordination, and communication , 1990 .

[23]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[24]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .