Flood design recipes vs. reality: can predictions for ungauged basins be trusted?

Abstract. Despite the great scientific and technological advances in flood hydrology, everyday engineering practices still follow simplistic approaches that are easy to formally implement in ungauged areas. In general, these "recipes" have been developed many decades ago, based on field data from typically few experimental catchments. However, many of them have been neither updated nor validated across all hydroclimatic and geomorphological conditions. This has an obvious impact on the quality and reliability of hydrological studies, and, consequently, on the safety and cost of the related flood protection works. Preliminary results, based on historical flood data from Cyprus and Greece, indicate that a substantial revision of many aspects of flood engineering procedures is required, including the regionalization formulas as well as the modelling concepts themselves. In order to provide a consistent design framework and to ensure realistic predictions of the flood risk (a key issue of the 2007/60/EU Directive) in ungauged basins, it is necessary to rethink the current engineering practices. In this vein, the collection of reliable hydrological data would be essential for re-evaluating the existing "recipes", taking into account local peculiarities, and for updating the modelling methodologies as needed.

[1]  John D. Valiantzas,et al.  Investigation of the direct runoff generation mechanism for the analysis of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed , 2009 .

[2]  K. Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils , 1982 .

[3]  E. Kuichling,et al.  The Relation Between the Rainfall and the Discharge of Sewers in Populous Districts , 1889 .

[4]  Daniele Veneziano,et al.  The areal reduction factor: A multifractal analysis , 2005 .

[5]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  How extreme is extreme? An assessment of daily rainfall distribution tails , 2012 .

[6]  Christophe Bouvier,et al.  Flood modelling with a distributed event-based parsimonious rainfall-runoff model: case of the karstic Lez river catchment , 2012 .

[7]  V. Ponce,et al.  Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1996 .

[8]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Hydrometeorological network for flood monitoring and modeling , 2013, Other Conferences.

[9]  Keith Beven,et al.  Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling , 2000 .

[10]  A. Koussis,et al.  Assessment and review of the hydraulics of storage flood routing 70 years after the presentation of the Muskingum method , 2009 .

[11]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Design hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged watersheds: continuous simulation method versus event-based approach , 2012 .

[12]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Reconciling hydrology with engineering , 2014 .

[13]  Olav Slaymaker,et al.  Principles of Hydrology , 1968 .

[14]  Wayne C. Huber.  Discussion of “ Estimating Urban Time of Concentration ” by Richard H. McCuen, Stanley L. Wong, and Walter J. Rawls (July, 1984) , 1987 .

[15]  T. I. Eldho,et al.  An advanced soil moisture accounting procedure for SCS curve number method , 2007 .

[16]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  A continuous simulation model for design-hydrograph estimation in small and ungauged watersheds , 2012 .

[17]  C. Luce.  Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Synthesis Across Processes, Places and Scales , 2014 .

[18]  Richard H. McCuen,et al.  Uncertainty Analyses of Watershed Time Parameters , 2009 .

[19]  J. Hewlett.  Factors affecting the response of small watersheds to precipitation in humid areas , 1967 .

[20]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2. Upstream source areas , 1972 .

[21]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Where does water go when it rains? Moving beyond the variable source area concept of rainfall‐runoff response , 2003 .

[22]  Maurizio Porfiri,et al.  Time of concentration: a paradox in modern hydrology , 2012 .

[23]  Günter Blöschl,et al.  On the role of storm duration in the mapping of rainfall to flood return periods , 2008 .

[24]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Using globally available soil moisture indicators for flood modelling in Mediterranean catchments , 2013 .

[25]  R. Horton,et al.  The field, scope, and status of the science of hydrology , 1931 .

[26]  R. D. Black,et al.  Partial Area Contributions to Storm Runoff in a Small New England Watershed , 1970 .

[27]  Antonis D. Koussis,et al.  Reply to the Discussion of “Assessment and review of the hydraulics of storage flood routing 70 years after the presentation of the Muskingum method” by M. Perumal , 2010 .

[28]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Entropy based derivation of probability distributions: A case study to daily rainfall , 2012 .

[29]  R. Ward,et al.  Principles of Hydrology , 1968 .

[30]  Andreas Efstratiadis,et al.  Investigation of extreme flows in Cyprus: empirical formulas and regionalization approaches for peak flow estimation , 2011 .

[31]  C. Bryan Young,et al.  Empirical Determination of Rational Method Runoff Coefficients , 2009 .

[32]  R. Betson,et al.  What is watershed runoff , 1964 .

[33]  James Grant MacBroom.  Discussion of “Estimating Urban Time of Concentration” by Richard H. McCuen, Stanley L. Wong, and Walter J. Rawls (July, 1984) , 1987 .

[34]  W. G. Knisel.  Comments on ‘Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 2, upstream source areas’ by R. Allan Freeze , 1973 .

[35]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  An algorithm to construct Monte Carlo confidence intervals for an arbitrary function of probability distribution parameters , 2013, Comput. Stat..

[36]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  HESS Opinions: "Climate, hydrology, energy, water: recognizing uncertainty and seeking sustainability" , 2008 .

[37]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Analysis of a Long Record of Annual Maximum Rainfall in Athens, Greece, and Design Rainfall Inferences , 2000 .

[38]  J. McDonnell,et al.  A decade of Predictions in Ungauged Basins (PUB)—a review , 2013 .

[39]  Vazken Andréassian,et al.  Soil Conservation Service Curve Number method: How to mend a wrong soil moisture accounting procedure? , 2005 .

[40]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: I. Theoretical investigation / Statistiques de valeurs extrêmes et estimation de précipitations extrêmes: I. Recherche théorique , 2004 .

[41]  R. Allan Freeze,et al.  Role of subsurface flow in generating surface runoff: 1. Base flow contributions to channel flow , 1972 .

[42]  Demetris Koutsoyiannis,et al.  Statistics of extremes and estimation of extreme rainfall: II. Empirical investigation of long rainfall records / Statistiques de valeurs extrêmes et estimation de précipitations extrêmes: II. Recherche empirique sur de longues séries de précipitations , 2004 .

[43]  Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz,et al.  Large floods in Europe, 1985–2009 , 2013 .

[44]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[45]  Luca Brocca,et al.  Design soil moisture estimation by comparing continuous and storm‐based rainfall‐runoff modeling , 2011 .

[46]  K. Beven,et al.  A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology , 1979 .

[47]  Giorgio Boni,et al.  General calibration methodology for a combined Horton-SCS infiltration scheme in flash flood modeling , 2008 .

[48]  R. Woods,et al.  Catchment Classification and Hydrologic Similarity , 2006, Geography Compass.

[49]  Andrea Petroselli,et al.  Curve‐Number/Green–Ampt mixed procedure for streamflow predictions in ungauged basins: Parameter sensitivity analysis , 2013 .