The stochastic distribution of available coefficient of friction for human locomotion of five different floor surfaces.

The maximum coefficient of friction that can be supported at the shoe and floor interface without a slip is usually called the available coefficient of friction (ACOF) for human locomotion. The probability of a slip could be estimated using a statistical model by comparing the ACOF with the required coefficient of friction (RCOF), assuming that both coefficients have stochastic distributions. An investigation of the stochastic distributions of the ACOF of five different floor surfaces under dry, water and glycerol conditions is presented in this paper. One hundred friction measurements were performed on each floor surface under each surface condition. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit test was used to determine if the distribution of the ACOF was a good fit with the normal, log-normal and Weibull distributions. The results indicated that the ACOF distributions had a slightly better match with the normal and log-normal distributions than with the Weibull in only three out of 15 cases with a statistical significance. The results are far more complex than what had heretofore been published and different scenarios could emerge. Since the ACOF is compared with the RCOF for the estimate of slip probability, the distribution of the ACOF in seven cases could be considered a constant for this purpose when the ACOF is much lower or higher than the RCOF. A few cases could be represented by a normal distribution for practical reasons based on their skewness and kurtosis values without a statistical significance. No representation could be found in three cases out of 15.

[1]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 2: Survey of friction measurement devices , 2001, Ergonomics.

[2]  Wen-Ruey Chang A statistical model to estimate the probability of slip and fall incidents , 2004 .

[3]  Mark I. Marpet Improved characterization of tribometric test results , 2002 .

[4]  M S Redfern,et al.  Biomechanics of slips , 2001, Ergonomics.

[5]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  A methodology to quantify the stochastic distribution of friction coefficient required for level walking. , 2008, Applied ergonomics.

[6]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[7]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  Stochastic distribution of the required coefficient of friction for level walking - an in-depth study , 2012, Ergonomics.

[8]  M. Lesch,et al.  Visually based perceptions of slipperiness: Underlying cues, consistency and relationship to coefficient of friction , 2008, Ergonomics.

[9]  W R Chang,et al.  The role of friction in the measurement of slipperiness, Part 1: Friction mechanisms and definition of test conditions , 2001, Ergonomics.

[10]  W R Chang,et al.  The slip resistance of common footwear materials measured with two slipmeters. , 2001, Applied ergonomics.

[11]  J. Burnfield,et al.  Prediction of slips: an evaluation of utilized coefficient of friction and available slip resistance , 2006, Ergonomics.

[12]  Wen-Ruey Chang,et al.  The stochastic distribution of available coefficient of friction on quarry tiles for human locomotion. , 2012, Work.

[13]  Wen-Ruey Chang The effects of slip criterion and time on friction measurements , 2002 .

[14]  M S Redfern,et al.  Predicting slips and falls considering required and available friction. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[15]  Ralph Lipsey Barnett,et al.  “Slip and Fall” Theory—Extreme Order Statistics , 2002, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.