Puzzle based teaching versus traditional instruction in electrocardiogram interpretation for medical students – a pilot study

BackgroundMost medical professionals are expected to possess basic electrocardiogram (EKG) interpretation skills. But, published data suggests that residents' and physicians' EKG interpretation skills are suboptimal. Learning styles differ among medical students; individualization of teaching methods has been shown to be viable and may result in improved learning. Puzzles have been shown to facilitate learning in a relaxed environment. The objective of this study was to assess efficacy of teaching puzzle in EKG interpretation skills among medical students.MethodsThis is a reader blinded crossover trial. Third year medical students from College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University participated in this study. Two groups (n = 9) received two traditional EKG interpretation skills lectures followed by a standardized exam and two extra sessions with the teaching puzzle and a different exam. Two other groups (n = 6) received identical courses and exams with the puzzle session first followed by the traditional teaching. EKG interpretation scores on final test were used as main outcome measure.ResultsThe average score after only traditional teaching was 4.07 ± 2.08 while after only the puzzle session was 4.04 ± 2.36 (p = 0.97). The average improvement after the traditional session was followed up with a puzzle session was 2.53 ± 1.94 while the average improvement after the puzzle session was followed with the traditional session was 2.08 ± 1.73 (p = 0.67). The final EKG exam score for this cohort (n = 15) was 84.1 compared to 86.6 (p = 0.22) for a comparable sample of medical students (n = 15) at a different campus.ConclusionTeaching EKG interpretation with puzzles is comparable to traditional teaching and may be particularly useful for certain subgroups of students. Puzzle session are more interactive and relaxing, and warrant further investigations on larger scale.

[1]  Henk G. Schmidt,et al.  The psychological basis of problem-based learning , 1985 .

[2]  Geoffrey R Norman,et al.  Practice Makes Perfect: The Critical Role of Mixed Practice in the Acquisition of ECG Interpretation Skills , 2003, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[3]  A. Hoes,et al.  Diagnostic interpretation of electrocardiograms in population-based research: computer program research physicians, or cardiologists? , 1997, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  S E DiCarlo,et al.  Educational card games for understanding gastrointestinal physiology. , 1998, The American journal of physiology.

[5]  James A. Gordon,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation-Based Teaching versus Traditional Instruction in Medicine: A Pilot Study among Clinical Medical Students , 2006, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[6]  S. Margolis,et al.  EKG analysis skills of family practice residents in the United Arab Emirates: a comparison with US data. , 2001, Family medicine.

[7]  J. Guilbert,et al.  The need for more efficacy and relevance in medical education , 1996, Medical education.

[8]  D. Wood.  Problem based learning : Time to stop arguing about the process and examine the outcomes , 2008 .

[9]  T. Lauritzen,et al.  Electrocardiogram interpretation in general practice. , 2004, Family practice.

[10]  Robert L. Vogel,et al.  Are Family Practice Residents Able to Interpret Electrocardiograms? , 2003, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[11]  J A Spencer,et al.  Learner centred approaches in medical education , 1999, BMJ.

[12]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[13]  Y. Lim,et al.  “False-positive” cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction , 2009 .

[14]  H. Schmidt,et al.  The advantages of problem-based curricula. , 1996, Postgraduate medical journal.

[15]  M. Mikus,et al.  Accuracy of electrocardiogram reading by family practice residents. , 2000, Family medicine.

[16]  N. Goldschlager,et al.  Overreliance on computerized algorithms to interpret electrocardiograms. , 2004, The American journal of medicine.

[17]  H. Schmidt,et al.  The psychological basis of problem‐based learning: a review of the evidence , 1992, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[18]  S. Salerno,et al.  Competency in Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: A Summary and Appraisal of Published Evidence , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[19]  R. J. Hoyle,et al.  Accuracy of electrocardiogram interpretation improves with emergency medicine training , 2007, Emergency medicine Australasia : EMA.

[20]  I. McManus,et al.  Stress, burnout and doctors' attitudes to work are determined by personality and learning style: A twelve year longitudinal study of UK medical graduates , 2004, BMC medicine.

[21]  L Edenbrandt,et al.  A confident decision support system for interpreting electrocardiograms. , 1999, Clinical physiology.

[22]  S. Salerno,et al.  Training and Competency Evaluation for Interpretation of 12-Lead Electrocardiograms: Recommendations from the American College of Physicians* , 2003, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[23]  D. Allen,et al.  What is Problem-Based Learning? , 2006 .

[24]  Douglas B. Fridsma,et al.  Research Paper: Computer Decision Support as a Source of Interpretation Error: The Case of Electrocardiograms , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[25]  S Petersen,et al.  Time for evidence based medical education , 1999, BMJ.

[26]  John D'Angelo,et al.  Competency in electrocardiogram interpretation among internal medicine and emergency medicine residents. , 2005, The American journal of medicine.

[27]  O Pahlm,et al.  Comparison of teaching the basic electrocardiographic concept of frontal plane QRS axis using the classical versus the orderly electrocardiogram limb lead displays. , 1997, American heart journal.