Does Excellence have a Gender? A National Research Study on Recruitment and Selection Procedures for Professorial Appointments in the Netherlands

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to show that upward mobility of female academics in regular selection procedures is evolving extremely slowly, especially in The Netherlands. This paper aims at a more profound understanding of professorial recruitment and selection procedures in relation to gender differences at Dutch universities.Design/methodology/approach – This paper explores the recruitment of university professors as a gendered process and is mainly based on the analysis of selection committee reports between 1999‐2003 from six large Dutch universities (n=682).Findings – The research findings give a clear indication of gender differences in selection and recruitment procedures. Although not in all disciplines, the paper observes a disparity in the percentages of male and female applicants who were successful in the selection procedure. There is no confirmation of the predicted relationship with the nature of the procedure (open/closed), but there is a correlation with the number of women on...

[1]  P. Lawrence The politics of publication , 2003, Nature.

[2]  Jiing-Lih Farh,et al.  A field study of race and age similarity effects on interview ratings in conventional and situational interviews , 1992 .

[3]  H. Harris Think international manager, think male: Why are women not selected for international management assignments? , 2002 .

[4]  H. Zuckerman,et al.  The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community , 1991 .

[5]  Liisa Husu,et al.  Gender Discrimination in the Promised Land of Gender Equality , 2000 .

[6]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[7]  K. K. Cetina Epistemic Cultures: How the Sciences Make Knowledge , 1999 .

[8]  David Knights,et al.  Managing to discriminate , 1990 .

[9]  Reid Bates Liking and similarity as predictors of multi‐source ratings , 2002 .

[10]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Increasing productivity through performance appraisal , 1981 .

[11]  N. Adler Competitive Frontiers: Women Managers in the Triad , 1993 .

[12]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender and professional category of scientists , 2003, Scientometrics.

[13]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The underrepresentation of women in science: differential commitment or the queen bee syndrome? , 2004, The British journal of social psychology.

[14]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[15]  Y. Benschop,et al.  Crumbling Ivory Towers: Academic Organizing and its Gender Effects , 2003 .

[16]  R. Steinpreis,et al.  The Impact of Gender on the Review of the Curricula Vitae of Job Applicants and Tenure Candidates: A National Empirical Study , 1999 .

[17]  M. Curran Gender and Recruitment: People and Places in the Labour Market , 1988 .

[18]  M.L.M. Brouns,et al.  The gendered nature of assessment procedures in scientific research funding. The case of the Dutch Organisation for Scientific Research , 2000 .

[19]  B. Reskin,et al.  Job Queues, Gender Queues: Explaining Women's Inroads into Male Occupations , 1990 .

[20]  Michael S. Cole,et al.  Interaction of Recruiter and Applicant Gender in Resume Evaluation: A Field Study , 2004 .

[21]  Mari Teigen,et al.  The suitable few: managerial recruitment practices in the Norwegian state bureaucracy , 2002 .

[22]  D F Horrobin,et al.  The philosophical basis of peer review and the suppression of innovation. , 1990, JAMA.

[23]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Overcoming Isolation: Women's Dilemmas in American Academic Science , 2001 .

[24]  T. Jefferson,et al.  Measuring the quality of editorial peer review. , 2002, JAMA.

[25]  Barbara Bagilhole,et al.  The Contradiction of the Myth of Individual Merit, and the Reality of a Patriarchal Support System in Academic Careers , 2001 .

[26]  Jennifer D. Rubin Gender, Equality and the Culture of Organizational Assessment , 1997 .