Double oscillatory mode compensation by inverse signal shaper with distributed delays

Signal shaping technique can be distinguished as a very effective tool for suppressing both single and multiple oscillatory modes of a system linked with the shaper. Utilizing the concept of inverse signal shapers placed in the feedback loop, the double oscillatory mode suppression is addressed, considering that the oscillations induced by both the reference signal and the disturbance changes are to be compensated. In order to avoid the closed loop neutrality of the dynamics, the lumped delay that is usually considered in the shaper structure is substituted by a distributed delay. Next to the theoretical analysis, both the numerical and experimental examples are included.

[1]  William Singhose,et al.  EXTRA-INSENSITIVE INPUT SHAPERS FOR CONTROLLING FLEXIBLE SPACECRAFT , 1996 .

[2]  W.J. Book,et al.  Adaptive time-delay command shaping filter for flexible manipulator control , 2004, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[3]  John Y. Hung.  Feedback control with Posicast , 2003, IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron..

[4]  Vicente Feliú Batlle,et al.  Adaptive input shaping for manoeuvring flexible structures using an algebraic identification technique , 2009, Autom..

[5]  Sun Yi,et al.  Time-Delay Systems: Analysis and Control Using the Lambert W Function , 2010 .

[6]  Zhang Peng,et al.  Vibration control of flexible structure with multiple modes using input shaping , 2009, 2009 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[7]  Tomás Vyhlídal,et al.  Zero vibration shapers with distributed delays of various types , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Tomás Vyhlídal,et al.  Spectral features of ZVD shapers with lumped and distributed delays , 2013, 2013 9th Asian Control Conference (ASCC).

[9]  T. Singh,et al.  Design of closed-loop input shaping controllers , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[10]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  Preshaping Command Inputs to Reduce System Vibration , 1990 .

[11]  S. S. Gürleyük,et al.  Robust Three-impulse Sequence Input Shaper Design , 2007 .

[12]  Lisa J. Porter,et al.  Vibration Reduction Using Multi-Hump Extra-Insensitive Input Shapers , 1995 .

[13]  Juyi Park,et al.  Design of learning input shaping technique for residual vibration suppression in an industrial robot , 2006, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[14]  William Singhose,et al.  Performance studies of human operators driving double-pendulum bridge cranes , 2010 .

[15]  Tomás Vyhlídal,et al.  Inverse signal shapers in effective feedback architecture , 2013, 2013 European Control Conference (ECC).

[16]  Michael H. Kenison,et al.  Input Shaping Control of Double-Pendulum Bridge Crane Oscillations , 2008 .

[17]  Tomás Vyhlídal,et al.  Signal shaper with a distributed delay: Spectral analysis and design , 2013, Autom..

[18]  William Singhose,et al.  Useful applications of closed-loop signal shaping controllers , 2008 .

[19]  William Singhose,et al.  Comparison of robust input shapers , 2008 .

[20]  Otto J. M. Smith,et al.  Feedback control systems , 1958 .

[21]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  Residual Vibration Reduction Using Vector Diagrams to Generate Shaped Inputs , 1994 .

[22]  William Singhose,et al.  Robustness analysis of input shaping commands for two-mode flexible systems , 2009 .

[23]  William E. Singhose,et al.  Trends in the Stability Properties of CLSS Controllers: A Root-Locus Analysis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology.