Manual Sign Translucency and Referential Concreteness in the Learning of Signs

The transmission and interpretation of manual signs consist of the sign productions and the comprehension of the referents which the signs represent. Signs are translucent to the degree that an observer can perceive a relationship between a sign and its referent. Likewise, a referent is said to be concrete or abstract, depending on whether the referent can be envisioned in a psychological image. The present study investigated sign learning as a function of sign translucency and referential concreteness. Translucency and concreteness levels were varied, and naive sign language learners attempted to learn a list of signreferent pairs. The results indicated that signs high in translucency and referents high in concreteness facilitated learning, while low levels of each variable inhibited list learning. Mixed conditions led to intermediate learning performance. Implications for choosing initial sign lexicons for severely language-impaired, non-deaf populations (e.g. the mentally retarded) are discussed.

[1]  A. Paivio,et al.  Noun imagery and meaningfulness in free and serial recall , 1969 .

[2]  Mental elaboration and learning in EMR children. , 1972, American journal of mental deficiency.

[3]  R. Battison,et al.  A Referential Communication Experiment with Foreign Sign Languages , 2013 .

[4]  I. Breger,et al.  Perception of Sign Language of the Deaf , 1970, Perceptual and motor skills.

[5]  E. Klima The signs of language , 1979 .

[6]  J. Bowers,et al.  Another stab at “meaning”: Concreteness, iconicity, and conventionality , 1973 .

[7]  A. Paivio,et al.  The associative learning of the deaf: The effects of word imagery and signability , 1975, Memory & cognition.

[8]  H. Hoemann The development of communication skills in deaf and hearing children. , 1972, Child development.

[9]  K. Nelson,et al.  Languages and Language-Related Skills in Deaf and Hearing Children , 2013 .

[10]  M. F. Cleugh,et al.  Handbook of mental deficiency , 1963 .

[11]  A. D. Yarmey,et al.  The role of imagery in incidental learning of educable retarded and normal children. , 1972, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[12]  Modality-specific imagery and associative learning in the deaf and hearing , 1974 .

[13]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concrete image and verbal memory codes , 1969 .

[14]  D. Foth Mnemonic Technique Effectiveness as a Function of Word Abstractness and Mediation Instructions. , 1973 .

[15]  Allan Paivio,et al.  Word imagery modalities and associative learning in blind and sighted subjects , 1971 .

[16]  H. Hoemann The Transparency of Meaning of Sign Language Gestures , 2013 .

[17]  Word imagery modalities and learning in the deaf and hearing. , 1976, The Journal of psychology.

[18]  Nancy J. Frishberg ARBITRARINESS AND ICONICITY: HISTORICAL CHANGE IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE , 1975 .

[19]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Ian Begg,et al.  Imagery and long-term retention , 1973 .