Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Public discourse on current inequalities often invokes past injustice endured by minorities. This rhetoric also sometimes underlies contemporary equality policies. Drawing on social identity theory and the employment equity literature, we suggest that reminding people about past injustice against a disadvantaged group (e.g., women) can invoke social identity threat among advantaged group members (e.g., men) and undermine support for employment equity (EE) policies by fostering the belief that inequality no longer exists. We find support for our hypotheses in four studies examining Canadian (three studies) and American (one study) EE policies. Overall, we found that reminders of past injustice toward women undermined men’s support for an EE policy promoting women by heightening their denial of current gender discrimination. Supporting a social identity account, men’s responses were mediated by collective self-esteem, and were attenuated when threat was mitigated. Reminders of past injustice did not influence women’s support for the EE policy.

[1]  N. Ellemers,et al.  Suffering from the possibility of status loss: Physiological responses to social identity threat in high status groups. , 2009 .

[2]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  Remembering historical victimization: collective guilt for current ingroup transgressions. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  E. Knowles,et al.  How believing in affirmative action quotas protects White men's self-esteem , 2007 .

[4]  Ivona Hideg,et al.  Support for employment equity policies: A self-enhancement approach , 2014 .

[5]  Anne E Wilson,et al.  Acknowledging the Skeletons in Our Closet , 2011, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[6]  Robert Stalnaker Context And Content , 1999 .

[7]  Krista Casler,et al.  Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon's MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  J. Crocker,et al.  A Collective Self-Esteem Scale: Self-Evaluation of One's Social Identity , 1992 .

[9]  P. Devine,et al.  More Eyes on the Prize: Variability in White Americans' Perceptions of Progress Toward Racial Equality , 2008, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[10]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  When the pressure is up: The assessment of social identity threat in low and high status groups , 2005 .

[11]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[12]  G. A. Kleef,et al.  When expressions of fake emotions elicit negative reactions: The role of observers' dialectical thinking , 2017 .

[13]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Thou shalt not discriminate: How emphasizing moral ideals rather than obligations increases Whites' support for social equality , 2011 .

[14]  Bertjan Doosje,et al.  Self and social identity. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[15]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  Attitudes and beliefs about affirmative action: effects of target and of respondent sex and ethnicity , 1993 .

[16]  T. Sowell Affirmative Action Around the World: An Empirical Study , 2004 .

[17]  Michael Ross,et al.  Group Identification and Historical Memory , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[18]  Richard P. Eibach,et al.  “Keep Your Eyes on the Prize”: Reference Points and Racial Differences in Assessing Progress Toward Equality , 2006, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[19]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  The context and content of social identity threat , 1999 .

[20]  Michael J. A. Wohl,et al.  The past as a determinant of the present: Historical continuity, collective angst, and opposition to immigration , 2012 .

[21]  C. Leach,et al.  White Guilt and Racial Compensation: The Benefits and Limits of Self-Focus , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[22]  David A. Kravitz,et al.  Understanding attitudes toward affirmative action programs in employment: summary and meta-analysis of 35 years of research. , 2006, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  Herman Aguinis,et al.  Best Practice Recommendations for Designing and Implementing Experimental Vignette Methodology Studies , 2014 .

[24]  Anca M. Miron,et al.  Interpreting the Ingroup's Negative Actions Toward Another Group: Emotional Reactions to Appraised Harm. , 2004 .

[25]  Brenda L. Hazard Separate But Equal? A Comparison of Content on Library Web Pages and Their Text Versions , 2008 .

[26]  L. Jussim,et al.  The Accumulation of Stereotype-Based Self-Fulfilling Prophecies , 2018, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  Nicole M. Stephens,et al.  Opting Out or Denying Discrimination? How the Framework of Free Choice in American Society Influences Perceptions of Gender Inequality , 2011, Psychological science.

[29]  Ivona Hideg,et al.  The Unintended Consequences of Maternity Leaves: How Agency Interventions Mitigate the Negative Effects of Longer Legislated Maternity Leaves , 2018, The Journal of applied psychology.

[30]  A. Brief,et al.  Prejudice matters: understanding the reactions of Whites to affirmative action programs targeted to benefit Blacks. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[31]  Alexandra Kalev,et al.  Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies , 2006 .

[32]  Cheryl R. Kaiser,et al.  Presumed fair: ironic effects of organizational diversity structures. , 2013, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  A. Meade,et al.  Identifying careless responses in survey data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[34]  Richard P. Eibach,et al.  Equality " Keep Your Eyes on the Prize " : Reference Points and Racial Differences in Assessing Progress Toward , 2013 .

[35]  B. Weiner,et al.  Reflections on Affirmative Action Goals in Psychology Admissions , 1995 .

[36]  Ivona Hideg,et al.  Overcoming negative reactions of nonbeneficiaries to employment equity: the effect of participation in policy formulation. , 2011, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  F. Crosby,et al.  Understanding affirmative action. , 2006, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  James H. Liu,et al.  Social Representations of History and the Legitimation of Social Inequality: The Causes and Consequences of Historical Negation1 , 2012 .

[39]  Johanna Peetz,et al.  Crimes of the Past: Defensive Temporal Distancing in the Face of Past In-Group Wrongdoing , 2010, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[40]  Ivona Hideg,et al.  The compassionate sexist? How benevolent sexism promotes and undermines gender equality in the workplace. , 2016, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Organizational justice and Black applicants' reactions to affirmative action. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  Deborah L. Kidder,et al.  Backlash Toward Diversity Initiatives: Examining the Impact of Diversity Program Justicfication, Personal, and Group Outcomes , 2004 .

[43]  Richard P. Eibach,et al.  Reference Points in Men’s and Women’s Judgments of Progress Toward Gender Equality , 2010 .

[44]  P. Bliese Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[45]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Life after P-Hacking , 2013 .

[46]  Girardeau A. Spann The Law of Affirmative Action: Twenty Five Years of Supreme Court Decisions on Race and Remedies , 2000 .

[47]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[48]  Miguel M. Unzueta,et al.  How believing in affirmative action quotas affects White women’s self-image , 2010 .

[49]  Ivona Hideg,et al.  Dialectical Thinking and Fairness-Based Perspectives of Affirmative Action , 2017, The Journal of applied psychology.

[50]  Robyn K. Mallett,et al.  Understanding Subtle Sexism: Detection and Use of Sexist Language , 2004 .

[51]  Linley Hartmann,et al.  Gender Differences in Attitudes Toward Affirmative Action Programs in Australia: Effects of Beliefs, Interests, and Attitudes Toward Women , 2001 .

[52]  Michelle K. Ryan,et al.  Quotas and affirmative action: Understanding group-based outcomes and attitudes , 2018 .