Applying particle filtering in both aggregated and age-structured population compartmental models of pre-vaccination measles

Measles is a highly transmissible disease and is one of the leading causes of death among young children under 5 globally. While the use of ongoing surveillance data and – recently – dynamic models offer insight on measles dynamics, both suffer notable shortcomings when applied to measles outbreak prediction. In this paper, we apply the Sequential Monte Carlo approach of particle filtering, incorporating reported measles incidence for Saskatchewan during the pre-vaccination era, using an adaptation of a previously contributed measles compartmental model. To secure further insight, we also perform particle filtering on an age structured adaptation of the model in which the population is divided into two interacting age groups – children and adults. The results indicate that, when used with a suitable dynamic model, particle filtering can offer high predictive capacity for measles dynamics and outbreak occurrence in a low vaccination context. We have investigated five particle filtering models in this project. Based on the most competitive model as evaluated by predictive accuracy, we have performed prediction and outbreak classification analysis. The prediction results demonstrated that this model could predict the measles transmission patterns and classify whether there will be an outbreak or not in the next month (Area under the ROC Curve of 0.89). We conclude that anticipating the outbreak dynamics of measles in low vaccination regions by applying particle filtering with simple measles transmission models, and incorporating time series of reported case counts, is a valuable technique to assist public health authorities in estimating risk and magnitude of measles outbreaks. Such approach offer particularly strong value proposition for other pathogens with little-known dynamics, critical latent drivers, and in the context of the growing number of high-velocity electronic data sources. Strong additional benefits are also likely to be realized from extending the application of this technique to highly vaccinated populations. Author summary Measles is a highly infectious disease and is one of the leading causes of death among young children globally. In 2016, close to 90,000 people died from measles. Measles can cause outbreaks particularly in people who did not receive protective vaccine. Understanding how measles outbreaks unfold can help public health agencies to design intervention strategies to prevent and control this potentially deadly infection. Although traditional methods – including the use of ongoing monitoring of infectious diseases trends by public health agencies and simulation of such trends using scientific technique of mathematical modeling – offer insight on measles dynamics, both have shortcomings when applied to our ability to predict measles outbreaks. We seek to enhance the accuracy with which we can understand the current measles disease burden as well as number of individuals who may develop measles because of lack of protection and predict future measles trends. We do this by applying a machine learning technique that combines the best features of insights from ongoing observations and mathematical models while minimizing important weaknesses of each. Our results indicate that, coupled with a suitable mathematical model, this technique can predict future measles trends and measles outbreaks in areas with low vaccination coverage.

[1]  Wee Peng Tay,et al.  A particle filter for sequential infection source estimation , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[2]  Richard K. Lomotey,et al.  Particle filtering in a SEIRV simulation model of H1N1 influenza , 2015, 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[3]  Andrew B Lawson,et al.  Statistical Methods in Medical Research , 2006 .

[4]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Kevin P. Murphy,et al.  Machine learning - a probabilistic perspective , 2012, Adaptive computation and machine learning series.

[6]  Shi Chen,et al.  Tracking measles infection through non‐linear state space models , 2012 .

[7]  Madhav V. Marathe,et al.  An Interactive, Web-Based High Performance Modeling Environment for Computational Epidemiology , 2014, ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[8]  James M. McCaw,et al.  Forecasting influenza outbreak dynamics in Melbourne from Internet search query surveillance data , 2016, Influenza and other respiratory viruses.

[9]  Joseph Dureau,et al.  Capturing the time-varying drivers of an epidemic using stochastic dynamical systems. , 2012, Biostatistics.

[10]  A. Cook,et al.  Real-Time Epidemic Monitoring and Forecasting of H1N1-2009 Using Influenza-Like Illness from General Practice and Family Doctor Clinics in Singapore , 2010, PloS one.

[11]  Edited by William Atkinson EPIDEMIOLOGY AND PREVENTION OF VACCINE-PREVENTABLE DISEASES , 2017 .

[12]  Foroogh S. Tabataba,et al.  Epidemic Forecasting Framework Combining Agent-Based Models and Smart Beam Particle Filtering , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM).

[13]  P. Kaye Infectious diseases of humans: Dynamics and control , 1993 .

[14]  Nathaniel D. Osgood,et al.  Towards closed loop modeling: Evaluating the prospects for creating recurrently regrounded aggregate simulation models using particle filtering , 2014, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference 2014.

[15]  Nathaniel D. Osgood,et al.  Particle filtering using agent-based transmission models , 2015, 2015 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[16]  Nicholas G. Polson,et al.  Tracking Epidemics With Google Flu Trends Data and a State-Space SEIR Model , 2012, Journal of the American Statistical Association.

[17]  Alicia Karspeck,et al.  Comparison of Filtering Methods for the Modeling and Retrospective Forecasting of Influenza Epidemics , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[18]  H. Hethcote,et al.  Measles and rubella in the United States. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  Mark Bartlett,et al.  Deterministic and Stochastic Models for Recurrent Epidemics , 1956 .

[20]  A. Doucet,et al.  A Tutorial on Particle Filtering and Smoothing: Fifteen years later , 2008 .

[21]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  Dynamics of measles epidemics: Estimating scaling of transmission rates using a time series sir model , 2002 .

[22]  Bryan T. Grenfell,et al.  Chance and Chaos in Measles Dynamics , 1992 .

[23]  Michael Isard,et al.  The CONDENSATION Algorithm - Conditional Density Propagation and Applications to Visual Tracking , 1996, NIPS.

[24]  W M Schaffer,et al.  Oscillations and chaos in epidemics: a nonlinear dynamic study of six childhood diseases in Copenhagen, Denmark. , 1988, Theoretical population biology.

[25]  Nathaniel D. Osgood,et al.  Combining Particle Filtering and Transmission Modeling for TB Control , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI).

[26]  D. Earn,et al.  A simple model for complex dynamical transitions in epidemics. , 2000, Science.

[27]  Herbert W. Hethcote,et al.  The Mathematics of Infectious Diseases , 2000, SIAM Rev..

[28]  Simon Cauchemez,et al.  new approach to characterising infectious disease transmission dynamics from entinel surveillance : Application to the Italian 2009 – 2010 A / H 1 N 1 influenza andemic , 2012 .

[29]  D. Schenzle An age-structured model of pre- and post-vaccination measles transmission. , 1984, IMA journal of mathematics applied in medicine and biology.

[30]  Timothy P. Hubbard,et al.  STOCHASTIC PROCESSES , ITÔ CALCULUS , AND APPLICATIONS IN ECONOMICS , 2006 .

[31]  H. Hethcote,et al.  An age-structured model for pertussis transmission. , 1997, Mathematical biosciences.

[32]  O. Bjørnstad,et al.  DYNAMICS OF MEASLES EPIDEMICS: SCALING NOISE, DETERMINISM, AND PREDICTABILITY WITH THE TSIR MODEL , 2002 .

[33]  Rob Deardon,et al.  Computational Statistics and Data Analysis Simulation-based Bayesian Inference for Epidemic Models , 2022 .