A test of the hierarchical model of litter decomposition

Our basic understanding of plant litter decomposition informs the assumptions underlying widely applied soil biogeochemical models, including those embedded in Earth system models. Confidence in projected carbon cycle–climate feedbacks therefore depends on accurate knowledge about the controls regulating the rate at which plant biomass is decomposed into products such as CO2. Here we test underlying assumptions of the dominant conceptual model of litter decomposition. The model posits that a primary control on the rate of decomposition at regional to global scales is climate (temperature and moisture), with the controlling effects of decomposers negligible at such broad spatial scales. Using a regional-scale litter decomposition experiment at six sites spanning from northern Sweden to southern France—and capturing both within and among site variation in putative controls—we find that contrary to predictions from the hierarchical model, decomposer (microbial) biomass strongly regulates decomposition at regional scales. Furthermore, the size of the microbial biomass dictates the absolute change in decomposition rates with changing climate variables. Our findings suggest the need for revision of the hierarchical model, with decomposers acting as both local- and broad-scale controls on litter decomposition rates, necessitating their explicit consideration in global biogeochemical models.Accurate understanding of plant litter decomposition is vital to inform Earth system modelling. Here the dominant hierarchical model for plant litter decomposition is found to be wanting, and revisions are suggested.

[1]  D. Wardle,et al.  Microclimate within litter bags of different mesh size: Implications for the 'arthropod effect' on litter decomposition , 2013 .

[2]  G. Bonan,et al.  Evaluating litter decomposition in earth system models with long‐term litterbag experiments: an example using the Community Land Model version 4 (CLM4) , 2013, Global change biology.

[3]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Resolving Ecosystem Complexity (MPB-47) , 2010 .

[4]  Scott T. Bates,et al.  Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Damir Čemerin,et al.  IV , 2011 .

[6]  N. T. Hobbs,et al.  Native predators reduce harvest of reindeer by Sámi pastoralists. , 2012, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[7]  A. Gelman,et al.  Rich State, Poor State, Red State, Blue State: What's the Matter with Connecticut? , 2005 .

[8]  R. Aerts.  Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems : a triangular relationship , 1997 .

[9]  M. Wallenstein,et al.  Climate change alters ecological strategies of soil bacteria. , 2014, Ecology letters.

[10]  William R. Wieder,et al.  Global soil carbon projections are improved by modelling microbial processes , 2013 .

[11]  W. Parton,et al.  Global decomposition experiment shows soil animal impacts on decomposition are climate-dependent , 2008, Global Change Biology.

[12]  V. Meentemeyer,et al.  Macroclimate and Lignin Control of Litter Decomposition Rates , 1978 .

[13]  M. Bradford,et al.  Climate history shapes contemporary leaf litter decomposition , 2015, Biogeochemistry.

[14]  S. Levin.  THE PROBLEM OF PATTERN AND SCALE IN ECOLOGY , 1992 .

[15]  Hongyan Luo,et al.  Spatial Variation in Soil Properties among North American Ecosystems and Guidelines for Sampling Designs , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  Understanding How Microbiomes Influence The Systems They Inhabit: Moving From A Correlative To A Causal Research Framework , 2018 .

[17]  H. Poorter,et al.  The fate of acquired carbon in plants: chemical composition and construction costs , 1997 .

[18]  J. P. Grime,et al.  Methods in Comparative Plant Ecology , 1993, Springer Netherlands.

[19]  Diana H. Wall,et al.  Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[20]  O. Sala,et al.  Long-Term Forage Production of North American Shortgrass Steppe. , 1992, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[21]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  A plant economics spectrum of litter decomposability , 2012 .

[22]  M. Bradford,et al.  Understanding How Microbiomes Influence The Systems They Inhabit: Moving From A Correlative To A Causal Research Framework , 2016, bioRxiv.

[23]  A. Gelman.  Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations , 2008, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  J. M. Oakes,et al.  Commentary: Individual, ecological and multilevel fallacies. , 2009, International journal of epidemiology.

[25]  M. Bradford,et al.  Do non-additive effects on decomposition in litter-mix experiments result from differences in resource quality between litters? , 2003 .

[26]  W. S. Robinson,et al.  Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. , 1950, International journal of epidemiology.

[27]  J. R. King,et al.  Climate fails to predict wood decomposition at regional scales , 2014 .

[28]  W. Wieder,et al.  Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition , 2016 .

[29]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed‐effects models , 2013 .

[30]  S. Allison,et al.  Microbial abundance and composition influence litter decomposition response to environmental change. , 2013, Ecology.

[31]  Christian Körner,et al.  Infra‐red thermometry of alpine landscapes challenges climatic warming projections , 2009 .

[32]  Petr Baldrian,et al.  Biotic interactions mediate soil microbial feedbacks to climate change , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Microbiota, fauna, and mesh size interactions in litter decomposition , 2002 .

[34]  R. Aerts,et al.  Consequences of biodiversity loss for litter decomposition across biomes , 2014, Nature.

[35]  J. P. E. AND-N.  A PHYSIOLOGICAL METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE MEASUREMENT OF MICROBIAL BIOMASS IN SOILS , 2022 .

[36]  J. Neff,et al.  Does adding microbial mechanisms of decomposition improve soil organic matter models? A comparison of four models using data from a pulsed rewetting experiment , 2009 .

[37]  J. Anderson,et al.  Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Studies in Ecology Vol. 5. , 1981 .

[38]  Oswald J. Schmitz,et al.  Resolving Ecosystem Complexity , 2010 .

[39]  M. Bradford,et al.  Disturbance Decouples Biogeochemical Cycles Across Forests of the Southeastern US , 2015, Ecosystems.

[40]  Joseph Hilbe,et al.  Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models , 2009 .

[41]  J. Chave.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology: what have we learned in 20 years? , 2013, Ecology letters.

[42]  Mark A. Bradford,et al.  Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology , 2010 .

[43]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[44]  J. Rousk.  Biomass or growth? How to measure soil food webs to understand structure and function , 2016 .

[45]  J. Powers,et al.  Scale-dependent variation in nitrogen cycling and soil fungal communities along gradients of forest composition and age in regenerating tropical dry forests. , 2016, The New phytologist.

[46]  M. Bradford,et al.  Litter quality impacts on grassland litter decomposition are differently dependent on soil fauna across time , 2003 .

[47]  T. Crowther,et al.  Environmental stress response limits microbial necromass contributions to soil organic carbon , 2015 .

[48]  Sandra Díaz,et al.  Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide. , 2008, Ecology letters.

[49]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Foliar pH as a new plant trait: can it explain variation in foliar chemistry and carbon cycling processes among subarctic plant species and types? , 2006, Oecologia.

[50]  R. Aerts,et al.  Highly consistent effects of plant litter identity and functional traits on decomposition across a latitudinal gradient. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[51]  R. Baayen,et al.  Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items , 2008 .

[52]  W. Wieder,et al.  Applying population and community ecology theory to advance understanding of belowground biogeochemistry. , 2017, Ecology letters.

[53]  R. O L A D A I R * W, W I L L I A,et al.  Simple three-pool model accurately describes patterns of long-term litter decomposition in diverse climates , 2008 .

[54]  Joshua P. Schimel,et al.  The implications of exoenzyme activity on microbial carbon and nitrogen limitation in soil: a theoretical model , 2003 .

[55]  Richard P. Phillips,et al.  Microbe-driventurnoverosetsminer al-mediated storage of soil carbon under elevated CO 2 , 2014 .

[56]  V. Meentemeyer,et al.  Litter mass loss rates in pine forests of Europe and Eastern United States: some relationships with climate and litter quality , 1993 .

[57]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Temperature and soil organic matter decomposition rates – synthesis of current knowledge and a way forward , 2011 .

[58]  W. Silver,et al.  Cross‐biome transplants of plant litter show decomposition models extend to a broader climatic range but lose predictability at the decadal time scale , 2009 .

[59]  M. Friedlander.  The Triangular Relationship , 2019, Sadat and Begin.

[60]  Mark E. Harmon,et al.  Long‐term patterns of mass loss during the decomposition of leaf and fine root litter: an intersite comparison , 2009 .

[61]  C. Hawkes,et al.  Historical precipitation predictably alters the shape and magnitude of microbial functional response to soil moisture , 2016, Global change biology.

[62]  M. Bradford,et al.  Microbial stoichiometry overrides biomass as a regulator of soil carbon and nitrogen cycling. , 2015, Ecology.

[63]  A A Schuessler,et al.  Ecological inference. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  J. Six,et al.  The temperature response of soil microbial efficiency and its feedback to climate , 2013 .

[65]  G. Robertson,et al.  Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research , 1999 .

[66]  Carl F. Salk,et al.  Decomposition in tropical forests: a pan‐tropical study of the effects of litter type, litter placement and mesofaunal exclusion across a precipitation gradient , 2009 .

[67]  N. Fierer,et al.  Influence of Drying–Rewetting Frequency on Soil Bacterial Community Structure , 2002, Microbial Ecology.

[68]  S. Waksman,et al.  COMPOSITION OF NATURAL ORGANIC MATERIALS AND THEIR DECOMPOSITION IN THE SOIL: IV. THE NATURE AND RAPIDITY OF DECOMPOSITION OF THE VARIOUS ORGANIC COMPLEXES IN DIFFERENT PLANT MATERIALS, UNDER AEROBIC CONDITIONS , 1929 .

[69]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[70]  William J. Riley,et al.  Weaker soil carbon–climate feedbacks resulting from microbial and abiotic interactions , 2015 .

[71]  J. Fyles,et al.  Litter decomposition rates in Canadian forests , 1999 .

[72]  N. Fierer,et al.  LITTER QUALITY AND THE TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY OF DECOMPOSITION , 2005 .