Kinematics of Reaching Movements in a 2-D Virtual Environment in Adults With and Without Stroke

Virtual reality environments are increasingly being used for upper limb rehabilitation in poststroke patients. Our goal was to determine if arm reaching movements made in a 2-D video-capture virtual reality environment are similar to those made in a comparable physical environment. We compared arm and trunk kinematics for reaches made with the right, dominant arm to three targets (14 trials per target) in both environments by 16 adults with right poststroke hemiparesis and by eight healthy age-matched controls. Movement kinematics were recorded with a three-camera optoelectronic system at 100 samples/s. Reaching movements made by both control and stroke subjects were affected by viewing the targets in the video-capture 2-D virtual environment. Movements were slower, shorter, less straight, less accurate and involved smaller ranges of shoulder and elbow joint excursions for target reaches in the virtual environment compared to the physical environment in all subjects. Thus, there was a decrease in the overall movement quality for movements made in the 2-D virtual environment. This suggests that 2-D video-capture virtual reality environments should be used with caution when the goal of the rehabilitation program is to improve the quality of movement patterns of the upper limb.

[1]  Brett A. Steinberg,et al.  Behavioral, anatomical, and physiological aspects of recovery of motor function following stroke , 1997, Brain Research Reviews.

[2]  U. Castiello The neuroscience of grasping , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[3]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Consistent haptic feedback is required but it is not enough for natural reaching to virtual cylinders. , 2008, Human movement science.

[4]  P. Pigeon,et al.  Recruitment and sequencing of different degrees of freedom during pointing movements involving the trunk in healthy and hemiparetic subjects , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  Video capture virtual reality: A decade of rehabilitation assessment and intervention , 2009 .

[6]  Agnès Roby-Brami,et al.  Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  M. Levin,et al.  Feedback and Cognition in Arm Motor Skill Reacquisition After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[8]  M. Levin,et al.  Kinematic features of arm and trunk movements in stroke patients and age-matched healthy controls during reaching in virtual and physical environments , 2009, 2009 Virtual Rehabilitation International Conference.

[9]  Ivan Toni,et al.  Neural Topography and Content of Movement Representations , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Roberta B. Shepherd,et al.  A Motor Learning Model for Stroke Rehabilitation , 1989 .

[11]  Mindy F. Levin,et al.  Sensorimotor deficits in patients with central nervous system lesions: Explanations based on the λ model of motor control , 2000 .

[12]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  A SWOT Analysis of the Field of Virtual Reality Rehabilitation and Therapy , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[13]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[14]  Sigal Berman,et al.  Arm path fragmentation and spatiotemporal features of hand reaching in healthy subjects and stroke patients , 2010, 2010 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology.

[15]  Patrice L Tamar Weiss,et al.  Training multitasking in a virtual supermarket: a novel intervention after stroke. , 2009, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[16]  K. Stubblefield,et al.  Hand Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Pilot Study of Assisted Finger Extension Training in a Virtual Environment , 2007, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[17]  Zijiang J. He,et al.  Distance determined by the angular declination below the horizon , 2001, Nature.

[18]  A. Rizzo,et al.  Virtual Reality and Neuropsychology: Upgrading the Current Tools , 2002, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[19]  R. Nudo,et al.  Neural Substrates for the Effects of Rehabilitative Training on Motor Recovery After Ischemic Infarct , 1996, Science.

[20]  P. Stratford,et al.  Measuring Physical Impairment and Disability With the Chedoke‐McMaster Stroke Assessment , 1993, Stroke.

[21]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Validity of Movement Pattern Kinematics as Measures of Arm Motor Impairment Poststroke , 2010, Stroke.

[22]  C. Patten,et al.  Reproducibility and Minimal Detectable Change of Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of Reaching Tasks in People With Hemiparesis After Stroke , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[23]  Mindy F Levin,et al.  Reaching in reality and virtual reality: a comparison of movement kinematics in healthy subjects and in adults with hemiparesis , 2004, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[24]  Patrice L Tamar Weiss,et al.  Virtual reality as means to improve physical fitness of individuals at a severe level of intellectual and developmental disability. , 2010, Research in developmental disabilities.

[25]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  Distance Perception in Immersive Virtual Environments, Revisited , 2006, IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR 2006).

[26]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  A SWOT Analysis of the Field of VR Rehabilitation and Therapy , 2004 .

[27]  L. S. Mark,et al.  Scaling affordances for human reach actions. , 2004, Human movement science.

[28]  R. Gregory Perceptions as hypotheses. , 1980, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[29]  Marco Santello,et al.  Compensatory motor control after stroke: an alternative joint strategy for object-dependent shaping of hand posture. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  E. H. Nichols,et al.  Virtual Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2013 .

[31]  P. Weiss,et al.  Intervention using the VMall for improving motor and functional ability of the upper extremity in post stroke participants. , 2009, European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine.

[32]  Patrice L. Weiss,et al.  Reaching within Video-Capture Virtual Reality: Using Virtual Reality as a Motor Control Paradigm , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  A. Hannan,et al.  Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[34]  Zhi Li,et al.  Controlled interaction: Strategies for using virtual reality to study perception , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[35]  Sandeep K Subramanian,et al.  Kinematics of pointing movements made in a virtual versus a physical 3-dimensional environment in healthy and stroke subjects. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[36]  R Gregory,et al.  Brainy mind , 1998, BMJ.

[37]  Eliane C Magdalon,et al.  Comparison of grasping movements made by healthy subjects in a 3-dimensional immersive virtual versus physical environment. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[38]  J. Kleim,et al.  Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. , 2008, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[39]  Mark Hallett,et al.  Cortical reorganization and associated functional motor recovery after virtual reality in patients with chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind preliminary study. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[40]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances , 1995 .

[41]  Geoffrey P. Bingham,et al.  Ontological issues in distance perception: Cue use under full cue conditions cannot be inferred from use under controlled conditions , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  S. G. Nelson,et al.  Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. , 1983, Physical therapy.

[43]  S. Dunnett,et al.  The influence of environment and experience on neural grafts , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  K. Sunnerhagen,et al.  Assessment and Training in a 3-Dimensional Virtual Environment With Haptics: A Report on 5 Cases of Motor Rehabilitation in the Chronic Stage After Stroke , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[45]  M. Thaut,et al.  The effects of constraint-induced therapy on kinematic outcomes and compensatory movement patterns: an exploratory study. , 2009, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[46]  Patrice L Tamar Weiss,et al.  Video-capture virtual reality system for patients with paraplegic spinal cord injury. , 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[47]  A. Fugl-Meyer,et al.  The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[48]  V. Mathiowetz,et al.  Adult norms for the Box and Block Test of manual dexterity. , 1985, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.