Multi-Scale Merge-Split Markov Chain Monte Carlo for Redistricting

We develop a Multi-Scale Merge-Split Markov chain on redistricting plans. The chain is designed to be usable as the proposal in a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm. Sampling the space of plans amounts to dividing a graph into a partition with a specified number of elements which each correspond to a different district. The districts satisfy a collection of hard constraints and the measure may be weighted with regard to a number of other criteria. The multi-scale algorithm is similar to our previously developed Merge-Split proposal, however, this algorithm provides improved scaling properties and may also be used to preserve nested communities of interest such as counties and precincts. Both works use a proposal which extends the ReCom algorithm which leveraged spanning trees merge and split districts. In this work we extend the state space so that each district is defined by a hierarchy of trees. In this sense, the proposal step in both algorithms can be seen as a "Forest ReCom." We also expand the state space to include edges that link specified districts, which further improves the computational efficiency of our algorithm. The collection of plans sampled by the MCMC algorithm can serve as a baseline against which a particular plan of interest is compared. If a given plan has different racial or partisan qualities than what is typical of the collection of plans, the given plan may have been gerrymandered and is labeled as an outlier.

[1]  Jonathan Rodden,et al.  Unintentional Gerrymandering: Political Geography and Electoral Bias in Legislatures , 2013 .

[2]  G. Nemhauser,et al.  An Optimization Based Heuristic for Political Districting , 1998 .

[3]  J. Mattingly,et al.  Redistricting and the Will of the People , 2014, 1410.8796.

[4]  Wesley Pegden,et al.  Separating Effect From Significance in Markov Chain Tests , 2019 .

[5]  Justin Solomon,et al.  Recombination: A family of Markov chains for redistricting , 2019, ArXiv.

[6]  Jonathan C. Mattingly,et al.  Redistricting: Drawing the Line , 2017, 1704.03360.

[7]  Jonathan Rodden,et al.  Cutting Through the Thicket : Redistricting Simulations and the Detection of Partisan Gerrymanders , 2015 .

[8]  C. Cirincione,et al.  Assessing South Carolina's 1990s congressional districting , 2000 .

[9]  David Miller,et al.  Impartial Redistricting: A Markov Chain Approach , 2015, ArXiv.

[10]  Justin Solomon,et al.  Complexity and Geometry of Sampling Connected Graph Partitions , 2019, ArXiv.

[11]  Jonathan C. Mattingly,et al.  Optimal Legislative County Clustering in North Carolina , 2019, Statistics and Public Policy.

[12]  ChenJowei,et al.  Cutting Through the Thicket: Redistricting Simulations and the Detection of Partisan Gerrymanders , 2015 .

[13]  Alfred V. Aho,et al.  The Design and Analysis of Computer Algorithms , 1974 .

[14]  A. Frieze,et al.  Assessing significance in a Markov chain without mixing , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Kosuke Imai,et al.  A New Automated Redistricting Simulator Using Markov Chain , 2014 .

[16]  Daryl R. DeFord,et al.  Redistricting Reform in Virginia: Districting Criteria in Context , 2019 .

[17]  M. D. Wilkinson,et al.  Management science , 1989, British Dental Journal.

[18]  W. Macmillan,et al.  Redistricting in a GIS environment: An optimisation algorithm using switching-points , 2001, J. Geogr. Syst..

[19]  Jonathan C. Mattingly,et al.  Evaluating Partisan Gerrymandering in Wisconsin , 2017, 1709.01596.

[20]  Shaowen Wang,et al.  PEAR: a massively parallel evolutionary computation approach for political redistricting optimization and analysis , 2016, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[21]  Jonathan C. Mattingly,et al.  A Merge-Split Proposal for Reversible Monte Carlo Markov Chain Sampling of Redistricting Plans , 2019, ArXiv.

[22]  Claude Lefort,et al.  Reversibility , 1985, Telos.

[23]  Jonathan C. Mattingly,et al.  Quantifying Gerrymandering in North Carolina , 2018, Statistics and Public Policy.

[24]  Moon Duchin,et al.  Outlier analysis for Pennsylvania congressional redistricting , 2018 .

[25]  Brendan D. McKay,et al.  The average number of spanning trees in sparse graphs with given degrees , 2016, Eur. J. Comb..

[26]  D. Hand,et al.  Statistics and Public Policy , 2020, From GDP to Sustainable Wellbeing.

[27]  Comparison of Districting Plans for the Virginia House of Delegates , 2018 .