Comparison of Surface Detail Reproduction of AlginateImpression Material and Type III Dental Stone

The compatibility of current alginate impression materials and dental stone is not completely understood. The purpose of the present study was to determine compatibility of commercially available alginate impression materials dental stones. A stainless steel die certified according to ISO specification No.1563 was used to make specimens for evaluation of surface detail. The mixed alginate impression was poured into a ring mold, and the test block was pressed down onto the material, and then removed after the material is set. The dental stones were mixed according to manufacturer’s instructions. The mixed dental stone was added to the impression in small increments. The casts were allowed to set for 1 hour at ambient room temperature of 20°C +2°C and 50% +10% relative humidity. The casts were examined under low angle light at X 10 magnification with a stereo zoom microscope (Motic MLC-150C Microscope Cold Light Source) for the entirety of the 0.05-mm-wide line. Among the fifteen combination we found that Neocolloid and Elite model found the best at significance level (p = 0.05). Hydrogum 5 and Elite rock shows the 2nd best combination and Hydrogum 5 and Elite model shows the third best combination. The results of this study should be used as a guide in determining compatible impression materials and dental stone.

[1]  H. Kim,et al.  Characterization of an anti-foaming and fast-setting gypsum for dental stone. , 2019, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  Debby Saputera,et al.  COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF TYPE III GYPSUM MIXED WITH WATER OF DIFFERENT WATER HARDNESS LEVEL (Research report) , 2019 .

[3]  W. Chee,et al.  Effects of setting under air pressure on the number of surface pores and irregularities of dental investment materials. , 2014, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  S. E. Ozkir,et al.  The influence of different mixing methods on the dimensional stability and surface detail reproduction of two different brands of irreversible hydrocolloids , 2014 .

[5]  P. Benson The Effect of Equilibrating Mounted Dental Stone Casts in Maximum Intercuspation on the Occlusal Harmony of an Indirect Restoration , 2013 .

[6]  M. Wevers,et al.  The influence of mixing methods and disinfectant on the physical properties of alginate impression materials. , 2013, European journal of orthodontics.

[7]  P. Buschang,et al.  The effect of equilibrating mounted dental stone casts on the occlusal harmony of cast metal complete crowns. , 2010, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[8]  E. Knox,et al.  Influence of surface hardener on gypsum abrasion resistance and water sorption. , 2003, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[9]  J. Paquette,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of an epoxy resin die material using two setting methods. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[10]  X. Lepe,et al.  Fracture strength of type IV and type V die stone as a function of time. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[11]  J H Bailey,et al.  Dimensional accuracy of improved dental stone and epoxy resin die materials. Part II: Complete arch form. , 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[12]  E. Combe,et al.  Properties of gypsum with the addition of gum arabic and calcium hydroxide. , 1996, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[13]  G Derrien,et al.  Comparison of transverse strength and dimensional variations between die stone, die epoxy resin, and die polyurethane resin. , 1995, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  C. P. Fernandes,et al.  Accuracy, detail reproduction, and hardness of gypsum casts produced from silicone impressions treated with glow discharge. , 1993, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[15]  N. V. Barrett,et al.  Compatibility of agar hydrocolloid duplicating materials with dental stones. , 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[16]  E. O. Williams,et al.  Compatibility of reversible hydrocolloid duplicating materials and dental stones. , 1984, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[17]  J I Nicholls,et al.  A study of distortion and surface hardness of improved artificial stone casts. , 1976, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[18]  K D Rudd,et al.  Compatibility of alginate impression materials and dental stones. , 1971, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[19]  W. Eames,et al.  Compatibility of gypsum products with hydrocolloid impression materials. , 1978, Operative dentistry.