Modulation frequency and orientation tuning of second-order texture mechanisms.

Modulation frequency and orientation tuning of second-order mechanisms underlying the detection of modulation in local spatial-frequency information are assessed by using an oblique-masking paradigm. Stimuli were Gabor-filtered noise patterns in which the local carrier spatial frequency was modulated about an average value of 4.7 cycles per degree (cpd) according to sinusoidal function. Thresholds were determined for spatial-frequency modulated test patterns (0.2 and 0.8 cpd) with fixed vertical carrier and modulation orientations presented alone and in the presence of spatiotemporally superimposed masks. Mask modulation frequency (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.8, or 1.6 cpd), modulation orientation (0 degree, 45 degrees, or 90 degrees relative to vertical), and carrier orientation (18.5 degrees or 90 degrees relative to vertical) were manipulated independently while the mask modulation amplitude remained fixed at 0.25. Manipulating the modulation frequency of the mask revealed some modulation frequency specificity, particularly at lower test modulation frequencies. Spatial-frequency modulated masks produced threshold elevations regardless of the local carrier orientation. However, there was no evidence of threshold elevation when the mask modulation orientation was orthogonal to that of the test pattern. These results suggest a second-order texture mechanism that is tuned to both modulation frequency and modulation orientation but is not selective in terms of the orientation of first-order inputs.

[1]  F. Campbell,et al.  Spatial-frequency discrimination in human vision. , 1970, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[2]  J. Koenderink,et al.  Detectability of amplitude- and frequency-modulation of suprathreshold sine-wave gratings , 1982, Vision Research.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Independence of orientation and size in spatial discriminations. , 1983, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[4]  Terry Caelli,et al.  Discrimination thresholds in the two-dimensional spatial frequency domain , 1983, Vision Research.

[5]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial frequency tuning of orientation selective units estimated by oblique masking , 1983, Vision Research.

[6]  J. Cutting,et al.  Three gradients and the perception of flat and curved surfaces. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[7]  H. Wilson,et al.  Orientation bandwidths of spatial mechanisms measured by masking. , 1984, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[8]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The sensitivity of the peripheral visual system to amplitude-modulation and frequency-modulation of sine-wave patterns , 1984, Vision Research.

[9]  A Bradley,et al.  Neurophysiological evaluation of the differential response model for orientation and spatial-frequency discrimination. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[10]  H. Wilson,et al.  Spatial-frequency discrimination in cats. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[11]  J. Todd,et al.  Perception of three-dimensional form from patterns of optical texture. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  J. Bergen,et al.  Computational Modeling of Visual Texture Segregation , 1991 .

[13]  J. Bergen,et al.  Texture segregation and orientation gradient , 1991, Vision Research.

[14]  H. Wilson,et al.  A two-process analysis of pattern masking , 1994, Vision Research.

[15]  L. Finkel,et al.  Characterization of the spatial-frequency spectrum in the perception of shape from texture. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[16]  D. Sheinberg,et al.  Shape from texture: ideal observers and human psychophysics , 1996 .