The importance of water‐retaining features for biodiversity on artificial intertidal coastal defence structures

Aim Artificial coastal defence structures are proliferating in response to rising and stormier seas. These structures provide habitat for many species but generally support lower biodiversity than natural habitats. This is primarily due to the absence of environmental heterogeneity and water-retaining features on artificial structures. We compared the epibiotic communities associated with artificial coastal defence structures and natural habitats to ask the following questions: (1) is species richness on emergent substrata greater in natural than artificial habitats and is the magnitude of this difference greater at mid than upper tidal levels; (2) is species richness greater in rock pools than emergent substrata and is the magnitude of this difference greater in artificial than natural habitats; and (3) in artificial habitats, is species richness in rock pools greater at mid than upper tidal levels? Location British Isles. Methods Standard non-destructive random sampling compared the effect of habitat type and tidal height on epibiota on natural rocky shores and artificial coastal defence structures. Results Natural emergent substrata supported greater species richness than artificial substrata. Species richness was greater at mid than upper tidal levels, particularly in artificial habitats. Rock pools supported greater species richness than emergent substrata, and this difference was more pronounced in artificial than natural habitats. Rock pools in artificial habitats supported greater species richness at mid than upper tidal levels. Main conclusions Artificial structures support lower biodiversity than natural habitats. This is primarily due to the lack of habitat heterogeneity in artificial habitats. Artificial structures can be modified to provide rock pools that promote biodiversity. The effect of rock pool creation will be more pronounced at mid than upper tidal levels. The challenge now is to establish at what tidal height the effect of pools becomes negligible and to determine the rock pool dimensions for optimum habitat enhancement.

[1]  Bregje K. van Wesenbeeck,et al.  How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection , 2011 .

[2]  Daniel Martin,et al.  Low crested coastal defence structures on the Catalan coast of the Mediterranean Sea: how they compare with natural rocky shores , 2007 .

[3]  I. Bárbara,et al.  Macroalgal communities of intertidal rock pools in the northwest coast of Portugal , 2006 .

[4]  Elizabeth Cook,et al.  Changing coasts: marine aliens and artificial structures , 2012 .

[5]  M. Chapman,et al.  Ecologically informed engineering reduces loss of intertidal biodiversity on artificial shorelines. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  James L. Fridley,et al.  Design principles for ecological engineering , 2001 .

[7]  Stephen J. Hawkins,et al.  Introductory comments - Global change in marine ecosystems: Patterns, processes and interactions with regional and local scale impacts , 2011 .

[8]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Assessment of a field incubation method estimating primary productivity in rockpool communities. , 2010 .

[9]  Benjamin Pister,et al.  Urban marine ecology in southern California: the ability of riprap structures to serve as rocky intertidal habitat , 2009 .

[10]  C. Johnson,et al.  Disturbance and organization of macroalgal assemblages in the Northwest Atlantic , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[11]  Louise B. Firth,et al.  Large-scale coexistence and small-scale segregation of key species on rocky shores , 2008, Hydrobiologia.

[12]  Shimrit Perkol-Finkel,et al.  Conservation challenges in urban seascapes: promoting the growth of threatened species on coastal infrastructures , 2012 .

[13]  Louise B. Firth,et al.  The influence of multiple environmental stressors on the limpet Cellana toreuma during the summer monsoon season in Hong Kong , 2009 .

[14]  J. Castilla,et al.  Rocky Intertidal Shores: Prognosis for the Future , 2008 .

[15]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Consumer effects on ecosystem functioning in rock pools: roles of species richness and composition , 2010 .

[16]  R. Francis,et al.  Urban river wall habitat and vegetation: observations from the River Thames through central London , 2009, Urban Ecosystems.

[17]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Intertidal assemblages on artificial and natural habitats in marinas on the north-west coast of Italy , 2004 .

[18]  A. Southward,et al.  The effects of wave-action on the distribution and numbers of the commoner plants and animals living on the Plymouth breakwater , 1954, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[19]  M. Chapman,et al.  Engineering novel habitats on urban infrastructure to increase intertidal biodiversity , 2009, Oecologia.

[20]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  The introduction of coastal infrastructure as a driver of change in marine environments , 2010 .

[21]  T. Crowe,et al.  Competition and habitat suitability: small-scale segregation underpins large-scale coexistence of key species on temperate rocky shores , 2009, Oecologia.

[22]  Grete E. Dinesen,et al.  Low-crested coastal defence structures as artificial habitats for marine life: Using ecological criteria in design , 2005 .

[23]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Evaluation of ecological engineering of "armoured" shorelines to improve their value as habitat. , 2011 .

[24]  D. Raffaelli,et al.  Intertidal Ecology , 1999, Springer Netherlands.

[25]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Ecological impact of coastal defence structures on sediment and mobile fauna: Evaluating and forecasting consequences of unavoidable modifications of native habitats , 2005 .

[26]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Enhancing stocks of the exploited limpet Patella candei d’Orbigny via modifications in coastal engineering , 2010 .

[27]  P. Schulze Engineering within ecological constraints , 1996 .

[28]  A. Metaxas,et al.  Community structure and organization of tidepools , 1993 .

[29]  Macroinvertebrate richness on flood defence walls of the tidal River Thames , 2012, Urban Ecosystems.

[30]  S. Hawkins,et al.  A study of the small-scale relationship between species number and area on a rocky shore , 1980 .

[31]  Tim M. Glasby,et al.  Do urban structures influence local abundance and diversity of subtidal epibiota? A case study from Sydney Harbour, Australia , 1999 .

[32]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Artificial marine structures facilitate the spread of a non‐indigenous green alga, Codium fragile ssp. tomentosoides, in the north Adriatic Sea , 2005 .

[33]  Shimrit Perkol-Finkel,et al.  Loss and Recovery Potential of Marine Habitats: An Experimental Study of Factors Maintaining Resilience in Subtidal Algal Forests at the Adriatic Sea , 2010, PloS one.

[34]  E. Berlow,et al.  The biology of rocky shores , 1997 .

[35]  Eunice Pinn,et al.  The assemblages of groynes in relation to substratum age, aspect and microhabitat , 2005 .

[36]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Rocky intertidal communities: past environmental changes, present status and predictions for the next 25 years , 2002, Environmental Conservation.

[37]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  An ecological perspective on the deployment and design of low-crested and other hard coastal defence structures , 2005 .

[38]  Lisandro Benedetti-Cecchi,et al.  Hard coastal-defence structures as habitats for native and exotic rocky-bottom species. , 2008, Marine environmental research.

[39]  A. Metaxas,et al.  Spatial and temporal variability of tidepool hyper-benthos on a rocky shore in Nova Scotia, Canada , 1994 .

[40]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Anthropogenic Disturbance Can Determine the Magnitude of Opportunistic Species Responses on Marine Urban Infrastructures , 2011, PloS one.

[41]  Louise B. Firth,et al.  Air temperature and winter mortality: Implications for the persistence of the invasive mussel, Perna viridis in the intertidal zone of the south-eastern United States , 2011 .

[42]  Richard C. Thompson,et al.  Predicting impacts of climate‐induced range expansion: an experimental framework and a test involving key grazers on temperate rocky shores , 2009 .

[43]  H. Burcharth,et al.  Environmental Design Guidelines for Low Crested Coastal Structures , 2007 .

[44]  Fabio Bulleri,et al.  Intertidal seawalls—new features of landscape in intertidal environments , 2003 .

[45]  T. Norton,et al.  Tide pools of Carrigathorna and Barloge Creek , 1979 .

[46]  P. I. Miller,et al.  Assessing wave energy effects on biodiversity: the Wave Hub experience , 2012, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[47]  A. J. Underwood,et al.  Experiments in Ecology: Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance , 1997 .