Negotiation in Technology Landscapes: An Actor-Issue Analysis

In large-scale negotiation problems and in assessments of complex and uncertain environments, it is vital to analyze the different stakeholders involved and to evaluate their positions in the negotiations. This paper extends a model, which merges previous multi-issue and actor-focused methods, based on power relationships between stakeholders and their ability to bargain in order to increase their utility. The model has already used for assessing a public WLAN landscape. The paper emphasizes the dynamic application of the model we developed for experimenting the negotiation evolution, shifting positions on some issues, and exchanging positions between actors. We also claim that such forecasting analyses of negotiation landscapes can be significantly improved using more appropriate visualization support. We propose new visualization tools for analyzing negotiation outcomes, representing negotiation landscapes, and applying what-if simulations, using passive influence, expected outcome and dissatisfaction, power distribution, proximity, and negotiation maps.

[1]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  Protocols for Electronic Negotiation Systems: Theoretical Foundations and Design Issues , 2004, EC-Web.

[2]  Frans Stokman,et al.  The Exchange Of Voting Positions: An Object-Oriented Model Of Policy Networks , 1994 .

[3]  H. Ansoff,et al.  Strategic Issue Management , 1980, Implanting Strategic Management.

[4]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Visualizing the stock market , 1999, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[5]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  A Theoretical Perspective of Negotiation Support Systems , 1992, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[6]  Tung Xuan Bui,et al.  Co-oP: A Group Decision Support System for Cooperative Multiple Criteria Group Decision Making , 1987 .

[7]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[8]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1986 .

[9]  Marjolein Achterkamp,et al.  Challenge Versus Exchange in Collective Decision Making: A Comparison of Two Simulation Models Based on Simulated Data , 2002, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[10]  Carlos Navarro,et al.  Exploring the WISP industry-Analysing strategies for Wireless Internet Service Providers , 2002 .

[11]  Frans Stokman,et al.  Conflict Measures in Cooperative Exchange Models of Collective Decision-making , 2003 .

[12]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration , 1980 .

[13]  T MarchSalvatore,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995 .

[14]  Lee W. McKnight,et al.  Wireless Internet access: 3G vs. WiFi? , 2003 .

[15]  R. Werle,et al.  Corporate Actor Networks in European Policy-Making: Harmonizing Telecommunications Policy , 1994 .

[16]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Multi-Issue Actor Analysis: Tools and Models for Assessing Technology Environments , 2004, J. Decis. Syst..

[17]  Robert Fildes Scenarios: The Art of Strategic Conversation , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[18]  Hock-Hai Teo,et al.  Computer-supported negotiations: an experimental study of bargaining in electronic commerce , 2000, ICIS.

[19]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  Spatialization Methods: A Cartographic Research Agenda for Non-geographic Information Visualization , 2003 .

[20]  Yves Pigneur,et al.  Decision and visualization for negotiation , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[21]  Robert L. Harris,et al.  Information Graphics: A Comprehensive Illustrated Reference , 1996 .

[22]  Bruce Bueno de Mesquita,et al.  European Community Decision Making : Models, Applications, And Comparisons , 1994 .

[23]  Robert C. Nickerson,et al.  Issues in Mobile E-Commerce , 2002, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Robert D. Wilson Information graphics: A comprehensive illustrated reference , 1998 .

[25]  Thomas A. Rietz,et al.  Information Systems Frontiers 5:1, 79–93, 2003 C ○ 2003 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Manufactured in The Netherlands. Prediction Markets as Decision Support Systems , 2022 .

[26]  Ganesh S. Oak Information Visualization Introduction , 2022 .

[27]  Michel Godet,et al.  Manuel de prospective stratégique , 2004 .

[28]  P. Fayers,et al.  The Visual Display of Quantitative Information , 1990 .

[29]  N. Quinn,et al.  A forced directed component placement procedure for printed circuit boards , 1979 .

[30]  Tera Allas,et al.  New Tools for Negotiators , 2001 .

[31]  Fabrice Roubelat,et al.  Structural analysis with the MICMAC method & Actor''s strategy with MACTOR method , 1999 .

[32]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Reversing the Perspective on the Applications of Decision Analysis (Comment on Keefer et al. 2004) , 2004 .

[33]  Yufei Yuan,et al.  A Business Model for e-Negotiation in Electronic Commerce , 2004 .

[34]  Arvind Rangaswamy,et al.  COMPUTER-MEDIATED NEGOTIATIONS: REVIEW AND RESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES , 2000 .

[35]  Jim R. Oliver A Machine-Learning Approach to Automated Negotiation and Prospects for Electronic Commerce , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[36]  David P. Tegarden,et al.  Business Information Visualization , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[38]  BenbasatIzak,et al.  A theoretical perspective of negotiation support systems , 1992 .

[39]  Katarina Stanoevska-Slabeva,et al.  Exploring the WISP Industry - Swiss Case Study , 2003, Bled eConference.

[40]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Ordered and quantum treemaps: Making effective use of 2D space to display hierarchies , 2002, TOGS.

[41]  W. Dill Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy , 1958 .

[42]  Salvatore T. March,et al.  Design and natural science research on information technology , 1995, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Umeshwar Dayal,et al.  Visual Data Mining for Business Intelligence Applications , 2000, Web-Age Information Management.

[44]  Raimo P. Hämäläinen,et al.  Decisionarium ‐ aiding decisions, negotiating and collecting opinions on the web , 2005 .

[45]  H. Raiffa,et al.  Negotiation Analysis: The Science and Art of Collaborative Decision Making , 2003 .

[46]  Peter Neijens,et al.  Multiparty Negotiation Support: The Role of Visualization’s Influence on the Development of Shared Mental Models , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Ronald K. Mitchell,et al.  Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts , 1997 .

[48]  Lutz E. Schlange Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation , 1997 .

[49]  Murray Turoff,et al.  The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications , 1976 .

[50]  Gregory E. Kersten,et al.  WWW-based negotiation support: design, implementation, and use , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[51]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Multicriteria Methods for Technology Foresight , 2003 .