Exploring user participation approaches in public e-service development

It has been argued that user participation is important when public authorities develop e-services. At the same time there is limited research on the usefulness of existing user participation appro ...

[1]  Yuquan Shi,et al.  The accessibility of Chinese local government Web sites: An exploratory study , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Gerhard Schmidt,et al.  Out of Scandinavia: Alternative Approaches to Software Design and System Development , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[3]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  ETHICS, Morality and Critique: An Essay on Enid Mumford¡¯s Socio-Technical Approach , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  HCI Research: Future Challenges and Directions , 2010 .

[5]  João Paulo Costa,et al.  Incorporating citizens' views in local policy decision making processes , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Michael Frese,et al.  Don't underestimate the problems of user centredness in software development projectsthere are many! , 1996, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[7]  K. Axelsson,et al.  Exploring the importance of citizen participation and involvement in e‐government projects: Practice, incentives, and organization , 2010 .

[8]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  The Importance of Context in Information System Design: An Assessment of Participatory Design , 1999, Requirements Engineering.

[9]  M. Kyng,et al.  Computers and Democracy: A Scandinavian Challenge , 1987 .

[10]  Tom Dayton,et al.  Participatory Practices in the Software Lifecycle , 1997 .

[11]  Gabriella Spinelli,et al.  User exclusion and fragmented requirements capture in publicly‐funded IS projects , 2009 .

[12]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Towards e‐government transformation: conceptualising “citizen engagement”: A research note , 2007 .

[13]  Eric S. K. Yu,et al.  Modeling organizations for information systems requirements engineering , 1993, [1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

[14]  Jonathan Lazar,et al.  Accessibility of U.S. federal government home pages: Section 508 compliance and site accessibility statements , 2011, Gov. Inf. Q..

[15]  Stephen Shaoyi Liao,et al.  Exploring Alternatives during Requirements Analysis , 2001, IEEE Softw..

[16]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Review: Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies , 1995 .

[17]  Keith Duncan,et al.  Cognitive Engineering , 2017, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[18]  Ann Lantz,et al.  Developing e-services in a government authority : Different views on design in procurement and system development , 2006 .

[19]  Helle Zinner Henriksen,et al.  The Diffusion of e-Services in Danish Municipalities , 2004, EGOV.

[20]  Tor Guimaraes,et al.  Successful Strategies for User Participation in Systems Development , 1997, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[22]  Juhani Iivari,et al.  Varieties of user‐centredness: an analysis of four systems development methods , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[23]  Sari Kujala,et al.  User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[24]  Peter Johnson,et al.  Costs and Benefits of User Involvement in Design: Practitioners' Views , 1996, BCS HCI.

[25]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Citizen Participation and Involvement in eGovernment Projects: An Emergent Framework , 2008, EGOV.

[26]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Systems Development Method Rationale: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis , 2003, ICEIS.

[27]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[28]  Marjo Kauppinen,et al.  Identifying and selecting users for user-centered design , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[29]  Shirley Gregor,et al.  The Anatomy of a Design Theory , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Mark John Taylor,et al.  End‐user computing and information systems methodologies , 1998, Inf. Syst. J..

[31]  Mikael Lind,et al.  Acting Out the Swedish e-Government Action Plan - mind and mend the gap , 2009 .

[32]  Kuno Schedler,et al.  Customer orientation in electronic government: Motives and effects , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[33]  Steven E. Miller.  From system design to democracy , 1993, CACM.

[34]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  User Participation and Democracy: A Discussion of Scandinavian Research on System Development , 1995, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Graham C. Low,et al.  Exploring Individual User Satisfaction Within User-Led Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[36]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Creating Conditions for Participation: Conflicts and Resources in Systems Development , 1996, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[37]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Exploring agile values in method configuration , 2009, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[38]  Blake Ives,et al.  An empirical study of the impact of user involvement on system usage and information satisfaction , 1986, CACM.

[39]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Method engineering: engineering of information systems development methods and tools , 1996, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[40]  Liam J. Bannon,et al.  Exploring User-Centred Design in Practice: Some Caveats , 2009 .

[41]  Denise Silver,et al.  Joint Application Development , 1995 .

[42]  Michael J. Muller,et al.  Participatory design , 1993, CACM.

[43]  A. F. Harmsen,et al.  Situational Method Engineering , 1997 .

[44]  Sjaak Brinkkemper,et al.  Meta-Modelling Based Assembly Techniques for Situational Method Engineering , 1999, Inf. Syst..

[45]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  Assessing participative systems design: Some conclusions from an exploratory study , 1983, Inf. Manag..

[46]  David G. Hendry.  Public participation in proprietary software development through user roles and discourse , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[47]  Shan Ling Pan,et al.  Managing Stakeholder Interests in E-Government Implementation: Lessons Learned from a Singapore E-Government Project , 2007, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[48]  Jungwoo Lee,et al.  Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model , 2001, Gov. Inf. Q..

[49]  Ioannis A. Tsoukalas,et al.  Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[50]  M. Zairi,et al.  Critical Success Factors of E-Government: A Proposed Model for E-Government Implementation , 2006, 2006 Innovations in Information Technology.

[51]  Gino Verleye,et al.  User-centered E-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[53]  Leela Damodaran,et al.  Citizen Participation and engagement in the Design of e-Government Services: The Missing Link in Effective ICT Design and Delivery , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[54]  Susan P. Williams,et al.  E-government policy and practice: A theoretical and empirical exploration of public e-procurement , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  Howie Goodell.  End-user computing , 1997, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[56]  Tone Bratteteig,et al.  The memoirs of two survivors: or the evaluation of a computer system for cooperative work , 1988, CSCW '88.

[57]  Rob Kling,et al.  The organizational context of user-centered software designs* , 1977 .

[58]  Pär J. Ågerfalk,et al.  Methods as Action Knowledge: Exploring the Concept of Method Rationale in Method Construction, Tailoring and Use , 2005, EMMSAD.

[59]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Key principles for user-centred systems design , 2003, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[60]  Clayton Lewis,et al.  Designing for usability—key principles and what designers think , 1983, CHI '83.

[61]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[62]  Enid Mumford,et al.  The ETHICS approach , 1993, CACM.

[63]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Steps toward a cognitive engineering: Design rules based on analyses of human error , 1982, CHI '82.

[64]  Panagiotis Georgiadis,et al.  Integrating e-government public transactional services into public authority workflows , 2004, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[65]  Andy Smith,et al.  Prototype evaluation and redesign: structuring the design space through contextual techniques , 2002, Interact. Comput..

[66]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Participation in Development and Implementation - Updating An Old, Tired Concept for Today's IS Contexts , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[67]  Andrew Clement,et al.  Computing at work: empowering action by “low-level users” , 1994, CACM.

[68]  Angèle L. M. Cavaye,et al.  User participation in system development revisited , 1995, Inf. Manag..

[69]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Developing public e-services for several stakeholders - A multifaceted view of the needs for an e-service , 2009, ECIS.

[70]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  ACRE: selecting methods for requirements acquisition , 1996, Softw. Eng. J..

[71]  Peter van den Besselaar,et al.  From small scale to large scale user participation: a case study of participatory design in e-government systems , 2004, PDC 04.

[72]  Erran Carmel,et al.  PD and joint application design: a transatlantic comparison , 1993, CACM.

[73]  Ken Friedman,et al.  Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods , 2003 .

[74]  Rudy Hirschheim,et al.  User Experience with and Assessment of Participative Systems Design , 1985, MIS Q..

[75]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  An analysis of the e-service literature: towards a research agenda , 2006, Internet Res..

[76]  Finn Kensing,et al.  Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns , 2004, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[77]  Karin Axelsson,et al.  Talking to, not about, Entrepreneurs - Experiences of Public e-service Development in a Business Start Up Case , 2008 .

[78]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Understanding and Developing User Involvement at a Public Authority , 2006 .

[79]  John Krogstie,et al.  User involvement in e-government development projects , 2004, NordiCHI '04.