Rapidly Locating and Characterizing Pollutant Releases in Buildings

Abstract Releases of airborne contaminants in or near a building can lead to significant human exposures unless prompt response measures are taken. However, possible responses can include conflicting strategies, such as shutting the ventilation system off versus running it in a purge mode or having occupants evacuate versus sheltering in place. The proper choice depends in part on knowing the source locations, the amounts released, and the likely future dispersion routes of the pollutants. We present an approach that estimates this information in real time. It applies Bayesian statistics to interpret measurements of airborne pollutant concentrations from multiple sensors placed in the building and computes best estimates and uncertainties of the release conditions. The algorithm is fast, capable of continuously updating the estimates as measurements stream in from sensors. We demonstrate the approach using a hypothetical pollutant release in a five-room building. Unknowns to the interpretation algorithm include location, duration, and strength of the source, and some building and weather conditions. Two sensor sampling plans and three levels of data quality are examined. Data interpretation in all examples is rapid; however, locating and characterizing the source with high probability depends on the amount and quality of data and the sampling plan.

[1]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Risk methodology for geologic disposal of radioactive waste: small sample sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, with an application to risk assessment , 1980 .

[2]  David T. Grimsrud,et al.  Temperature- and wind-induced air flow patterns in a staircase. Computer modelling and experimental verification , 1985 .

[3]  J S Evans,et al.  Evaluating the benefits of uncertainty reduction in environmental health risk management. , 1987, JAPCA.

[4]  Max Henrion,et al.  Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis , 1990 .

[5]  Helmut E. Feustel.  Measurements of air permability in multizone buildings , 1990 .

[6]  David W. Dilks,et al.  Development of Bayesian Monte Carlo techniques for water quality model uncertainty , 1992 .

[7]  A C Taylor,et al.  The value of animal test information in environmental control decisions. , 1993, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Updating Uncertainty in an Integrated Risk Assessment: Conceptual Framework and Methods , 1995 .

[9]  R. German.  Sintering theory and practice , 1996 .

[10]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  A Comprehensive Validation of Two Airflow Models — COMIS and CONTAM , 1996 .

[11]  M J Small,et al.  Risk-based environmental remediation: Bayesian Monte Carlo analysis and the expected value of sample information. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[12]  Mitchell J. Small,et al.  Bayesian Environmental Policy Decisions: Two Case Studies , 1996 .

[13]  Clifford Federspiel,et al.  Estimating the inputs of gas transport processes in buildings , 1997, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[14]  Pinsky Pf,et al.  A model to evaluate past exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. , 1998 .

[15]  Evaluation of the COMIS Model by Comparing Simulation and Measurement of Airflow and Pollutant Concentration , 1998 .

[16]  P. Pinsky,et al.  A model to evaluate past exposure to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. , 1998, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[17]  Helmut E. Feustel.  COMIS—an international multizone air-flow and contaminant transport model , 1999 .

[18]  M. Sohn,et al.  Reducing uncertainty in site characterization using Bayes Monte Carlo methods. , 2000 .

[19]  Mario Innocenti,et al.  Experimental application of extended Kalman filtering for sensor validation , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..