Progressively interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization method using generalized polynomial value functions

This paper advances and evaluates a recently proposed progressively interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithm. The algorithm uses preference information from the decision maker during the intermediate generations of the EMO and produces the most preferred solution on the Pareto-optimal front. The progress towards the Pareto-optimal front is made by approximating decision maker's value function. In this paper, a generalized polynomial value function has been proposed and the procedure to fit the value function to the decision maker's preference information has been described. The generality of the procedure of fitting a value function to the decision maker's preferences has been shown by using other existing value functions from the literature. The proposed generic polynomial value function has been incorporated in the PI-EMO-VF algorithm to efficiently approximate the decision maker's value function. The paper then evaluates the performance of the PI-EMO-VF algorithm on three and five objective test problems with constraints. It also evaluates the efficacy of the procedure in producing the most preferred solution when the decision maker is unable to provide perfect information, i.e., the decision maker finds certain pairs of solutions in the objective space to be incomparable. Results have been presented for three and five objective constrained test problems using the procedure.

[1]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Interactive Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms , 2008, Multiobjective Optimization.

[2]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization for quasi-concave preference functions , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Method Based on Progressively Approximated Value Functions , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[4]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  A Progressive Algorithm for Modeling and Solving Multiple-Criteria Decision Problems , 1986, Oper. Res..

[5]  Jyrki Wallenius,et al.  Further Developments and Tests of a Progressive Algorithm for Multiple Criteria Decision Making , 1993, Oper. Res..

[6]  A. Jaszkiewicz,et al.  Interactive multiobjective optimization with the Pareto memetic algorithm , 2007 .

[7]  Andrzej P. Wierzbicki,et al.  The Use of Reference Objectives in Multiobjective Optimization , 1979 .

[8]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[9]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Simulated Binary Crossover for Continuous Search Space , 1995, Complex Syst..

[10]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  An Interactive Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization Method Based on Polyhedral Cones , 2010, LION.

[11]  Jürgen Branke,et al.  Interactive Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization Using Robust Ordinal Regression , 2009, EMO.

[12]  Murat Köksalan,et al.  An Interactive Evolutionary Metaheuristic for Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[13]  David W. Corne,et al.  Quantifying the Effects of Objective Space Dimension in Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2007, EMO.

[14]  Marco Laumanns,et al.  Scalable Test Problems for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization , 2005, Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization.