BACKGROUND
Glycemic variability is currently under scrutiny as a possible predictor of the complications of diabetes. The manual process for estimating a now classical measure of glycemic variability, the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE), is both tedious and prone to error, and there is a special need for an automated method to calculate the MAGE from continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data.
METHODS
An automated algorithm for identifying the peaks and nadirs corresponding to the glycemic excursions required for the MAGE calculation has been developed. The algorithm takes a column of timed glucose measurements and generates a plot joining the peaks and nadirs required for estimating the MAGE. It returns estimates of the MAGE for both upward and downward excursions, together with several other indices of glycemic variability.
RESULTS
Details of the application of the algorithm to CGM data collected over a 48-h period are provided, together with graphical illustrations of the intermediate stages in identifying the peaks and nadirs required for the MAGE. Application of the algorithm to 104 CGM datasets (92 from children with diabetes and 12 from controls) generated plots that, on visual inspection, were all found to have identified the peaks, nadirs, and excursions correctly.
CONCLUSIONS
The proposed algorithm eliminates the tedium and/or errors of manually identifying and measuring countable excursions in CGM data in order to estimate the MAGE. It can also be used to calculate the MAGE from "sparse" blood glucose measurements, such as those collected in home blood glucose monitoring.
[1]
David Rodbard,et al.
Interpretation of continuous glucose monitoring data: glycemic variability and quality of glycemic control.
,
2009,
Diabetes technology & therapeutics.
[2]
David Rodbard,et al.
New and improved methods to characterize glycemic variability using continuous glucose monitoring.
,
2009,
Diabetes technology & therapeutics.
[3]
W. F. Taylor,et al.
Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions, a Measure of Diabetic Instability
,
1970,
Diabetes.
[4]
Howard Zisser,et al.
Improved quality of glycemic control and reduced glycemic variability with use of continuous glucose monitoring.
,
2009,
Diabetes technology & therapeutics.
[5]
R. Rizza,et al.
Measurements of Glucose Control
,
1987,
Diabetes Care.
[6]
Jean-Paul Cristol,et al.
Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
,
2006,
JAMA.
[7]
P. Baghurst,et al.
Measuring glycaemic variation.
,
2010,
Current diabetes reviews.
[8]
F. Service,et al.
Characteristics of Glycemic Stability
,
1980,
Diabetes Care.
[9]
A. Rigby,et al.
Effect of Glucose Variability on the Long-Term Risk of Microvascular Complications in Type 1 Diabetes
,
2009,
Diabetes Care.