A quasi-experimental approach to determining success criteria for projects

Since the 1960's many authors accepted the triple constraints (time, cost, specification) as a standard measure of success and this still appears to be extremely important in evaluating the success of ICT projects. However, a project cannot always be seen as a complete success or a complete failure. Moreover, the parties involved may perceive the terms "success" or "failure" differently. The authors have set up a quasiexperiment (gaming) in order to determine the criteria used by the different parties involved to judge the success of an ICT project. The results of this quasiexperiment were analysed using both linear and nonlinear techniques (e.g. general linear models and probabilistic feature models for frequency data - PMD-models). This research indicates that the impact of the triple constraints on the judgment of success is rather small. Other criteria, as there are user happiness and financial or commercial success are far more important. Furthermore, parties who's involvement ceases after the handover tend to concentrate more on budget and satisfying the parties involved, while the other parties concentrate more on time, specifications and financial or commercial success, which is a long-term criterion.

[1]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Information Systems Implementation: Testing a Structural Model , 1990 .

[2]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[3]  Andrew Gelman,et al.  Bayesian Inference with Probability Matrix Decomposition Models , 2001 .

[4]  Henk Sol,et al.  Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , 1997, HICSS 2015.

[5]  I. Mechelen,et al.  Probability matrix decomposition models and main-effects generalized linear models for the analysis of replicated binary associations , 2002 .

[6]  I. Mechelen,et al.  A taxonomy of latent structure assumptions for probability matrix decomposition models , 2003 .

[7]  Leslie P. Willcocks Information management - the evaluation of information systems investments , 1994 .

[8]  J. Wright,et al.  Time and budget: the twin imperatives of a project sponsor , 1997 .

[9]  John Wateridge,et al.  IT projects: a basis for success , 1995 .

[10]  Walid Belassi,et al.  A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects , 1996 .

[11]  J. Pinto,et al.  Critical Success Factors in R&D Projects , 1989 .

[12]  Alan Fowler,et al.  Conflicting perceptions of success in an information systems project , 1999 .

[13]  William R. King,et al.  Project Management Handbook , 1983 .

[14]  John Frederick Wateridge,et al.  Delivering successful IS/IT projects : eight key elements from success criteria to review via appropriate management, methodologies and teams , 1996 .

[15]  John Wateridge,et al.  How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? , 1998 .

[16]  John Wateridge,et al.  Training for IS/IT project managers: A way forward , 1997 .

[17]  I. Mechelen,et al.  Probability matrix decomposition models , 1996 .

[18]  B. Hochstrasser,et al.  Controlling It Investment: Strategy and Management , 1992 .