Flow regime at ambient outlet pressure and its influence in comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography.

With method development in one-dimensional GC already being a tedious task, developing GC x GC methods is even more laborious. The majority of the present GC x GC applications are derived from previously optimised 1D-GC methods, from which especially the carrier gas flow settings are copied. However, in view of the high pressure inside the first-dimension column (high flow resistance of the narrow-bore second-dimension column), diffusion in the first column is much slower than in 1D-GC. Proper optimisation of the column combination and the carrier gas flow can considerably improve separations in GC x GC. To assist in the process of selecting column dimensions and flow rate optimization, we have developed a computer programme, based on Excel, that enables quick and simple calculation for all types of column combinations. The programme merely needs column dimensions and carrier gas type as input parameters and calculates all resolution and velocity parameters of the GC x GC separation by using flow rate and plate height equations. From the calculations a number of interesting conclusions can be drawn. As an example, the calculations clearly show that the majority of column combinations reported up till now have been operated at a far from optimal flow -- and, consequently, a far from optimal resolution. Probably even more important is the conclusion that the majority of column combinations used so far, i.e. those with 100 microm I.D. second-dimension columns, are not necessarily the best choice for GC x GC.

[1]  Peter J. Schoenmakers,et al.  Nomenclature and conventions in comprehensive multidimensional chromatography , 2003 .

[2]  J. Seeley,et al.  Theoretical study of incomplete sampling of the first dimension in comprehensive two-dimensional chromatography. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  R. Tijssen,et al.  Prediction of comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatographic separations: A theoretical and practical exercise , 1998 .

[4]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Simple, non-moving modulation interface for comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography. , 2001, Journal of chromatography. A.

[5]  C. Cramers,et al.  Fast Gas Chromatography using Vacuum Outlet Conditions , 2000 .

[6]  Adrian E. Scheidegger,et al.  The physics of flow through porous media , 1957 .

[7]  H. Poppe,et al.  The mass loadability of various stationary phases in gas chromatography , 1989 .

[8]  C. Cramers,et al.  TURBULENT FLOW IN CAPILLARY GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY , 1989 .

[9]  Ja Jacques Rijks,et al.  Increased speed of analysis in isothermal and temperature-programmed capillary gas chromatography by reduction of the column inner diameter , 1982 .

[10]  L. Ettre Viscosity of gases used as the mobile phase in gas chromatography , 1984 .

[11]  U. Brinkman,et al.  Optimization and characterization of comprehensive two‐dimensional gas chromatography with time‐of‐flight mass spectrometric detection (GC×GC–TOF MS) , 2002 .

[12]  Mohamed Adahchour,et al.  Comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection for the trace analysis of flavour compounds in food. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. A.

[13]  P. Marriott,et al.  Influence of chromatographic conditions on separation in comprehensive gas chromatography. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[14]  J. Foley,et al.  Effect of Sampling Rate on Resolution in Comprehensive Two-Dimensional Liquid Chromatography , 1998 .

[15]  J. Giddings Concepts and comparisons in multidimensional separation , 1987 .

[16]  P. Leclercq Optimum Performance of Capillary GC Columns as a Function of Column Diameter and Film Thickness under Various Operating Conditions: Part II: Computer Program Extensions for n-Alkane Solutes and Polydimethylsiloxane Phases') , 1992 .