Fault Tolerant Mechanism Design for General Task Allocation

We study a general task allocation problem, involving multiple agents that collaboratively accomplish tasks and where agents may fail to successfully complete the tasks assigned to them (known as execution uncertainty). The goal is to choose an allocation that maximises social welfare while taking their execution uncertainty into account (i.e., fault tolerant). To achieve this, we show that the post-execution verification (PEV)-based mechanism presented by Porter et al. (2008) is applicable if and only if agents' valuations are risk-neutral (i.e., the solution is almost universal). We then consider a more advanced setting where an agent's execution uncertainty is not completely predictable by the agent alone but aggregated from all agents' private opinions (known as trust). We show that PEV-based mechanism with trust is still applicable if and only if the trust aggregation is multilinear. Given this characterisation, we further demonstrate how this mechanism can be successfully applied in a real-world setting. Finally, we draw the parallels between our results and the literature of efficient mechanism design with general interdependent valuations.

[1]  Tilman Börgers,et al.  An introduction to the theory of mechanism design , 2015 .

[2]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Mechanism Design for Scheduling with Uncertain Execution Time , 2014, AAAI.

[3]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  An Implementation of the Contract Net Protocol Based on Marginal Cost Calculations , 1993, AAAI.

[4]  Ron Lavi,et al.  Algorithmic Mechanism Design , 2008, Encyclopedia of Algorithms.

[5]  L. Blume,et al.  The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd edition , 2008 .

[6]  Moshe Tennenholtz,et al.  Fault tolerant mechanism design , 2008, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Incentives in ridesharing with deficit control , 2014, AAMAS.

[8]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Algorithms and mechanisms for procuring services with uncertain durations using redundancy , 2011, Artif. Intell..

[9]  S. Basov,et al.  The Revelation Principle , 2016 .

[10]  E. Stacchetti,et al.  Multidimensional Mechanism Design for Auctions with Externalities , 1999 .

[11]  Theodore Groves,et al.  Incentives in Teams , 1973 .

[12]  Tim Roughgarden,et al.  Algorithmic Game Theory , 2007 .

[13]  Umang Bhaskar,et al.  Routing games , 2012 .

[14]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Trust-Based Mechanisms for Robust and Efficient Task Allocation in the Presence of Execution Uncertainty , 2009, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[15]  R. Belk You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online , 2014 .

[16]  Randy H. Katz,et al.  A view of cloud computing , 2010, CACM.

[17]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Computationally feasible VCG mechanisms , 2000, EC '00.

[18]  B. Moldovanu,et al.  Efficient Design with Interdependent Valuations , 2001 .

[19]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  A theory of auctions and competitive bidding , 1982 .

[20]  Yves Sprumont,et al.  Sharing the cost of a public good: An incentive-constrained axiomatic approach , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..