In vivo neurovascular response to focused photoactivation of Channelrhodopsin-2

&NA; The rapid growth in the use of optogenetics for neuroscience applications is largely driven by two important advantages: highly specific cellular targeting through genetic manipulations; and precise temporal control of neuronal activation via temporal modulation of the optical stimulation. The difference between the most commonly used stimulation modalities, namely diffused (i.e. synchronous) and focused (i.e. asynchronous) stimulation has not been described. Furthermore, full realization of optogenetics' potential is hindered by our incomplete understanding of the cellular and network level response to photoactivation. Here we address these gaps by examining the neuronal and cerebrovascular responses to focused and diffuse photostimulation of channelrhodopsin in the Thy1‐ChR2 mouse. We presented the responses of photoactivation via 470‐nm fiber optic illumination (diffuse) alongside 458‐nm raster‐scan (focused) stimulation of the barrel field. Local field potentials (LFP) assessment of intracerebral electrophysiology and two‐photon fluorescence microscopy measurements of red blood cell (RBC) speed (vRBC) in cortical penetrating vessels revealed ˜40% larger LFP responses (p = 0.05) and twice as large cerebrovascular responses (p = 0.002) under focused vs. diffuse photostimulation (focused: 1.64 ± 0.84 mV LFP amplitude and 75 ± 48% increase in vRBC; diffuse: 1.14 ± 0.75 mV LFP amplitude and 35 ± 23% increase in vRBC). Compared to diffuse photostimulation, focused photostimulation resulted in a ˜65% increase in the yield of cerebrovascular responses (73 ± 10% for focused and 42 ± 29% for diffuse photostimulation) and a doubling of the signal‐to‐noise ratio of the cerebrovascular response (20.9 ± 14.7 for focused and 10.4 ± 1.4 for diffuse photostimulation). These data reveal important advantages of focused optogenetic photoactivation, which can be easily integrated into single‐ or two‐photon fluorescence microscopy platforms, as a means of assessing neuronal excitability and cerebrovascular reactivity, thus paving the way for broader application of optogenetics in preclinical models of CNS diseases.

[1]  J. Sui,et al.  Optogenetic stimulation of mPFC pyramidal neurons as a conditioned stimulus supports associative learning in rats , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Olli Gröhn,et al.  Functional connectivity under six anesthesia protocols and the awake condition in rat brain , 2018, NeuroImage.

[3]  Gary Gilmour,et al.  Close temporal coupling of neuronal activity and tissue oxygen responses in rodent whisker barrel cortex , 2011, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Input-specific control of reward and aversion in the ventral tegmental area , 2012, Nature.

[5]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Relative changes of cerebral arterial and venous blood volumes during increased cerebral blood flow: Implications for BOLD fMRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Fluctuations and stimulus-induced changes in blood flow observed in individual capillaries in layers 2 through 4 of rat neocortex. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Optogenetic neuronal stimulation promotes functional recovery after stroke , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Michael R Bruchas,et al.  Effective Connectivity Measured Using Optogenetically Evoked Hemodynamic Signals Exhibits Topography Distinct from Resting State Functional Connectivity in the Mouse , 2017, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  T. Murphy,et al.  Automated light-based mapping of motor cortex by photoactivation of channelrhodopsin-2 transgenic mice , 2009, Nature Methods.

[10]  D. Attwell,et al.  The neural basis of functional brain imaging signals , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  M. Moskowitz,et al.  Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.

[12]  Tyson N. Kim,et al.  Line-Scanning Particle Image Velocimetry: An Optical Approach for Quantifying a Wide Range of Blood Flow Speeds in Live Animals , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  Jaime Grutzendler,et al.  Regional Blood Flow in the Normal and Ischemic Brain Is Controlled by Arteriolar Smooth Muscle Cell Contractility and Not by Capillary Pericytes , 2015, Neuron.

[14]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Direct 3D Analyses Reveal Barrel-Specific Vascular Distribution and Cross-Barrel Branching in the Mouse Barrel Cortex. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  Vishnu B. Sridhar,et al.  Cell type specificity of neurovascular coupling in cerebral cortex , 2016, eLife.

[16]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Color-tuned Channelrhodopsins for Multiwavelength Optogenetics , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[17]  J. Meijer,et al.  Optogenetic induction of cortical spreading depression in anesthetized and freely behaving mice , 2017, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[18]  David Kleinfeld,et al.  Penetrating arterioles are a bottleneck in the perfusion of neocortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  E. Vigmond,et al.  Electrical communication in branching arterial networks. , 2012, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[20]  M. Lauritzen.  Reading vascular changes in brain imaging: is dendritic calcium the key? , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[21]  Alan Carleton,et al.  Odor representations in the olfactory bulb evolve after the first breath and persist as an odor afterimage , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  C. Iadecola.  The Neurovascular Unit Coming of Age: A Journey through Neurovascular Coupling in Health and Disease , 2017, Neuron.

[23]  John G. Sled,et al.  Cerebral microvascular network geometry changes in response to functional stimulation , 2013, NeuroImage.

[24]  Timothy H. Murphy,et al.  Hemodynamic Responses Evoked by Neuronal Stimulation via Channelrhodopsin-2 Can Be Independent of Intracortical Glutamatergic Synaptic Transmission , 2012, PloS one.

[25]  Benjamin R. Arenkiel,et al.  In Vivo Light-Induced Activation of Neural Circuitry in Transgenic Mice Expressing Channelrhodopsin-2 , 2007, Neuron.

[26]  Stefan R. Pulver,et al.  Independent Optical Excitation of Distinct Neural Populations , 2014, Nature Methods.

[27]  M. Tanter,et al.  Light controls cerebral blood flow in naive animals , 2017, Nature Communications.

[28]  Bojana Stefanovic,et al.  Amyloid-β-dependent compromise of microvascular structure and function in a model of Alzheimer's disease. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  Karl Deisseroth,et al.  Integration of optogenetics with complementary methodologies in systems neuroscience , 2017, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Michael Z. Lin,et al.  Characterization of engineered channelrhodopsin variants with improved properties and kinetics. , 2009, Biophysical journal.

[31]  Mehdi Azimipour,et al.  Patterned Optogenetic Modulation of Neurovascular and Metabolic Signals , 2015, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[32]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Two-Photon Microscopy as a Tool to Study Blood Flow and Neurovascular Coupling in the Rodent Brain , 2013 .

[33]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2, a directly light-gated cation-selective membrane channel , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Neural and Hemodynamic Responses to Optogenetic and Sensory Stimulation in the Rat Somatosensory Cortex , 2015, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[35]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Relationship between neural, vascular, and BOLD signals in isoflurane-anesthetized rat somatosensory cortex. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  Tim C. Lei,et al.  Light Scattering Properties Vary across Different Regions of the Adult Mouse Brain , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  Timothy H Murphy,et al.  Optogenetic Stimulation of GABA Neurons can Decrease Local Neuronal Activity While Increasing Cortical Blood Flow , 2015, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[38]  Ernst Bamberg,et al.  Spectral characteristics of the photocycle of channelrhodopsin-2 and its implication for channel function. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Alice M Stamatakis,et al.  Distinct extended amygdala circuits for divergent motivational states , 2013, Nature.

[40]  K. Deisseroth,et al.  Millisecond-timescale, genetically targeted optical control of neural activity , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  D. Kleinfeld,et al.  Fluctuating and sensory-induced vasodynamics in rodent cortex extend arteriole capacity , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Yuting Deng,et al.  Two-way communication with neural networks in vivo using focused light , 2013, Nature Protocols.

[43]  T. Murphy,et al.  Optogenetic Analysis of Neuronal Excitability during Global Ischemia Reveals Selective Deficits in Sensory Processing following Reperfusion in Mouse Cortex , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Neural and hemodynamic responses elicited by forelimb- and photo-stimulation in channelrhodopsin-2 mice: insights into the hemodynamic point spread function. , 2014, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  Feng Zhang,et al.  Channelrhodopsin-2 and optical control of excitable cells , 2006, Nature Methods.

[46]  Jack A. Wells,et al.  fMRI response to blue light delivery in the naïve brain: Implications for combined optogenetic fMRI studies , 2013, NeuroImage.

[47]  T. L. Davis,et al.  Calibrated functional MRI: mapping the dynamics of oxidative metabolism. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[48]  R. Shapley,et al.  Spatial Spread of the Local Field Potential and its Laminar Variation in Visual Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  E. Bamberg,et al.  Light Activation of Channelrhodopsin-2 in Excitable Cells of Caenorhabditis elegans Triggers Rapid Behavioral Responses , 2005, Current Biology.

[50]  Raag D. Airan,et al.  Optogenetic interrogation of neural circuits: technology for probing mammalian brain structures , 2010, Nature Protocols.

[51]  Seong-Gi Kim,et al.  Optogenetic investigation of the variable neurovascular coupling along the interhemispheric circuits , 2018, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.