Regional myocardial perfusion imaging in predicting vessel-related outcome: interplay between the perfusion results and angiographic findings

[1]  M. Petretta,et al.  Comparing the Prognostic Value of Stress Myocardial Perfusion Imaging by Conventional and Cadmium-Zinc Telluride Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography through a Machine Learning Approach , 2021, Computational and mathematical methods in medicine.

[2]  P. Marzullo,et al.  Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease: the AMICO registry. , 2020, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[3]  H. Cai,et al.  Prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging with D-SPECT camera in patients with ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA) , 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[4]  D. Berman,et al.  CZT camera systems may provide better risk stratification for low-risk patients , 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[5]  M. Petretta,et al.  A machine learning-based approach to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging by conventional and cadmium-zinc telluride SPECT , 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  M. Petretta,et al.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve by CZT-SPECT: A head to head comparison with 82Rubidium PET imaging , 2020, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  M. Petretta,et al.  Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by 82Rb PET/CT in predicting lesion-related outcome , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  Yaiza Beatriz Molero-Díez,et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2019, Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology.

[9]  Wanda Acampa,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of diagnostic accuracy of stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and cadmium-zinc telluride single-photon emission computed tomography in women with suspected coronary artery disease , 2019, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  R. Cuocolo,et al.  Diagnostic performance of myocardial perfusion imaging with conventional and CZT single-photon emission computed tomography in detecting coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis , 2019, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). , 2018, European heart journal.

[12]  M. Salvatore,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of coronary artery calcium scanning, coronary computed tomographic angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with suspected coronary artery disease , 2018, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[13]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Automated SPECT analysis compared with expert visual scoring for the detection of FFR-defined coronary artery disease , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  Wanda Acampa,et al.  Combined evaluation of regional coronary artery calcium and myocardial perfusion by 82Rb PET/CT in the identification of obstructive coronary artery disease , 2018, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  R. Lima,et al.  Prognostic value of a faster, low-radiation myocardial perfusion SPECT protocol in a CZT camera , 2017, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[16]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Prognostic Value of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging with a Cadmium-Zinc-Telluride SPECT Camera in Patients Suspected of Having Coronary Artery Disease , 2017, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  Thais R Peclat,et al.  Comparison of the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using a CZT-SPECT camera with a conventional anger camera , 2017, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  P. Jüni,et al.  A Prospective Natural History Study of Coronary Atherosclerosis Using Fractional Flow Reserve. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Guido Germano,et al.  Quantitation of left ventricular ejection fraction reserve from early gated regadenoson stress Tc-99m high-efficiency SPECT , 2016, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[20]  R. Buechel,et al.  Low dose in nuclear cardiology: state of the art in the era of new cadmium-zinc-telluride cameras. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[21]  J. Ottervanger,et al.  Prognostic value of normal stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging: a comparison between conventional and CZT-based SPECT , 2016, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[22]  André Rogatko,et al.  Combined Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Perfusion and Coronary Artery Calcium Score by Hybrid 82Rb PET/CT Improves Detection of Coronary Artery Disease , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the Task Force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2013, European heart journal.

[24]  D. Berman,et al.  Quantitative analysis of perfusion studies: Strengths and pitfalls , 2012, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[25]  U. Siebert,et al.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  D. Berman,et al.  Automated quantification of myocardial perfusion SPECT using simplified normal limits , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.