Resource efficiency of multifunctional wood cascade chains using LCA and exergy analysis, exemplified by a case study for Germany

Abstract Driven by the scarcity of non-renewable resources and a growing environmental awareness in Germany, the demand for wood could likely exceed its sustainable supply within the next decades. In response to this development, cascading, i. e. the sequential use of one unit of material in material applications with energy generation as final step, is expected to enhance the resource efficiency of wood utilization. In this context, the objective of this paper is to determine the resource consumption and resource efficiency of wood cascading compared to the use of primary wood to provide the same multiple functions. To account for resource use and calculate the efficiency, exergy analysis was applied. The exergy of a material is the potential work that can be obtained from the material in the natural environment. By using Exergy Flow Analysis, key drivers of exergy dissipation and thus hotspots for improvement were identified. Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment was applied to determine resource use and the resource efficiency at a life cycle level. The results indicate that cascading leads to less resource consumption compared to the use of primary wood, indicated by higher resource efficiency (46% vs. 21%) at life cycle level. The main resource saving potential through cascading arises from avoiding primary production in forestry systems. In conclusion, cascading reduces the primary resource extraction and makes wood utilization highly efficient. Exergy analysis proved to be a viable method to study the resource use of multifunctional cascading systems, although showing some limitations with respect to land use accounting.

[1]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Quantifying the environmental impact of an integrated human/industrial-natural system using life cycle assessment; a case study on a forest and wood processing chain. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Leif Gustavsson,et al.  Energy and carbon balances of wood cascade chains , 2006 .

[3]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Stand density and growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.): evidence from long-term experimental plots , 2005, European Journal of Forest Research.

[4]  Thomas Schaubroeck,et al.  Including man-nature relationships in environmental sustainability assessment of forest-based production systems , 2014 .

[5]  Sebastian Rüter,et al.  Ökobilanz-Basisdaten für Bauprodukte aus Holz , 2012 .

[6]  Rene Cornelissen,et al.  The value of the exergetic life cycle assessment besides the LCA , 2002 .

[7]  J. M. Earles,et al.  Consequential life cycle assessment: a review , 2011 .

[8]  Mustafa Özilgen,et al.  Energy and exergy utilization, and carbon dioxide emission in vegetable oil production , 2011 .

[9]  Gregor Wernet,et al.  The ecoinvent database version 3 (part I): overview and methodology , 2016, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[10]  Robert U. Ayres,et al.  Accounting for Resources, 2 , 1999 .

[11]  Benedetto Rugani,et al.  Environmental impact assessment and monetary ecosystem service valuation of an ecosystem under different future environmental change and management scenarios; a case study of a Scots pine forest. , 2016, Journal of environmental management.

[12]  M. Swilling,et al.  Assessing global land use : balancing consumption with sustainable supply , 2014 .

[13]  Millenium Ecosystem Assessment.  Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis , 2005 .

[14]  J Dewulf,et al.  Exergy-based efficiency and renewability assessment of biofuel production. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  Markus A. Reuter,et al.  Quantifying the quality loss and resource efficiency of recycling by means of exergy analysis , 2007 .

[16]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  The efficiency of the manufacturing of chemical products through the overall industrial metabolism , 2010 .

[17]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Resource use analysis of Pangasius aquaculture in the Mekong Delta in Vietnam using Exergetic Life Cycle Assessment , 2013 .

[18]  Serenella Sala,et al.  Assessing resource depletion in LCA: a review of methods and methodological issues , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[19]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Utilization of recovered wood in cascades versus utilization of primary wood—a comparison with life cycle assessment using system expansion , 2014, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Toward a systematized framework for resource efficiency indicators , 2015 .

[22]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Inferred equations for predicting cumulative exergy extraction throughout cradle-to-gate life cycles of Pangasius feeds and intensive Pangasius grow-out farms in Vietnam , 2016 .

[23]  Peter J. Fraanje,et al.  Cascading of pine wood , 1997 .

[24]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Expanding exergy analysis to account for ecosystem products and services. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Jan Szargut,et al.  Exergy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes , 1988 .

[26]  Alfred Teischinger,et al.  Quantification of future availabilities of recovered wood from Austrian residential buildings , 2017 .

[27]  Stijn Bruers,et al.  Exergy: its potential and limitations in environmental science and technology. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Cumulative Overall Resource Efficiency Assessment (COREA) for comparing bio-based products with their fossil-derived counterparts , 2015 .

[29]  B. Elbersen,et al.  Cascading use: a systematic approach to biomass beyond the energy sector , 2013 .

[30]  Matthias Schumann,et al.  Environmental impacts of wood-based products under consideration of cascade utilization: A systematic literature review , 2018 .

[31]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Accounting for the occupation of the marine environment as a natural resource in life cycle assessment: An exergy based approach , 2014 .

[32]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA: A literature review , 2007 .

[33]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Assessment of Life Cycle Impacts on Ecosystem Services: Promise, Problems, and Prospects. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  D. Deselnicu,et al.  Towards a circular economy: A zero waste programme for Europe , 2014 .

[35]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Life Cycle Assessments for Wood Energy Services , 2016 .

[36]  H. Spiecker,et al.  Tree- and Stand-Level Thinning Effects on Growth of European Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) on a Northeast- and a Southwest-Facing Slope in Southwest Germany , 2015 .

[37]  Susan Selke,et al.  Critical aspects in the life cycle assessment (LCA) of bio-based materials – Reviewing methodologies and deriving recommendations , 2013 .

[38]  Ted Sirkin,et al.  The cascade chain: A theory and tool for achieving resource sustainability with applications for product design , 1994 .

[39]  Pilar Swart,et al.  Abiotic Resource Use , 2015 .

[40]  E. Sciubba,et al.  Extended exergy accounting applied to biodiesel production , 2010 .

[41]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Accounting for land use in life cycle assessment: The value of NPP as a proxy indicator to assess land use impacts on ecosystems. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[42]  Mark A J Huijbregts,et al.  How Many Environmental Impact Indicators Are Needed in the Evaluation of Product Life Cycles? , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  Magdalena Svanström,et al.  Climate impact assessment in life cycle assessments of forest products : implications of method choice for results and decision making , 2016 .

[44]  Thomas R. Fox,et al.  Sustained productivity in intensively managed forest plantations , 2000 .

[45]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Exergy-based accounting for land as a natural resource in life cycle assessment , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[46]  Karin Arnold,et al.  Kaskadennutzung von nachwachsenden Rohstoffen: ein Konzept zur Verbesserung der Rohstoffeffizienz und Optimierung der Landnutzung , 2009 .

[47]  Gabriele Weber-Blaschke,et al.  LCA-based optimization of wood utilization under special consideration of a cascading use of wood. , 2015, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  Frank Werner,et al.  Wooden building products in comparative LCA , 2007 .

[49]  Yi Zhang,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, Part I: a critical review. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  Bhavik R Bakshi,et al.  Accounting for ecosystem services in Life Cycle Assessment, Part II: toward an ecologically based LCA. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[51]  J. Szargut.  Exergy Method: Technical and Ecological Applications , 2005 .

[52]  Martin Junginger,et al.  The GHG contribution of the cascaded use of harvested wood products in comparison with the use of wood for energy-A case study on available forest resources in Canada , 2013 .

[53]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Applying cumulative exergy demand (CExD) indicators to the ecoinvent database , 2006 .

[54]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Annual Report 2013-2014 , 2014 .

[55]  Ted Sirkin,et al.  The cascade chain , 1994 .