Optimization of combination therapy for chronic myeloid leukemia with dosing constraints

In this work, we demonstrate a mathematical technique for optimizing combination regimens with constraints. We apply the technique to a mathematical model for treatment of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. The in-host model includes leukemic cell and immune system dynamics during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunomodulatory compounds. The model is minimal (semi-mechanistic) with just enough detail that all relevant therapeutic effects can be represented. The regimens are optimized to yield the highest possible reduction in disease burden, taking into account dosing constraints and side effect risks due to drug exposure. We compare the following three types of regimens: (1) regimens that are restricted to certain discrete dose levels, which can only change every three months; (2) optimal regimens determined using optimal control; and (3) regimens that are piecewise-constant like the first type of regimen, but are obtained as approximations to the optimal control regimens. All three types of regimens result in similar outcomes, but the last one is easy to compute in addition to being clinically feasible.

[1]  B. Druker,et al.  BCR-ABL mRNA levels at and after the time of a complete cytogenetic response (CCR) predict the duration of CCR in imatinib mesylate-treated patients with CML. , 2006, Blood.

[2]  Doron Levy,et al.  A Mathematical Model of the Enhancement of Tumor Vaccine Efficacy by Immunotherapy , 2012, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[3]  H. Kantarjian,et al.  Therapy of chronic myelogenous leukemia , 1987, Cancer.

[4]  C. D. de Souza,et al.  Monitoring of BCR-ABL levels in chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with imatinib in the chronic phase - the importance of a major molecular response , 2011, Revista brasileira de hematologia e hemoterapia.

[5]  M. Chyba,et al.  Singular Trajectories and Their Role in Control Theory , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  J. Radich,et al.  Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  S. Mustjoki,et al.  Dasatinib promotes Th1-type responses in granzyme B expressing T-cells , 2014, Oncoimmunology.

[8]  E. Afenya,et al.  Diverse ideas on the growth kinetics of disseminated cancer cells , 2000, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[9]  K. Sullivan,et al.  Antileukemic effect of chronic graft-versus-host disease: contribution to improved survival after allogeneic marrow transplantation. , 1981, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  Harel Dahari,et al.  Modelling Hepatitis C virus Kinetics: The Relationship between the Infected Cell Loss rate and the Final Slope of Viral Decay , 2008, Antiviral therapy.

[11]  U. Ledzewicz,et al.  Optimal control applied to a generalized Michaelis-Menten model of CML therapy , 2017 .

[12]  T. Suda,et al.  The analysis, roles and regulation of quiescence in hematopoietic stem cells , 2014, Development.

[13]  A SIMPLE MODEL OF A STEADY STATE DIFFERENTIATING CELL SYSTEM , 1969, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  J. Melo,et al.  Safety and efficacy of imatinib cessation for CML patients with stable undetectable minimal residual disease: results from the TWISTER study. , 2013, Blood.

[15]  Robert F. Stengel,et al.  Optimal control of innate immune response , 2002, Optimal Control Applications and Methods.

[16]  E. Diamandis,et al.  Cancer immunotherapy: the beginning of the end of cancer? , 2016, BMC Medicine.

[17]  N. Komarova Mathematical modeling of cyclic treatments of chronic myeloid leukemia. , 2011, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[18]  Richard Bellman,et al.  Introduction to the mathematical theory of control processes , 1967 .

[19]  D. Kirschner,et al.  Modeling immunotherapy of the tumor – immune interaction , 1998, Journal of mathematical biology.

[20]  H. Schättler,et al.  Geometric Optimal Control , 2012 .

[21]  Jonathan Zinsl,et al.  Delay equations modeling the effects of phase-specific drugs and immunotherapy on proliferating tumor cells. , 2012, Mathematical biosciences and engineering : MBE.

[22]  C. Sawyers Chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  S. I. Rubinow,et al.  A mathematical model of neutrophil production and control in normal man , 1975, Journal of mathematical biology.

[24]  Benedetto Piccoli,et al.  Optimal Control in a Model of Dendritic Cell Transfection Cancer Immunotherapy , 2006 .

[25]  L. S. Pontryagin,et al.  Mathematical Theory of Optimal Processes , 1962 .

[26]  S. Mustjoki,et al.  Mono/oligoclonal T and NK cells are common in chronic myeloid leukemia patients at diagnosis and expand during dasatinib therapy. , 2010, Blood.

[27]  J. Melo,et al.  Natural course and biology of CML , 2015, Annals of Hematology.

[28]  R. Weinberg,et al.  The Biology of Cancer , 2006 .

[29]  A. Eladdadi,et al.  Modeling cancer-immune responses to therapy , 2014, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[30]  Eduardo D Sontag,et al.  Evaluating optimal therapy robustness by virtual expansion of a sample population, with a case study in cancer immunotherapy , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[31]  Yuri Kogan,et al.  Predicting Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Immunotherapy by Personalized Mathematical Models , 2010, PloS one.

[32]  Drew M. Pardoll,et al.  The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy , 2012, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[33]  Z. Estrov,et al.  The biology of chronic myeloid leukemia. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  A. Fokas,et al.  Mathematical model of granulocytopoiesis and chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 1991, Cancer research.

[35]  A. Radunskaya,et al.  Mixed Immunotherapy and Chemotherapy of Tumors: Modeling, Applications and Biological Interpretations , 2022 .

[36]  S. Karnik,et al.  AT1 Receptor Induced Alterations in Histone H2A Reveal Novel Insights into GPCR Control of Chromatin Remodeling , 2010, PloS one.

[37]  N. Lanchier,et al.  The Role of Space in the Exploitation of Resources , 2011, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[38]  U. Ledzewicz,et al.  Dynamical Systems Properties of a Mathematical Model for the Treatment of CML , 2016 .

[39]  N. Komarova,et al.  Symmetric vs. Asymmetric Stem Cell Divisions: An Adaptation against Cancer? , 2013, PloS one.

[40]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  Optimal Control for Mathematical Models of Cancer Therapies: An Application of Geometric Methods , 2015 .

[41]  Suzanne Lenhart,et al.  Optimal control of treatment in a mathematical model of chronic myelogenous leukemia. , 2007, Mathematical biosciences.

[42]  Urszula Ledzewicz,et al.  OPTIMAL CONTROLS FOR A MATHEMATICAL MODEL OF TUMOR-IMMUNE INTERACTIONS UNDER TARGETED CHEMOTHERAPY WITH IMMUNE BOOST , 2013 .

[43]  A. d’Onofrio A general framework for modeling tumor-immune system competition and immunotherapy: Mathematical analysis and biomedical inferences , 2005, 1309.3337.

[44]  Helen Moore,et al.  A mathematical model for chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and T cell interaction. , 2004, Journal of theoretical biology.

[45]  Heino Prinz,et al.  Hill coefficients, dose–response curves and allosteric mechanisms , 2010, Journal of chemical biology.

[46]  F. Mahon,et al.  Deep molecular responses for treatment‐free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia , 2016, Cancer medicine.

[47]  Nicolas André,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Cancer Immunotherapy and Its Synergy with Radiotherapy. , 2016, Cancer research.