Psychometric properties of a Power Mobility Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure

Caregiver burnout is a serious concern among informal caregivers, especially for those who provide care to individuals with more severe limitations such as power mobility users. The Power Wheelchair Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure tool measures device specific and overall burden experienced by informal caregivers of power mobility users. A one-month, test-retest study was conducted to examine the reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity of the Power Wheelchair Caregiver Assistive Technology Outcome Measure. Two construct validity measures were administered: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Late Life Disability Index. The test-retest-reliabilities of part 1 (power wheelchair specific burden) and part 2 (general caregiving burden) were 0.769 and 0.843 respectively. Scores on part 1 were moderately and positively correlated with part 2 and with frequency of participation. Scores on part 2 were moderately and negatively correlated with anxiety, depression, and positively with perceived limitation of participation. The strength and direction of these correlations provide support for the construct validity of the measure and suggest part 1 and part 2 provide complementary information. Further testing is needed to assess the clinical utility and responsiveness of the measure.

[1]  J. Jutai,et al.  How Assistive Technology Use by Individuals with Disabilities Impacts Their Caregivers: A Systematic Review of the Research Evidence , 2012, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[2]  M. Finlayson,et al.  Responses to the acquisition and use of power mobility by individuals who have multiple sclerosis and their families. , 2006, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.

[3]  G. Huston The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. , 1987, The Journal of rheumatology.

[4]  Marcus J Fuhrer,et al.  A Conceptual Framework of Outcomes for Caregivers of Assistive Technology Users , 2009, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[5]  Paul Kennedy,et al.  A preliminary psychometric evaluation of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in 963 people livingwith a spinal cord injury , 2006, Psychology, health & medicine.

[6]  J. G. Rivas,et al.  Relationship Between Perceived Burden of Caring for a Family Member with Alzheimer's Disease and Decreased Participation in Meaningful Activities , 2009, Occupational therapy in health care.

[7]  Patricia C. Higginbottom,et al.  Americans with Disabilities , 2001 .

[8]  E. Molinari,et al.  Burden, depression, and anxiety in caregivers of people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis , 2010, Psychology, health & medicine.

[9]  Nichole Egbert,et al.  The Emotional Needs of Care Recipients and the Psychological Well‐Being of Informal Caregivers: Implications for Home Care Clinicians , 2008, Home healthcare nurse.

[10]  A. Frank,et al.  Electric-powered indoor/outdoor wheelchairs (EPIOCs): users' views of influence on family, friends and carers , 2010, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[11]  Frank DeRuyter,et al.  Development and preliminary evaluation of the caregiver assistive technology outcome measure. , 2015, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  K. Matthews,et al.  Spousal caregivers' activity restriction and depression: a model for changes over time. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[13]  R. Zorowitz,et al.  Anxiety and depression associated with caregiver burden in caregivers of stroke survivors with spasticity. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[14]  D. Altman,et al.  Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha , 1997 .

[15]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[16]  V. Freedman,et al.  Factors Influencing the Use of Mobility Technology in Community-Based Long-Term Care , 2004, Journal of aging and health.

[17]  A. Frank,et al.  Introduction of a new NHS electric-powered indoor/outdoor chair (EPIOC) service: benefits, risks and implications for prescribers , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[18]  E. Andresen,et al.  Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[20]  R. Hébert,et al.  The Functional Autonomy Measurement System (SMAF): description and validation of an instrument for the measurement of handicaps. , 1988, Age and ageing.

[21]  N. Cuellar,et al.  Caregiver distress: what nurses in rural settings can do to help. , 1999, Nursing forum.