Overview on the Rule of Five

In the mid‐ to late 1990s, because of the drug discovery paradigm shift from phenotypic screens to combinatorial chemistry and high‐throughput screening, the physicochemical properties of exploratory drug molecules displayed a dramatic shift toward higher molecular weight and lipophilicity. In response, Lipinski and coworkers reported an analysis of compounds that successfully navigated Phase I and entered into Phase II clinical studies, and correlated the computed physicochemical properties of these molecules to their aqueous solubility, permeability, and oral bioavailability. In doing so, the authors created the “Rule of Five,” a mnemonic tool for medicinal chemists to use to quickly assess compounds during the drug discovery and optimization process with respect to the compounds' likelihood to display good solubility and permeability profiles. This overview outlines the basis for the Rule of Five, the ways in which it has been applied, and its impact on drug discovery and development. Curr. Protoc. Pharmacol. 49:9.12.1‐9.12.8. © 2010 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  P. Leeson,et al.  The influence of drug-like concepts on decision-making in medicinal chemistry , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[2]  A. Ghose,et al.  Atomic Physicochemical Parameters for Three‐Dimensional Structure‐Directed Quantitative Structure‐Activity Relationships I. Partition Coefficients as a Measure of Hydrophobicity , 1986 .

[3]  Pravin Chaturvedi,et al.  Design principles for orally bioavailable drugs , 1996 .

[4]  Stephen R. Johnson,et al.  Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. , 2002, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[5]  Michael H. Abraham,et al.  Hydrogen bonding. 31. Construction of a scale of solute effective or summation hydrogen‐bond basicity , 1993 .

[6]  Bernard Testa,et al.  Lipophilicity in Molecular Modeling , 1996, Pharmaceutical Research.

[7]  I. Kola,et al.  Can the pharmaceutical industry reduce attrition rates? , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[8]  Thomas J. Vidmar,et al.  A non-aqueous partitioning system for predicting the oral absorption potential of peptides , 1994 .

[9]  Peter C. Jurs,et al.  Computer-Assisted Computation of Partition Coefficients from Molecular Structures Using Fragment Constants , 1979, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[10]  A. Bangham,et al.  Diffusion of Small Non-Electrolytes across Liposome Membranes , 1972, Nature.

[11]  M. Congreve,et al.  A 'rule of three' for fragment-based lead discovery? , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[12]  J. Broach,et al.  High-throughput screening for drug discovery. , 1996, Nature.

[13]  Michal Vieth,et al.  Dependence of molecular properties on proteomic family for marketed oral drugs. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  C. Lipinski Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[15]  K. Hillgren,et al.  In vitro systems for studying intestinal drug absorption , 1995, Medicinal research reviews.

[16]  Christopher,et al.  ORALLY ACTIVE DRUGS: TECHNICAL AND PEOPLE ISSUES , 2003 .

[17]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings. , 2001, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[18]  J. Proudfoot Drugs, leads, and drug-likeness: an analysis of some recently launched drugs. , 2002, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[19]  S. Hirono,et al.  Comparison of Reliability of log P Values for Drugs Calculated by Several Methods , 1994 .

[20]  W. Pardridge Transport of small molecules through the blood-brain barrier: biology and methodology. , 1995, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[21]  Oleg A. Raevsky,et al.  H-BOND CONTRIBUTION TO OCTANOL-WATER PARTITION COEFFICIENTS OF POLAR COMPOUNDS , 1995 .

[22]  D. T. Friesen,et al.  Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose acetate succinate-based spray-dried dispersions: an overview. , 2008, Molecular pharmaceutics.

[23]  M. Másson,et al.  Cyclodextrins in drug delivery , 2005, Expert opinion on drug delivery.

[24]  Alan Baillie,et al.  Pre-formulation : The key to successful transition into pre-clinical development , 2007 .

[25]  Innovation OR Stagnation Challenge and Opportunity on the Critical Path to New Medical Products , 2004 .

[26]  Barrie Wilkinson,et al.  Drug discovery beyond the 'rule-of-five'. , 2007, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[27]  Ajay,et al.  Designing libraries with CNS activity. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[28]  John P. Overington,et al.  How many drug targets are there? , 2006, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  J. Blake Examination of the computed molecular properties of compounds selected for clinical development. , 2003, BioTechniques.

[30]  György M. Keserü,et al.  The influence of lead discovery strategies on the properties of drug candidates , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[31]  Oleg A. Raevsky,et al.  Complete Thermodynamic Description of H‐Bonding in the Framework of Multiplicative Approach , 1992 .