The gateway belief model: A large-scale replication

[1]  Adam J. L. Harris,et al.  The potential power of experience in communications of expert consensus levels , 2019 .

[2]  Ethan Porter,et al.  The Elusive Backfire Effect: Mass Attitudes’ Steadfast Factual Adherence , 2019 .

[3]  Matthew H. Goldberg,et al.  The role of anchoring in judgments about expert consensus , 2019, Journal of Applied Social Psychology.

[4]  Perceptions of scientific consensus predict later beliefs about the reality of climate change using cross-lagged panel analysis: A response to Kerr and Wilson (2018) , 2018, Journal of Environmental Psychology.

[5]  A. Coppock,et al.  Does Counter-Attitudinal Information Cause Backlash? Results from Three Large Survey Experiments , 2018, British Journal of Political Science.

[6]  Costas Panagopoulos,et al.  Ideological asymmetries in conformity, desire for shared reality, and the spread of misinformation. , 2018, Current opinion in psychology.

[7]  Washington Dc,et al.  Communicating Science Effectively: A Research Agenda , 2018 .

[8]  P. S. Hart,et al.  In consensus we trust? Persuasive effects of scientific consensus communication , 2018, Public understanding of science.

[9]  Marc S. Wilson,et al.  Changes in perceived scientific consensus shift beliefs about climate change and GM food safety , 2018, PloS one.

[10]  D. Sherman,et al.  Psychological Barriers to Bipartisan Public Support for Climate Policy , 2018, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[11]  B. Johnson.  “Counting votes” in public responses to scientific disputes , 2018, Public understanding of science.

[12]  Joshua C. Tom.  Social Origins of Scientific Deviance: Examining Creationism and Global Warming Skepticism , 2018 .

[13]  P. Howe,et al.  Experimental effects of climate messages vary geographically , 2018, Nature Climate Change.

[14]  L. Scruggs,et al.  Correcting misinformation about climate change: the impact of partisanship in an experimental setting , 2018, Climatic Change.

[15]  Keiichi Kobayashi.  Effects of conflicting scientific arguments on belief change: Argument evaluation and expert consensus perception as mediators , 2018 .

[16]  Adam R. Pearson,et al.  Climate change and intergroup relations: Psychological insights, synergies, and future prospects , 2018 .

[17]  J. Swim,et al.  The intergroup foundations of climate change justice , 2018 .

[18]  James N. Druckman,et al.  Do partisanship and politicization undermine the impact of a scientific consensus message about climate change? , 2018 .

[19]  Keiichi Kobayashi.  The Impact of Perceived Scientific and Social Consensus on Scientific Beliefs , 2018 .

[20]  Torrin M. Liddell,et al.  The Bayesian New Statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective , 2016, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[21]  D. Tingley,et al.  Beliefs about Climate Beliefs: The Importance of Second-Order Opinions for Climate Politics , 2017 .

[22]  Jay D. Hmielowski,et al.  Improving Climate Change Acceptance Among U.S. Conservatives Through Value-Based Message Targeting , 2017 .

[23]  P. Brewer,et al.  “A Statistically Representative Climate Change Debate”: Satirical Television News, Scientific Consensus, and Public Perceptions of Global Warming , 2017 .

[24]  S. Dunwoody,et al.  Using Weight-of-Experts Messaging to Communicate Accurately About Contested Science , 2017 .

[25]  Ullrich K. H. Ecker,et al.  Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  J. Druckman,et al.  The Nature and Origins of Misperceptions: Understanding False and Unsupported Beliefs About Politics , 2017 .

[27]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  Inoculating the Public against Misinformation about Climate Change , 2017, Global challenges.

[28]  Scientific agreement can neutralize politicization of facts , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[29]  Graham N. Dixon.  Applying the Gateway Belief Model to Genetically Modified Food Perceptions: New Insights and Additional Questions , 2016 .

[30]  L. Hamilton.  Public Awareness of the Scientific Consensus on Climate , 2016 .

[31]  Jonathon P. Schuldt.  “Global Warming” versus “Climate Change” and the Influence of Labeling on Public Perceptions , 2016 .

[32]  Aaron M. McCright,et al.  The Political Divide on Climate Change: Partisan Polarization Widens in the U.S. , 2016 .

[33]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Motivated Rejection of Science , 2016 .

[34]  Consensus Cues, Issue Salience and Policy Preferences: An Experimental Investigation , 2016 .

[35]  N. Oreskes,et al.  Consensus on consensus: a synthesis of consensus estimates on human-caused global warming , 2016 .

[36]  T. Deryugina,et al.  The Effect of Information Provision on Public Consensus about Climate Change , 2016, PloS one.

[37]  Kelly S. Fielding,et al.  Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change , 2016 .

[38]  Derek J. Koehler,et al.  Can journalistic "false balance" distort public perception of consensus in expert opinion? , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[39]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Rational Irrationality: Modeling Climate Change Belief Polarization Using Bayesian Networks , 2016, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[40]  Elizabeth Levy Paluck,et al.  Norm Perception as a Vehicle for Social Change , 2016 .

[41]  Leona Yi-Fan Su,et al.  YouTube, Social Norms and Perceived Salience of Climate Change in the American Mind , 2017 .

[42]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Small behavioral science–informed changes can produce large policy-relevant effects , 2015, Behavioral Science & Policy.

[43]  E. Maibach,et al.  Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: evidence from a randomized experiment , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[44]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  Improving Public Engagement With Climate Change , 2015, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[45]  Toby Bolsen,et al.  Counteracting the Politicization of Science , 2015 .

[46]  W. Crano.  Fox and Not-Fox Television News Impact on Opinions on Global Warming: Selective Exposure, Not Motivated Reasoning , 2015 .

[47]  Teresa A. Myers,et al.  Simple Messages Help Set the Record Straight about Scientific Agreement on Human-Caused Climate Change: The Results of Two Experiments , 2015, PloS one.

[48]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change as a Gateway Belief: Experimental Evidence , 2015, PloS one.

[49]  D. Kahan.  Climate-Science Communication and the Measurement Problem , 2015 .

[50]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Questionnaire Design Effects in Climate Change Surveys , 2015 .

[51]  Eva Chen,et al.  Identifying Expertise to Extract the Wisdom of Crowds , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[52]  S. O'Neill,et al.  Investigating the effects of knowledge and ideology on climate change beliefs , 2014 .

[53]  Richard P. Larrick,et al.  The wisdom of select crowds. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[54]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? , 2014, Climatic Change.

[55]  Danielle Gaucher,et al.  Political Conservatives’ Affinity for Obedience to Authority Is Loyal, Not Blind , 2014, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  James N. Druckman,et al.  The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion , 2014 .

[57]  Michaël Aklin,et al.  Perceptions of scientific dissent undermine public support for environmental policy , 2014 .

[58]  Anthony Leiserowitz,et al.  The Role of Emotion in Global Warming Policy Support and Opposition , 2013, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[59]  R. Dunlap,et al.  Leading Voices in the Denier Choir , 2013 .

[60]  Gilles E. Gignac,et al.  The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science , 2013 .

[61]  A. McCright,et al.  Perceived scientific agreement and support for government action on climate change in the USA , 2013, Climatic Change.

[62]  P. Sol Hart,et al.  Boomerang Effects in Science Communication , 2012, Commun. Res..

[63]  R. Weber,et al.  Testing Equivalence in Communication Research: Theory and Application , 2012 .

[64]  L. Ross.  REFLECTIONS ON BIASED ASSIMILATION AND BELIEF POLARIZATION , 2012 .

[65]  Gary Charness,et al.  Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization , 2022 .

[66]  A. Leiserowitz,et al.  Support for climate policy and societal action are linked to perceptions about scientific agreement , 2011 .

[67]  Kristopher J Preacher,et al.  Mediation Analysis in Social Psychology: Current Practices and New Recommendations , 2011 .

[68]  R. Gifford.  The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[69]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Heuristic decision making. , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[70]  D. Kahan,et al.  Cultural cognition of scientific consensus , 2011 .

[71]  David P. Redlawsk,et al.  The Affective Tipping Point: Do Motivated Reasoners Ever “Get It”? , 2010 .

[72]  R. Dolan,et al.  How the Opinion of Others Affects Our Valuation of Objects , 2010, Current Biology.

[73]  Nicholas Smith,et al.  Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of Trust , 2010, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[74]  John G Bullock,et al.  Yes, But What's the Mechanism? (Don't Expect an Easy Answer) , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[75]  A. Hayes.  Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical Mediation Analysis in the New Millennium , 2009 .

[76]  Patrick J. Rosopa,et al.  The Relative Validity of Inferences About Mediation as a Function of Research Design Characteristics , 2008 .

[77]  Jonathan Evans.  Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[78]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[79]  Jennifer Phillips,et al.  Communication and Mental Processes: Experimental and Analytic Processing of Uncertain Climate Information , 2007 .

[80]  Charles S. Taber,et al.  Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs , 2006 .

[81]  L. Conradt,et al.  Consensus decision making in animals. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[82]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[83]  D. Kahan,et al.  Caught in the Crossfire: A Defense of the Cultural Theory of Gun-Risk Perceptions , 2003 .

[84]  P. Shrout,et al.  Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[85]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  The Heuristic-Systematic Model of Social Information Processing , 2002 .

[86]  D. O. Sears,et al.  Evidence of the Long-Term Persistence of Adults' Political Predispositions , 1999, The Journal of Politics.

[87]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Dual-process theories in social psychology , 1999 .

[88]  Sabine A. Einwiller,et al.  Accuracy Motivation, Consensus Information, and the Law of Large Numbers: Effects on Attitude Judgment in the Absence of Argumentation , 1998 .

[89]  R. Nickerson.  Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises , 1998 .

[90]  Diana C. Mutz.  Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes , 1998 .

[91]  M Haines,et al.  Changing the perception of the norm: a strategy to decrease binge drinking among college students. , 1996, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[92]  Shelly Chaiken,et al.  Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy- versus impression-motivated heuristic and systematic processing. , 1996 .

[93]  Deanna Kuhn,et al.  Effects of Evidence on Attitudes: Is Polarization the Norm? , 1996 .

[94]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[95]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  When small effects are impressive , 1992 .

[96]  Carl A. Kallgren,et al.  A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior , 1991 .

[97]  Z. Kunda,et al.  The case for motivated reasoning. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[98]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. , 1989 .

[99]  S. Chaiken.  Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[100]  L. Ross,et al.  Biased Assimilation and Attitude Polarization: The Effects of Prior Theories on Subsequently Considered Evidence , 1979 .

[101]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.