Workplace and organizational accident causation factors in the manufacturing industry

Labor inspectors investigate accidents to identify possible accident causes, initiate prosecution, and plan future accident prevention. The Method of Investigation for Labor Inspectors (MILI) was designed to help them to identify workplace and organizational factors in addition to immediate factors and legal breaches. The present study analyzes the impact of workplace (work design and provision of unsafe equipment) and organizational factors (training and employee involvement) on accident causation and validates MILI on real accident cases. Accident data from the manufacturing sector are analyzed with LISREL structural equation modeling. Results confirm the relationship between work design and training as well as between provision of unsafe equipment and employee involvement. The present study provides evidence that MILI is a structured accident investigation method allowing multiple accident causation factors to be revealed and that it could help all interested parts (not only labor inspectors, but companies as well) to thoroughly investigate occupational accidents. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  M. Burns,et al.  Case-Control Study , 2020, Definitions.

[2]  Emmanuel Manatakis,et al.  Towards an evaluation of accident investigation methods in terms of their alignment with accident causation models , 2009 .

[3]  Celeste Jacinto,et al.  Workplace and organisational factors in accident analysis within the food industry , 2009 .

[4]  Emmanuel Manatakis,et al.  Factors Attributed to Fatal Occupational Accidents in a Period of 5 Years Preceding the Athens 2004 Olympic Games , 2008, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[5]  H. Shannon,et al.  Have companies improved their health and safety approaches over the last decade? A longitudinal study. , 2005, American journal of industrial medicine.

[6]  C Kirchsteiger,et al.  Accident investigation practices in Europe--main responses from a recent study of accidents in industry and transport. , 2004, Journal of hazardous materials.

[7]  Jean Cross,et al.  Mechanical equipment injuries in small manufacturing businesses , 1999 .

[8]  James T. Reason,et al.  Managing the risks of organizational accidents , 1997 .

[9]  Harry S. Shannon,et al.  Overview of the relationship between organizational and workplace factors and injury rates , 1997 .

[10]  Thomas A. Kochan,et al.  What works at work : overview and assessment , 1996 .

[11]  Unto Varonen.  Safeguarding of lathes and occupational accidents , 1995 .

[12]  Richard Townsend Gun,et al.  A case-control study of possible risk factors in the causation of occupational injury , 1994 .

[13]  Rod J. Graves,et al.  Using ergonomics in engineering design to improve health and safety , 1992 .

[14]  Trevor Kletz,et al.  The need for friendly plants , 1990 .

[15]  W. T. Singleton,et al.  Accidents and the progress of technology , 1982 .

[16]  C. Demunter.  Statistics in focus. Industry, trade and services. Population and social conditions. A look at the seasonal bias in the tourism accommodation sector in 2009. 2010.53 , 2010 .

[17]  P. Swuste.  “You will only see it, if you understand it” or occupational risk prevention from a management perspective , 2008 .

[18]  Seth Ayim Gyekye,et al.  Causal attributions of Ghanaian industrial workers for accident occurrence: miners and non-miners perspective. , 2003, Journal of safety research.

[19]  Elaine Aspinwall,et al.  WORK ACCIDENTS INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUE (WAIT) - PART I , 2003 .

[20]  Brian E. Becker,et al.  HIGH PERFORMANCE WORK SYSTEMS AND FIRM PERFORMANCE : A SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND MANAGERIAL IMPLICATIONS , 1998 .

[21]  Jouko Suokas,et al.  The effect of power-press regulations in Finland , 1983 .