Biomarkers of Stroke Recovery: Consensus-Based Core Recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable*

The most difficult clinical questions in stroke rehabilitation are “What is this patient’s potential for recovery?” and “What is the best rehabilitation strategy for this person, given her/his clinical profile?” Without answers to these questions, clinicians struggle to make decisions regarding the content and focus of therapy, and researchers design studies that inadvertently mix participants who have a high likelihood of responding with those who do not. Developing and implementing biomarkers that distinguish patient subgroups will help address these issues and unravel the factors important to the recovery process. The goal of the present paper is to provide a consensus statement regarding the current state of the evidence for stroke recovery biomarkers. Biomarkers of motor, somatosensory, cognitive and language domains across the recovery timeline post-stroke are considered; with focus on brain structure and function, and exclusion of blood markers and genetics. We provide evidence for biomarkers that are considered ready to be included in clinical trials, as well as others that are promising but not ready and so represent a developmental priority. We conclude with an example that illustrates the utility of biomarkers in recovery and rehabilitation research, demonstrating how the inclusion of a biomarker may enhance future clinical trials. In this way, we propose a way forward for when and where we can include biomarkers to advance the efficacy of the practice of, and research into, rehabilitation and recovery after stroke.

[1]  D. Copland,et al.  A new era of systems neuroscience in aphasia? , 2018 .

[2]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Real-Time Strategy Game Training: Emergence of a Cognitive Flexibility Trait , 2013, PloS one.

[3]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Motor Learning in Stroke , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  Scott E Kasner,et al.  Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales , 2006, The Lancet Neurology.

[5]  Correlation of Fractional Anisotropy With Motor Recovery in Patients With Stroke After Postacute Rehabilitation. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  L. Boyd,et al.  Evaluation of differences in brain neurophysiology and morphometry associated with hand function in individuals with chronic stroke. , 2015, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[7]  Mark Rijpkema,et al.  Default Mode Network Connectivity in Stroke Patients , 2013, PloS one.

[8]  Vicky Chan,et al.  Corticospinal Excitability as a Predictor of Functional Gains at the Affected Upper Limb Following Robotic Training in Chronic Stroke Survivors , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  C. Romanowski,et al.  MR Perfusion , 2008 .

[10]  Matthew Petoe,et al.  The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Disruptions of network connectivity predict impairment in multiple behavioral domains after stroke , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Steven A Kautz,et al.  Corticospinal tract lesion load: An imaging biomarker for stroke motor outcomes , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[13]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  Differential white matter involvement associated with distinct visuospatial deficits after right hemisphere stroke , 2017, Cortex.

[14]  Rick M Dijkhuizen,et al.  Structural and functional plasticity in the somatosensory cortex of chronic stroke patients. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[15]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Arm function after stroke: Neurophysiological correlates and recovery mechanisms assessed by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  Bokkyu Kim,et al.  Can Neurological Biomarkers of Brain Impairment Be Used to Predict Poststroke Motor Recovery? A Systematic Review , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  Charles Ellis,et al.  Post-stroke aphasia prognosis: a review of patient-related and stroke-related factors. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[18]  G. Rees,et al.  Human brain lesion-deficit inference remapped , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  C. Rorden,et al.  Success of Anomia Treatment in Aphasia Is Associated With Preserved Architecture of Global and Left Temporal Lobe Structural Networks , 2016, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  M Leclercq,et al.  The anatomy of aphasia revisited , 2000, Neurology.

[21]  Sung Tae Kim,et al.  Significance of longitudinal changes in the default‐mode network for cognitive recovery after stroke , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[22]  P. Delwaide,et al.  Can motor recovery in stroke patients be predicted by early transcranial magnetic stimulation? , 1996, Stroke.

[23]  S. Cramer,et al.  The case for modality-specific outcome measures in clinical trials of stroke recovery-promoting agents. , 2007, Stroke.

[24]  Lara Allet,et al.  EEG Alpha Band Synchrony Predicts Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients with Ischemic Stroke , 2013, Behavioural neurology.

[25]  A. Puce,et al.  Same Intervention–Different Reorganization , 2016, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[26]  D. Werring,et al.  Cognitive dysfunction in patients with cerebral microbleeds on T2*-weighted gradient-echo MRI. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[27]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  L. Boyd,et al.  Diffusion imaging and transcranial magnetic stimulation assessment of transcallosal pathways in chronic stroke , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[29]  F. Piccione,et al.  Clinical correlation between motor evoked potentials and gait recovery in poststroke patients. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  S. Miller,et al.  Longitudinal study of central motor conduction time following stroke. 2. Central motor conduction measured within 72 h after stroke as a predictor of functional outcome at 12 months. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Normalization of network connectivity in hemispatial neglect recovery , 2016, Annals of neurology.

[32]  ChristopherDoughty,et al.  Detection and Predictive Value of Fractional Anisotropy Changes of the Corticospinal Tract in the Acute Phase of a Stroke , 2016 .

[33]  Camarin E. Rolle,et al.  Video game training enhances cognitive control in older adults , 2013, Nature.

[34]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Predicting language outcome and recovery after stroke: the PLORAS system , 2010, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[35]  X. Ding,et al.  Patterns in default-mode network connectivity for determining outcomes in cognitive function in acute stroke patients , 2014, Neuroscience.

[36]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  How to design clinical rehabilitation trials for the upper paretic limb early post stroke? , 2016, Trials.

[37]  C. Calautti,et al.  Functional Neuroimaging Studies of Motor Recovery After Stroke in Adults: A Review , 2003, Stroke.

[38]  G. D. de Zubicaray,et al.  A functional MRI study of the relationship between naming treatment outcomes and resting state functional connectivity in post‐stroke aphasia , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[39]  D. Harrington,et al.  MEG response to median nerve stimulation correlates with recovery of sensory and motor function after stroke , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[40]  T. Kotake,et al.  Association of Leukoaraiosis With Convalescent Rehabilitation Outcome in Patients With Ischemic Stroke , 2016, Stroke.

[41]  Y. Samson,et al.  The ischemic penumbra: the location rather than the volume of recovery determines outcome. , 2014, Current opinion in neurology.

[42]  Leeanne M. Carey,et al.  Improvement in Touch Sensation after Stroke is Associated with Resting Functional Connectivity Changes , 2015, Front. Neurol..

[43]  R. Meuli,et al.  Aphasia in hyperacute stroke: Language follows brain penumbra dynamics , 2003, Annals of neurology.

[44]  A. Geurts,et al.  Predicting Hand Motor Recovery in Severe Stroke: The Role of Motor Evoked Potentials in Relation to Early Clinical Assessment , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[45]  M. Chun,et al.  Prediction of lower limb motor outcomes based on transcranial magnetic stimulation findings in patients with an infarct of the anterior cerebral artery , 2015, Somatosensory & motor research.

[46]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Impairment of Speech Production Predicted by Lesion Load of the Left Arcuate Fasciculus , 2011, Stroke.

[47]  M. Stoykov,et al.  Active-Passive Bilateral Therapy as a Priming Mechanism for Individuals in the Subacute Phase of Post-Stroke Recovery: A Feasibility Study , 2010, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[48]  Matthew A Petoe,et al.  Proportional recovery after stroke depends on corticomotor integrity , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[49]  Jaume Marrugat,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a prognostic tool in stroke , 1997, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[50]  Agnes Flöel,et al.  Integrity of the hippocampus and surrounding white matter is correlated with language training success in aphasia , 2010, NeuroImage.

[51]  D. Nichols-Larsen,et al.  Assessing and Treating Higher Level Somatosensory Impairments Post Stroke , 2014, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[52]  A. Turken,et al.  The Neural Architecture of the Language Comprehension Network: Converging Evidence from Lesion and Connectivity Analyses , 2011, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[53]  S. Cramer,et al.  Moving Rehabilitation Research Forward: Developing Consensus Statements for Rehabilitation and Recovery Research* , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[54]  Cathy J. Price,et al.  Predicting outcome and recovery after stroke with lesions extracted from MRI images , 2013, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[55]  Yifei Zhu,et al.  Increased inter-hemispheric resting-state functional connectivity in acute lacunar stroke patients with aphasia , 2017, Experimental Brain Research.

[56]  Peter B Barker,et al.  Restoring Cerebral Blood Flow Reveals Neural Regions Critical for Naming , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[57]  Argye E. Hillis,et al.  Mechanisms of early aphasia recovery , 2002 .

[58]  Hsiu-Fen Lin,et al.  Cerebral White Matter Hyperintensities Predict Functional Stroke Outcome , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[59]  L. Boyd,et al.  Impact of 5‐Hz rTMS over the primary sensory cortex is related to white matter volume in individuals with chronic stroke , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[60]  T. Farr,et al.  Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Predict Outcome after Stroke: A Review of Experimental and Clinical Evidence , 2010, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[61]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Brain plasticity in recovery from stroke: An MEG assessment , 2006, NeuroImage.

[62]  L. Boyd,et al.  Both projection and commissural pathways are disrupted in individuals with chronic stroke: investigating microstructural white matter correlates of motor recovery , 2012, BMC Neuroscience.

[63]  Steven C. Cramer,et al.  Epidural Electrical Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation: Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blinded , 2015 .

[64]  Aina Puce,et al.  Relationship Between Touch Impairment and Brain Activation After Lesions of Subcortical and Cortical Somatosensory Regions , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[65]  W. Byblow,et al.  Predicting Recovery Potential for Individual Stroke Patients Increases Rehabilitation Efficiency , 2017, Stroke.

[66]  Stephen D. Hall,et al.  GABA(A) alpha-1 subunit mediated desynchronization of elevated low frequency oscillations alleviates specific dysfunction in stroke – A case report , 2010, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[67]  K. Chua,et al.  Recovery of upper limb dexterity in patients more than 1 year after stroke: Frequency, clinical correlates and predictors. , 2011, NeuroRehabilitation.

[68]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[69]  Massimo Silvetti,et al.  Damage to white matter pathways in subacute and chronic spatial neglect: a group study and 2 single-case studies with complete virtual "in vivo" tractography dissection. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[70]  Nitzan Censor,et al.  Altered Human Memory Modification in the Presence of Normal Consolidation. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[71]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  Upstream Dysfunction of Somatomotor Functional Connectivity After Corticospinal Damage in Stroke , 2012, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[72]  Bruce C V Campbell,et al.  Role of imaging in current acute ischemic stroke workflow for endovascular therapy. , 2015, Stroke.

[73]  David M. Himes,et al.  Predicting Functional Gains in a Stroke Trial , 2007, Stroke.

[74]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Improvement in Aphasia Scores After Stroke Is Well Predicted by Initial Severity , 2010, Stroke.

[75]  Manuel Graña,et al.  Impairment of functional integration of the default mode network correlates with cognitive outcome at three months after stroke , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[76]  N. Ward,et al.  Using oscillations to understand recovery after stroke. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[77]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Parietofrontal integrity determines neural modulation associated with grasping imagery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[78]  S. Cramer Stratifying patients with stroke in trials that target brain repair. , 2010, Stroke.

[79]  A. Hillis,et al.  Hypoperfusion of Wernicke's area predicts severity of semantic deficit in acute stroke , 2001, Annals of neurology.

[80]  Nick S. Ward,et al.  Restoring brain function after stroke — bridging the gap between animals and humans , 2017, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[81]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Predicting speech fluency and naming abilities in aphasic patients , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[82]  Petra Schmalbrock,et al.  Frontoparietal white matter integrity predicts haptic performance in chronic stroke , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[83]  Flavio Dell'Acqua,et al.  Anatomical predictors of aphasia recovery: a tractography study of bilateral perisylvian language networks. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[84]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Dissociated functional connectivity profiles for motor and attention deficits in acute right-hemisphere stroke. , 2016, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[85]  P. Sandercock,et al.  The Use of Blood Biomarkers to Predict Poor Outcome After Acute Transient Ischemic Attack or Ischemic Stroke , 2012, Stroke.

[86]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Interhemispheric asymmetry of primary hand representation and recovery after stroke: A MEG study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[87]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke , 2009, Annals of neurology.

[88]  N. Ward,et al.  The contribution of lesion location to upper limb deficit after stroke , 2016, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[89]  Julius Fridriksson,et al.  Left hemisphere plasticity and aphasia recovery , 2012, NeuroImage.

[90]  Maurizio Filippone,et al.  Decoding post-stroke motor function from structural brain imaging , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[91]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Evidence for Plasticity in White‐Matter Tracts of Patients with Chronic Broca's Aphasia Undergoing Intense Intonation‐based Speech Therapy , 2009, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[92]  Babak Shahbaba,et al.  Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[93]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[94]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Damage to ventral and dorsal language pathways in acute aphasia. , 2013 .

[95]  M. Hudson Human , 2018, Critical Theory and the Classical World.

[96]  P. Schmalbrock,et al.  Neural correlates supporting sensory discrimination after left hemisphere stroke , 2012, Brain Research.

[97]  J. Bussmann,et al.  Motor Recovery and Cortical Reorganization After Mirror Therapy in Chronic Stroke Patients , 2011, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[98]  D. Haussen,et al.  Leukoaraiosis and Sex Predict the Hyperacute Ischemic Core Volume , 2013, Stroke.

[99]  R J Ilmoniemi,et al.  Specific changes in somatosensory evoked magnetic fields during recovery from sensorimotor stroke , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[100]  W. Chang,et al.  The brain‐derived neurotrophic factor Val66Met polymorphism and degeneration of the corticospinal tract after stroke: a diffusion tensor imaging study , 2016, European journal of neurology.

[101]  B. Rosen,et al.  Motor Recovery and Cortical Reorganization after Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy in Stroke Patients: A Preliminary Study , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[102]  Prognostic value of lower limb motor evoked potentials for motor impairment and disability after 8 weeks of stroke rehabilitation--a prospective investigation of 100 patients. , 2001, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.

[103]  A. Hillis,et al.  “Diffusion-clinical mismatch” is associated with potential for early recovery of aphasia , 2005, Neurology.

[104]  A. Algra,et al.  The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke , 2005, Neurology.

[105]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Immediate and Long-Term Changes in Corticomotor Output in Response to Rehabilitation: Correlation with Functional Improvements in Chronic Stroke , 2004, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[106]  W. Byblow,et al.  Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[107]  W. Byblow,et al.  Proportional Recovery From Lower Limb Motor Impairment After Stroke , 2017, Stroke.

[108]  Antonello Baldassarre,et al.  Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect. , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[109]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Longitudinal Changes of Resting-State Functional Connectivity During Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2011, Stroke.

[110]  Anna M. Woollams,et al.  Capturing multidimensionality in stroke aphasia: mapping principal behavioural components to neural structures , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[111]  Bastian Cheng,et al.  Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping of stroke lesions underlying somatosensory deficits , 2015, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[112]  A. Daffertshofer,et al.  Generalizability of the Maximum Proportional Recovery Rule to Visuospatial Neglect Early Poststroke , 2017, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[113]  R. Chan,et al.  Corticospinal integrity and motor impairment predict outcomes after excitatory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a preliminary study. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[114]  Julius Fridriksson,et al.  Preservation and Modulation of Specific Left Hemisphere Regions is Vital for Treated Recovery from Anomia in Stroke , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[115]  Alan Connelly,et al.  Beyond the lesion: neuroimaging foundations for post-stroke recovery , 2013 .

[116]  M. Reding,et al.  Effect of Lesion Location on Upper Limb Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[117]  Robert Leech,et al.  Network dysfunction predicts speech production after left hemisphere stroke , 2016, Neurology.

[118]  P J Delwaide,et al.  Absence of response to early transcranial magnetic stimulation in ischemic stroke patients: prognostic value for hand motor recovery. , 1999, Stroke.

[119]  Thomas A Matyas,et al.  Impaired Discrimination of Surface Friction Contributes to Pinch Grip Deficit After Stroke , 2007, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[120]  P. Schmalbrock,et al.  Sensorimotor training and neural reorganization after stroke: a case series. , 2013, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[121]  Correlation between somatosensory function and cortical activation induced by touch stimulation in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage , 2013, The International journal of neuroscience.

[122]  Oili Salonen,et al.  Reorganization of the primary somatosensory cortex during stroke recovery , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[123]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[124]  Lauri Parkkonen,et al.  Alterations in Spontaneous Brain Oscillations during Stroke Recovery , 2013, PloS one.

[125]  H S Markus,et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI correlates with executive dysfunction in patients with ischaemic leukoaraiosis , 2004, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[126]  Lucy Dodakian,et al.  Connectivity measures are robust biomarkers of cortical function and plasticity after stroke. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[127]  Richard J. S. Wise,et al.  Task-induced brain activity in aphasic stroke patients: what is driving recovery? , 2014, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[128]  M. Seghier,et al.  The left superior temporal gyrus is a shared substrate for auditory short-term memory and speech comprehension: evidence from 210 patients with stroke , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[129]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Anatomy and physiology predict response to motor cortex stimulation after stroke , 2011, Neurology.

[130]  N. Henninger,et al.  Leukoaraiosis Burden Significantly Modulates the Association Between Infarct Volume and National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale in Ischemic Stroke , 2015, Stroke.

[131]  Jiwei He,et al.  Perturbation of Brain Oscillations after Ischemic Stroke: A Potential Biomarker for Post-Stroke Function and Therapy , 2015, International journal of molecular sciences.

[132]  M. Raichle The brain's default mode network. , 2015, Annual review of neuroscience.

[133]  L. Der-Yeghiaian,et al.  Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. , 2007, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[134]  Stefan Klöppel,et al.  Early functional magnetic resonance imaging activations predict language outcome after stroke. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[135]  B. Bussel,et al.  Longitudinal Study of Motor Recovery After Stroke: Recruitment and Focusing of Brain Activation , 2002, Stroke.

[136]  M. Kaste,et al.  MRI correlates of executive dysfunction in patients with ischaemic stroke , 2003, European journal of neurology.

[137]  A. Hillis,et al.  MR perfusion imaging reveals regions of hypoperfusion associated with aphasia and neglect , 2000, Neurology.

[138]  F. Chollet,et al.  Neural Correlates of Proprioceptive Integration in the Contralesional Hemisphere of Very Impaired Patients Shortly After a Subcortical Stroke: An fMRI Study , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[139]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Early Fiber Number Ratio Is a Surrogate of Corticospinal Tract Integrity and Predicts Motor Recovery After Stroke , 2016, Stroke.

[140]  N. Birbaumer,et al.  Magnetoencephalography in Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation , 2016, Front. Neurol..

[141]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce , 2017, International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society.

[142]  A. Lindgren,et al.  Stroke Recovery Genetics , 2016, Stroke.

[143]  R. Rosenfeld Patients , 2012, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[144]  Victor De Pasqua,et al.  Post-stroke reorganization of hand motor area: a 1-year prospective follow-up with focal transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[145]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Biomarkers of recovery after stroke , 2008, Current opinion in neurology.

[146]  C. Weiller,et al.  Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[147]  Leif Johannsen,et al.  The anatomy underlying acute versus chronic spatial neglect: a longitudinal study. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[148]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Motor Cortex Activation During Treatment May Predict Therapeutic Gains in Paretic Hand Function After Stroke , 2006, Stroke.

[149]  Jyrki P. Mäkelä,et al.  Effect of afferent input on motor cortex excitability during stroke recovery , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[150]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Anatomy of Stroke Injury Predicts Gains From Therapy , 2011, Stroke.

[151]  J W Krakauer,et al.  The proportional recovery rule for stroke revisited , 2015, Annals of neurology.

[152]  Robert Leech,et al.  Cognitive control and its impact on recovery from aphasic stroke , 2013, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[153]  Ho-Ling Liu,et al.  Neuroplastic changes in resting-state functional connectivity after stroke rehabilitation , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[154]  P. Manganotti,et al.  Effect of median-nerve electrical stimulation on BOLD activity in acute ischemic stroke patients , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[155]  N. Lannin,et al.  Are we armed with the right data? Pooled individual data review of biomarkers in people with severe upper limb impairment after stroke , 2016, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[156]  N. Ward,et al.  Brain regions important for recovery after severe post-stroke upper limb paresis , 2017, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[157]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Fiber-tracking method reveals sensorimotor pathway involvement in stroke patients. , 2003, Stroke.

[158]  B. Dobkin,et al.  Predictors and Biomarkers of Treatment Gains in a Clinical Stroke Trial Targeting the Lower Extremity , 2014, Stroke.