The Impact of Specialty Settings on the Perceived Quality of Medical Ultrasound Video

Health care professionals are increasingly viewing medical images and videos in a variety of environments. The perception of medical visual information across all specialties, career stages, and practice settings are critical to patient care and patient safety. Visual signal distortions, such as various types of noise and artifacts arising in medical imaging, affect the perceptual quality of visual content and potentially impact diagnoses. To optimize clinical practice, it is of fundamental importance to understand the way medical experts perceive visual quality. Psychophysical studies have been undertaken to evaluate the impact of visual distortions on the perceived quality of medical images and videos. However, very little research has been conducted on how speciality settings affect the perception of visual quality. In this paper, we investigate whether and how radiologists and sonographers differently perceive the quality of compressed ultrasound videos, via a dedicated subjective experiment. The findings can be used to develop useful solutions for improved visual experience and better image-based diagnoses.

[1]  Elizabeth A Krupinski,et al.  Current perspectives in medical image perception , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Wilfried Philips,et al.  Influence of study design on digital pathology image quality evaluation: the need to define a clinical task , 2017, Journal of medical imaging.

[3]  W N Hanafee,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging artifacts: mechanism and clinical significance. , 1986, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  Gary J. Sullivan,et al.  Overview of the High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) Standard , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology.

[5]  Ilona Anna Kowalik-Urbaniak,et al.  The quest for "diagnostically lossless" medical image compression using objective image quality measures , 2015 .

[6]  J. Clark,et al.  Common artifacts encountered in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1988, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[7]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[8]  E. Krupinski,et al.  Anniversary paper: evaluation of medical imaging systems. , 2008, Medical physics.

[9]  Bradley M. Hemminger,et al.  Introduction to perceptual linearization of video display systems for medical image presentation , 1995, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[10]  Ingrid Heynderickx,et al.  The Relative Impact of Ghosting and Noise on the Perceived Quality of MR Images , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Ajay Luthra,et al.  Overview of the H.264/AVC video coding standard , 2003, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[12]  Maria G. Martini,et al.  Rate-distortion and Rate-quality Performance Analysis of HEVC Compression of Medical Ultrasound Videos , 2014, MoWNet.

[13]  P. Sunna,et al.  SAMVIQ—A New EBU Methodology for Video Quality Evaluations in Multimedia , 2005 .

[14]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Statistical Evaluation of Recent Full Reference Image Quality Assessment Algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Elizabeth A. Krupinski,et al.  Improving Patient Care Through Medical Image Perception Research , 2015 .

[16]  Herman Morchel,et al.  Evaluating the effect of bit rate on the quality of portable ultrasound video , 2015, 2015 IEEE 12th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI).

[17]  Federica Battisti,et al.  Perceptually Lossless Ultrasound Video Coding for Telemedicine Applications , 2007 .

[18]  S S Sagel,et al.  Artifacts in computed radiography. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report. , 2005, Medical physics.

[20]  James Nightingale,et al.  The impact of network impairment on quality of experience (QoE) in H.265/HEVC video streaming , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[21]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  The Handbook of Medical Image Perception and Techniques , 2009 .

[22]  Peter Schelkens,et al.  Visual quality assessment of H.264/AVC compressed laparoscopic video , 2014 .

[23]  L J Cesar,et al.  Artefacts found in computed radiography. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[24]  Christine Cavaro-Ménard,et al.  Study of Video Quality Assessment for Telesurgery , 2017, IEEE Access.