Mapping landscape connectivity for large spatial extents

Mapping landscape connectivity across large spatial extents is an important component of ecological reserve network designs and species recovery plans. It can, however, be limited by computational power. One way to overcome this problem is to split the study area into smaller tiles, map landscape connectivity within each of those tiles, and then merge tiles back together to form composite connectivity maps. We tested the effects of landscape structure on the accuracy of composite landscape connectivity maps created from tiles and tested two methods to increase this accuracy. We correlated replicate, composite current density maps with untiled maps. We tested whether our findings depended on the composition of the landscape by testing maps with corridors, barriers, different mixtures of high- and low-cost habitat, and road networks. We found that composite current density maps underestimated large-scale connectivity and overestimated the contribution of small habitat patches to overall connectivity. These biases became more pronounced as the tiles became relatively smaller. Landscapes with corridors or barriers were particularly sensitive. We increased the accuracy of tiled maps by increasing pixel size or by averaging several maps created using a “moving window” approach. There is a trade-off between tile size and pixel size when modelling connectivity across large spatial extents. We suggest using the largest tile size possible when tiling is necessary, in conjunction with increased pixel size and a moving window method to increase accuracy of the composite current density maps.

[1]  S. Cushman,et al.  Inferring landscape effects on gene flow: a new model selection framework , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[2]  Bowman Jeff,et al.  Landscape Connectivity in the Great Lakes Basin , 2015 .

[3]  D. H. Reed,et al.  Realistic levels of inbreeding depression strongly affect extinction risk in wild populations , 2006 .

[4]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[5]  Dennis L. Murray,et al.  Functional connectivity of lynx at their southern range periphery in Ontario, Canada , 2012, Landscape Ecology.

[6]  Roger Bivand,et al.  Bindings for the Geospatial Data Abstraction Library , 2015 .

[7]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Using circuit theory to model connectivity in ecology, evolution, and conservation. , 2008, Ecology.

[8]  L. Fahrig,et al.  Landscape connectivity , 2021, The Routledge Handbook of Landscape Ecology.

[9]  Alan Edelman,et al.  Circuitscape in Julia: High Performance Connectivity Modelling to Support Conservation Decisions , 2019, JuliaCon Proceedings.

[10]  C. Nielsen,et al.  Does landscape connectivity shape local and global social network structure in white-tailed deer? , 2017, PloS one.

[11]  A. Hansen,et al.  Connecting models to movements: testing connectivity model predictions against empirical migration and dispersal data , 2016, Landscape Ecology.

[12]  Edward B. Duffy,et al.  gflow: software for modelling circuit theory‐based connectivity at any scale , 2017 .

[13]  A. Olds,et al.  Habitat connectivity improves reserve performance , 2012 .

[14]  Peter G. Doyle,et al.  Random Walks and Electric Networks: REFERENCES , 1987 .

[15]  Kerry L. Griffis-Kyle,et al.  Using nested connectivity models to resolve management conflicts of isolated water networks in the Sonoran Desert , 2017 .

[16]  S. Briggs Priorities and paradigms: directions in threatened species recovery , 2009 .

[17]  Michael K. Phillips,et al.  Connectivity Conservation and Endangered Species Recovery: A Study in the Challenges of Defining Conservation‐Reliant Species , 2015 .

[18]  Paul Beier,et al.  Circuit theory predicts gene flow in plant and animal populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  J. Berger,et al.  The Last Mile: How to Sustain Long‐Distance Migration in Mammals , 2004 .

[20]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  On the limitations of graph‐theoretic connectivity in spatial ecology and conservation , 2011 .

[21]  D. Doak,et al.  The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates. , 2007, Ecology letters.

[22]  Erin L. Koen,et al.  Landscape connectivity for wildlife: development and validation of multispecies linkage maps , 2014 .

[23]  Jeff Bowman,et al.  Multi-species genetic connectivity in a terrestrial habitat network , 2017, Movement ecology.

[24]  Jeffrey A. Cardille,et al.  Applying Circuit Theory for Corridor Expansion and Management at Regional Scales: Tiling, Pinch Points, and Omnidirectional Connectivity , 2014, PloS one.

[25]  Joanne C. White,et al.  Forest Connectivity Regions of Canada Using Circuit Theory and Image Analysis , 2017, PloS one.

[26]  Viral B. Shah,et al.  Circuit‐theory applications to connectivity science and conservation , 2018, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[27]  S. Bergen,et al.  Identifying impediments to long‐distance mammal migrations , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[28]  E. Pebesma,et al.  Classes and Methods for Spatial Data , 2015 .

[29]  S. Ngene,et al.  Fencing solves human‐wildlife conflict locally but shifts problems elsewhere: A case study using functional connectivity modelling of the African elephant , 2018, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[30]  Erin L. Koen,et al.  The Effect of Map Boundary on Estimates of Landscape Resistance to Animal Movement , 2010, PloS one.