Improving access to supportive cancer care through an eHealth application: a qualitative needs assessment among cancer survivors.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To gain insight into cancer survivors' needs towards an eHealth application monitoring quality of life and targeting personalised access to supportive care. BACKGROUND Supportive care in cancer addresses survivors' concerns and needs. However, many survivors are not taking advantage of supportive care provided. To enable cancer survivors to benefit, survivors' needs must be identified timely and effectively. An eHealth application could be a solution to meet patients' individual supportive care needs. DESIGN A qualitative approach. METHODS Thirty cancer survivors (15 head and neck and 15 breast cancer survivors) participated. The majority were female (n = 20·67%). The mean age was 60 (SD 8·8) years. Mean time interval since treatment was 13·5 months (SD 10·5). All interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. During the interviews, participants were asked about their unmet needs during follow-up care and a potential eHealth application. Data were analyzed independently by two coders and coded into key issues and themes. RESULTS Cancer survivors commented that they felt unprepared for the post-treatment period and that their symptoms often remained unknown to care providers. Survivors also mentioned a suboptimal referral pattern to supportive care services. Mentioned advantages of an eHealth application were as follows: insight into the course of symptoms by monitoring, availability of information among follow-up appointments, receiving personalised advice and tailored supportive care. CONCLUSIONS Cancer survivors identified several unmet needs during follow-up care. Most survivors were positive towards the proposed eHealth application and expressed that it could be a valuable addition to follow-up cancer care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Study results provide care providers with insight into barriers that impede survivors from obtaining optimal supportive care. This study also provides insight into the characteristics needed to design, build and implement an eHealth application targeting personalised access to supportive care from the survivors' perspective. Future studies should address the viewpoints of care providers, and investigate the usability of the eHealth application prototype to facilitate implementation.

[1]  Corneel Vandelanotte,et al.  Can a Website-Delivered Computer-Tailored Physical Activity Intervention Be Acceptable, Usable, and Effective for Older People? , 2012, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[2]  P. Sainsbury,et al.  Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. , 2007, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[3]  P. Selby,et al.  The clinical value of quality of life assessment in oncology practice—a qualitative study of patient and physician views , 2008, Psycho-oncology.

[4]  Elizabeth Ercolano,et al.  Self‐management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  J. Coyne,et al.  Clinical trial did not demonstrate benefits of screening patients with cancer for distress. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  M. Fitch,et al.  Supportive care framework. , 2008, Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique.

[7]  E. Paskett,et al.  Patient navigation: An update on the state of the science , 2011, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[8]  M. Fitch,et al.  Why patients with lung cancer do not want help with some needs , 2008, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  Filipa Ventura,et al.  An integrative review of supportive e-health programs in cancer care. , 2013, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[10]  J. Coyne Benefits of screening cancer patients for distress still not demonstrated , 2013, British Journal of Cancer.

[11]  J. Snowden,et al.  Holistic needs assessment in advanced, intensively treated multiple myeloma patients , 2014, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[12]  C. Davis,et al.  Social Workers as Patient Navigators for Breast Cancer Survivors: What Do African-American Medically Underserved Women Think of This Idea? , 2009, Social work in health care.

[13]  Nicol Nijland,et al.  A Holistic Framework to Improve the Uptake and Impact of eHealth Technologies , 2011, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  M. Patton,et al.  Qualitative evaluation and research methods , 1992 .

[15]  Paul Symonds,et al.  How feasible is implementation of distress screening by cancer clinicians in routine clinical care? , 2012, Cancer.

[16]  M. Patton Qualitative evaluation and research methods, 2nd ed. , 1990 .

[17]  E. Murray,et al.  Internet Interventions for Long-Term Conditions: Patient and Caregiver Quality Criteria , 2006, Journal of medical Internet research.

[18]  L. Carlson,et al.  Online screening for distress, the 6th vital sign, in newly diagnosed oncology outpatients: randomised controlled trial of computerised vs personalised triage , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[19]  A. Molassiotis,et al.  Qualitative research into the symptom experiences of adult cancer patients after treatments: a systematic review and meta-synthesis , 2012, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[20]  Albert W Wu,et al.  Feasibility and value of PatientViewpoint: a web system for patient‐reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice , 2013, Psycho-oncology.

[21]  M. Fitch,et al.  Virtual navigation in colorectal cancer and melanoma: an exploration of patients’ views , 2013, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[22]  C. H. C. Drossaert,et al.  Experiences and Preferences of Patients with Rheumatic Diseases Regarding an Interactive Health Communication Application , 2010, 2010 Second International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine.

[23]  Victoria A. Shaffer,et al.  Why Do Patients Derogate Physicians Who Use a Computer-Based Diagnostic Support System? , 2013, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[24]  Hilde Eide,et al.  Effects of an interactive tailored patient assessment on patient–clinician communication in cancer care , 2013, Psycho-oncology.

[25]  L. Carlson,et al.  High levels of untreated distress and fatigue in cancer patients , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[26]  W. Söllner,et al.  How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling? , 2001, British Journal of Cancer.

[27]  J. Coyne,et al.  Second thoughts about implementing routine screening of cancer patients for distress , 2013 .

[28]  A. Wu,et al.  Relevant content for a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire for use in oncology clinical practice: Putting doctors and patients on the same page , 2010, Quality of Life Research.

[29]  Ilse de Bourdeaudhuij,et al.  Care needs after primary breast cancer treatment. Survivors' associated sociodemographic and medical characteristics , 2013, Psycho-oncology.

[30]  Sylvie Lambert,et al.  The unfulfilled promise: a systematic review of interventions to reduce the unmet supportive care needs of cancer patients , 2011, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[31]  P. Butow,et al.  Breast cancer survivors’ supportive care needs 2–10 years after diagnosis , 2007, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[32]  S. Brearley,et al.  The physical and practical problems experienced by cancer survivors: a rapid review and synthesis of the literature. , 2011, European journal of oncology nursing : the official journal of European Oncology Nursing Society.

[33]  Jane M. Young,et al.  What are the unmet supportive care needs of people with cancer? A systematic review , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[34]  P. Butow,et al.  What is important in cancer care coordination? A qualitative investigation. , 2011, European journal of cancer care.

[35]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Computerized prospective screening for high levels of emotional distress in head and neck cancer patients and referral rate to psychosocial care. , 2009, Oral oncology.

[36]  L. Degner,et al.  Facilitating the implementation of empirically valid interventions in psychosocial oncology and supportive care , 2011, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[37]  A. Campbell,et al.  Socio‐demographic, psychosocial and attitudinal predictors of help seeking after cancer diagnosis , 2008, Psycho-oncology.