A knowledge management application to support knowledge sharing in a design engineering community

The changing competitive landscape has brought new forces to bear on the manner in which new products are developed. These forces have put the creation and dissemination of knowledge at the centre of many firms’ new product development (NPD) strategies. Organizational models to support NPD have evolved over the years and a significant aspect of this evolution has been the emergence of organizations that are decentralized and distributed across the globe. Improvements in communication infrastructure have facilitated this trend. These new organizational forms have placed stresses and strains on firm’s ability to efficiently transfer knowledge across its organization units and it has been observed that knowledge dissemination can run aground once organization unit boundaries are encountered. A small number of empirical analyses of knowledge management systems (KMS) applications to support new product development have been done. These analyses have pointed to a dual requirement in this area – firstly, an organizational environment that promotes knowledge dissemination and secondly, an IS infrastructure to support collaboration in and across new product development teams. While some of the extant literature on KMS to support knowledge dissemination stresses the importance of “people-topeople” KMS applications and the area of knowledge discovery is starting to get attention, there appears to be a dearth of published material on the issues surrounding the actual implementation of such systems in an industrial setting. In particular, the use of such systems in the context of NPD organizations does not appear to be well understood. This research hopes to address some of these shortcomings. This paper focuses on an application that has been developed by the Technical and Marketing IS (TMIS) group in ADI’s NPD organization. The purpose of the application is to facilitate the sharing of technical knowledge in the design engineering community in ADI.

[1]  Jay Liebowitz,et al.  Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management , 2001 .

[2]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Toward A Theory of Knowledge Reuse : Types of Knowledge Reuse Situations and Factors in Reuse Success , 2022 .

[3]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Integrating knowledge on the Web , 2001, IEEE Internet Computing.

[4]  Antony Satyadas,et al.  Knowledge management tutorial: an editorial overview , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[5]  James N. Danziger,et al.  Managing Knowledge in a High Tech Company: Knowledge Sharing about Information Systems , 2000 .

[6]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  Briony J. Oates,et al.  Action Research: Putting Theory into Practice , 2001 .

[8]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[10]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[11]  Sue Newell,et al.  Intranets and knowledge management: complex processes and ironic outcomes , 1999, Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. 1999. HICSS-32. Abstracts and CD-ROM of Full Papers.

[12]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[13]  K. Hambridge.  Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[14]  K. Lewin.  Frontiers in Group Dynamics , 1947 .

[15]  Sue Newell,et al.  Knowledge management and innovation: networks and networking , 1999, J. Knowl. Manag..

[16]  Ariel J. Frank,et al.  The parallel evolution of search engines and digital libraries: their convergence to the Mega-Portal , 2000, Proceedings 2000 Kyoto International Conference on Digital Libraries: Research and Practice.

[17]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  The Knowledge Management Toolkit: Practical Techniques for Building a Knowledge Management System with Cdrom , 1999 .

[18]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[19]  Sue Newell,et al.  Limits of IT-driven knowledge management initiatives for interactive innovation processes: towards a community-based approach , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  Michael H. Zack.  An architecture for managing explicit knowledge , 1998, European Conference on Information Systems.

[21]  Robert J. McQueen,et al.  Can action research be made more rigorous in a positivist sense? The contribution of an iterative approach , 1997 .

[22]  David Vance,et al.  On the Requirements of Knowledge Transfer Using Information Systems: A Schema Whereby Such Transfer Is Enhanced , 1998 .

[23]  Susan Conway,et al.  Unlocking Knowledge Assets , 2002 .

[24]  David E. Avison,et al.  Controlling action research projects , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[25]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[26]  S. Newell,et al.  The Role of Networks In the Diffusion of Technological Innovation , 1996 .