Analysis of pedestrian stress level using GSR sensor in virtual immersive reality

Level of emotional arousal of one’s body changes in response to external stimuli in an environment. Given the risks involved while crossing streets, particularly at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks, one can expect a change in the stress level of pedestrians. In this study, we investigate the levels and changes in pedestrian stress, under different road crossing scenarios in immersive virtual reality. To measure stress level of pedestrians, we used Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) sensors. To collect the required data for the model, Virtual Immersive Reality Environment (VIRE) [1] tool is used, which enables us to measure participant’s stress levels in a controlled environment. The results suggested that the density of vehicles has a positive effect, meaning as the density of vehicles increases, so does the stress levels for pedestrians. It was noted that younger pedestrians have lower amount of stress when crossing as compared to older pedestrians which have higher amounts of stress. Geometric variables has an impact on the stress level of pedestrians. The greater the number of lanes the greater the observed stress, which is due the crossing distance increasing, while the walking speed remaining the same.

[1]  Panagiotis Mavros,et al.  Geo-EEG: Towards the Use of EEG in the Study of Urban Behaviour , 2016 .

[2]  Khaled Shaaban,et al.  Agent-based Modeling of Pedestrian Behavior at an Unmarked Midblock Crossing , 2017, ANT/SEIT.

[3]  R. Quy,et al.  A Comparison between “Aware” and “Naive” Conditions in the Suppression of GSR Activity , 1974, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  Claudio Feliciani,et al.  Efficiently informing crowds – Experiments and simulations on route choice and decision making in pedestrian crowds with wheelchair users , 2020 .

[5]  Reza N. Jazar,et al.  Artificial Intelligence and Internet of Things for Autonomous Vehicles , 2019, Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications.

[6]  Matthias Beggiato,et al.  An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles? , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  U. Lachapelle,et al.  "Outta my way!" Individual and environmental correlates of interactions between pedestrians and vehicles during street crossings. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Pengfei Li,et al.  Pedestrian Crossing Behavior at Unsignalized Mid-block Crosswalks Around the Primary School , 2013 .

[9]  Vedagiri Perumal,et al.  Pedestrians' Gap Acceptance Behavior at Mid Block Location , 2012 .

[10]  Majid Sarvi,et al.  Human exit choice in crowded built environments: Investigating underlying behavioural differences between normal egress and emergency evacuations , 2016 .

[11]  Fang Guo,et al.  Effect of psychological tension on pedestrian counter flow via an extended cost potential field cellular automaton model , 2017 .

[12]  Bilal Farooq,et al.  A context-aware pedestrian trajectory prediction framework for automated vehicles , 2022, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[13]  Ross H Day,et al.  Crossing roads safely: an experimental study of age differences in gap selection by pedestrians. , 2005, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Toshihiro Osaragi Modeling of pedestrian behavior and its applications to spatial evaluation , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[15]  Carol Holland,et al.  The effect of age, gender and driver status on pedestrians' intentions to cross the road in risky situations. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  J. Krause,et al.  Collective behavior in road crossing pedestrians: the role of social information , 2010 .

[17]  Bilal Farooq,et al.  Virtual Immersive Reality for Stated Preference Travel Behavior Experiments: A Case Study of Autonomous Vehicles on Urban Roads , 2018, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

[18]  M Suzanne Zeedyk,et al.  Behavioural observations of adult-child pairs at pedestrian crossings. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Tal Oron-Gilad,et al.  Are child-pedestrians able to identify hazardous traffic situations? Measuring their abilities in a virtual reality environment , 2015 .

[20]  Gonçalo Homem de Almeida Correia,et al.  Pedestrians’ road crossing behaviour in front of automated vehicles: Results from a pedestrian simulation experiment using agent-based modelling , 2020, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[21]  Nicolas Saunier,et al.  The impact of waiting time and other factors on dangerous pedestrian crossings and violations at signalized intersections: A case study in Montreal , 2013 .

[22]  S. Bendak,et al.  Factors affecting pedestrian behaviors at signalized crosswalks: An empirical study. , 2021, Journal of safety research.