Mechanical property characterization of prostate cancer using a minimally motorized indenter in an ex vivo indentation experiment.

[1]  D P Byar,et al.  Carcinoma of the prostate: Prognostic evaluation of certain pathologic features in 208 radical prostatectomies , 1972 .

[2]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  J. Epstein,et al.  Diagnostic criteria of limited adenocarcinoma of the prostate on needle biopsy. , 1995, Human pathology.

[4]  Zhongwei Jiang,et al.  Development of a palpation sensor for detection of prostatic cancer and hypertrophy (optimum structural design of sensor) , 1998 .

[5]  T. Krouskop,et al.  Elastic Moduli of Breast and Prostate Tissues under Compression , 1998, Ultrasonic imaging.

[6]  A J Bailey,et al.  Changes in collagen metabolism in prostate cancer: a host response that may alter progression. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[7]  G. Ayala,et al.  Reactive stroma in prostate cancer progression. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[8]  G Bartsch,et al.  Age, prostate-specific antigen, and digital rectal examination as determinants of the probability of having prostate cancer. , 2001, Urology.

[9]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Measurements and modelling of the compliance of human and porcine organs , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[10]  G. Ayala,et al.  Reactive stroma in human prostate cancer: induction of myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix remodeling. , 2002, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[11]  Gábor Székely,et al.  Inverse Finite Element Characterization of Soft Tissues , 2001, MICCAI.

[12]  Yulan Jin,et al.  Characteristics of normal stromal components and their correlation with cancer occurrence in human prostate. , 2003, Oncology reports.

[13]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  The Effects of Testing Environment on the Viscoelastic Properties of Soft Tissues , 2004, ISMS.

[14]  Edoardo Mazza,et al.  Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device , 2005, Medical Image Anal..

[15]  J. Eastham,et al.  Prostate cancer in patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination and serum prostate-specific antigen less than 4.0 ng/mL. , 2005, Urology.

[16]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2005 , 2005, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[17]  R L Reuben,et al.  Measurement of the mechanical characteristics of benign prostatic tissue: a novel method for assessing benign prostatic disease. , 2005, Urology.

[18]  R. Reuben,et al.  Measurement of tissue mechanical characteristics to distinguish between benign and malignant prostatic disease. , 2005, Urology.

[19]  Jung Kim,et al.  In Vivo Mechanical Behavior of Intra-abdominal Organs , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[20]  R L Reuben,et al.  In-vitro dynamic micro-probing and the mechanical properties of human prostate tissues. , 2006, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[21]  O. Lindahl,et al.  Resonance sensor measurements of stiffness variations in prostate tissue in vitro—a weighted tissue proportion model , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[22]  A. Gliozzi,et al.  Mechanical properties of single living cells encapsulated in polyelectrolyte matrixes. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[23]  Simon Phipps,et al.  Prostate tissue stiffness as measured with a resonance sensor system: a study on silicone and human prostate tissue in vitro , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[24]  Ziding Feng,et al.  Assessing prostate cancer risk: results from the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial. , 2006, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  Cagatay Basdogan,et al.  A robotic indenter for minimally invasive measurement and characterization of soft tissue response , 2007, Medical Image Anal..

[26]  W. Catalona,et al.  Characteristics of prostate cancer detected by digital rectal examination only. , 2006, Urology.

[27]  L. Borden,et al.  An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of Gleason ≥7 prostate cancer in men undergoing initial prostate biopsy: a prospective study of 790 men , 2007, BJU international.

[28]  Alessandro Nava,et al.  In vivo mechanical characterization of human liver , 2008, Medical Image Anal..

[29]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Biomechanical properties of abdominal organs in vivo and postmortem under compression loads. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[30]  M. Roobol,et al.  The role of the digital rectal examination in subsequent screening visits in the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer (ERSPC), Rotterdam. , 2008, European urology.